Skip to main content
Log in

Formalization and qualification of models adapted to preliminary design

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a procedure for the formalization and qualification of models adapted specifically to the requirements of preliminary design. Using this methodology the current lack of suitable decision support tools for design can be overcome. Following a needs assessment for modeling during this design phase, the approach that we develop here is based on functional decomposition to structure the system to be designed. By applying the formalization procedure defined here, the system can be analyzed using tools that are frequently used to good effect by engineers and the problem of preliminary design is structured to produce a behavior model adapted to making design choices and suitable for use with decision support tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barton R., Meckesheimer M., Booker A., Simpson T.: Computationally inexpensive metamodel assessment strategies. AIAA J. 40(10), 2053–2060 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coatanéa, E., Vareille, J., Kuuva, M.: Applying dimensionless indicators for the analysis of multiple constraints and compound objectives in conceptual design. In: Proceedings of 5th Euromech Solid Mechanics Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, August 17–22 (2003)

  3. Ordaz-Hernandez K., Fischer X., Bennis F.: Model reduction techniques for mechanical behaviour modelling: efficiciency criteria and validity domain. Proc. IMechE, Part C. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 222(C3), 493–505 (2008) ISSN:0954-4062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pailhès, J., Sallaou, M., Nadeau, J.P.: Knowledge base formulation for aided design tool. In: Trends and Recent Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, Springer, 12 p. (2006)

  5. Doré R., Pailhès J., Fischer X., Nadeau J.-P.: Identification of sensory variables towards the integration of User Requirements into preliminary design. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 37(1), 1–11 (2007) Elsevier Ed.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scaravetti, D., Nadeau, J.-P., Sébastian, P., Pailhes, J.: Analyse of an embodiment design problem for aided decision-making. In: Proceedings of IDMME 2004, 5-7/04/04, Bath, England (2004)

  7. Scaravetti, D., Sébastian, P.: Design space exploration in embodiment design: an application to the design of aircraft air conditioners. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 9(1/2/3) (2009)

  8. Sébastian P., Chenouard R., Nadeau J.-P., Fischer X.: The embodiment design constraint satisfaction problem of the BOOSTRAP facing interval analysis and genetic algorithm based decision support tools. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 1(2), 99–106. (2007) Springer, Germany

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chenouard R., Granvilliers L., Sébastian P.: Search heuristics for constraint-aided embodiment design. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 23(2), 175–195 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bouchama, A., Sébastian, P., Nadeau, J.P.: Flash evaporation: modeling and constraint formulation. Trans. IChemE 81(A) (2003)

  11. Diveux T., Sébastian P., Bernard D., Puiggali J.R., Grandidier J.Y.: Horizontal axis wind turbine systems: optimization using genetic algorithms. Wind Energ. 4, 151–171 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Battaglia J.-L., Le Lay L., Batsale J.-C., Oustaloup A., Cois O.: Heat flux estimation through inverted non-integer identification models. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 39(3), 374–389 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hugget A., Sébastian P., Nadeau J.P.: Global optimisation of a dryer by using neural networks and genetic algorithms. AIChE J. 45(6), 1227–1238 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hornik K., Stinchcombe M., White H.: Multilayer feedforward network are universal approximates. Neural Netw. 2, 359–366 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bacchus F., Chen X., Van Beek P., Walsh T.: Binary vs. non-binary constraints. Artif. Intell. 140(1-2), 1–37 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Stergiou, K.: On algorithms for decomposable constraints. In: Proceedings of the Second Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 65–71 (2002)

  17. Borrett, J.E.: Formulation selection for constraint satisfaction problems: a heuristic approach, Thèse de doctorat, University of Essex (UK) (1998)

  18. Borrett J.E., Tsang E.P.K.: A context for constraint satisfaction problem, formulation selection. Constraints 6, 299–327 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lottaz, C.: Rewriting numeric constraint satisfaction problems for consistency algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (1999)

  20. Balci O.: Verification, validation and testing. In: Banks, J. (eds) Handbook of Simulation Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice, pp. 335–393. John Wiley, (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Sébastian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vernat, Y., Nadeau, JP. & Sébastian, P. Formalization and qualification of models adapted to preliminary design. Int J Interact Des Manuf 4, 11–24 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-009-0081-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-009-0081-9

Keywords

Navigation