Introduction

Opioids often are prescribed for management of nonmalignant musculoskeletal pain [3, 12, 14, 32, 54] and orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than surgeons in any other surgical specialty and are third after primary care physicians and internists -even though these top two groups are more numerous [52]. Prescription opioids represent the fastest growing type of drug abuse, the most common cause of unintentional overdose, and lead to more deaths annually than all illicit drugs combined [23, 29].

Despite uncertainty regarding the long-term effectiveness of opioids for treating chronic musculoskeletal pain [35, 43] and emerging evidence that preoperative opioid use is associated with greater pain, disability, and dissatisfaction after orthopaedic surgery [10, 25, 31, 32, 42, 53], opioids continue to be prescribed. Although it is well established that high-risk opioid use (abuse or dependence) may result from prolonged opioid exposure during the preoperative period [57], little is known about its prevalence and effect in the perioperative orthopaedic surgery setting. A better understanding of the burden of high-risk opioid use can alert orthopaedic providers to the importance of being more cautious with opioids and perhaps delaying elective surgery until patients can safely discontinue the use of these drugs.

Using a large healthcare utilization database, we performed this study (1) to determine the prevalence of opioid abuse and dependence as a coded diagnosis in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery; and (2) to characterize the relationship of opioid abuse and dependence with inpatient mortality and adverse events, failure to rescue, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and nonroutine disposition. In addition, we wanted (3) to document which patient and hospital characteristics and which orthopaedic procedures are more likely to be associated with high-risk opioid use.

Materials and Methods

Encounter data for our retrospective cross-sectional analysis were abstracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 2002 through 2011. The NIS currently constitutes the largest all-payer inpatient care database in the United States and is operated by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [8]. Each dataset year represents a 20% stratified sample of discharges from more than 1000 short-term and non-federal hospitals. Discharges are weighted based on the sampling scheme to permit inferences for a nationally representative population [45]. In addition to patient- and provider-related data, the NIS collects up to 25 (15 before 2009) diagnoses and 15 procedures (standardized International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes), and captures selected hospitalization-related information, such as discharge destination and LOS. Our study was exempt from review by our institutional review board because the data are publicly available and deidentified.

Identification of Sample and Definitions

We considered all discharges with a primary procedure code (ICD-9-CM) for major orthopaedic surgery: primary THA (81.51), TKA (81.54), total shoulder arthroplasty (81.80, 81.88), and spinal fusion (81.00–81.08). We excluded patients whose source of admission was nonelective (eg, trauma) and patients who were transferred to another acute-care hospital [37]. To characterize the association of opioid abuse and dependence with in-hospital mortality, morbidity, and resource use after orthopaedic surgery, we identified patients with a diagnosis of opioid-type dependence (ICD-9-CM codes 304.0x, 304.7x) or nondependent opioid abuse (ICD-9-CM code 305.5x). We excluded the code for “long-term (current) use of other medications” (V58.69) used in a previous study owing to its lack of specificity for opioid abuse and dependence [45].

Demographic variables were age, sex, race/ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, other, unknown), and primary health insurance (Medicare, Medicaid, private, uninsured, other). On the basis of clinical plausibility and available evidence [1, 17, 18, 27, 48, 49], we selected several comorbidities that potentially could act as confounders in the associations between opioid abuse and dependence and postoperative events: AIDS and HIV infection, tobacco use, chronic anemia, alcohol abuse and dependence, depression, anxiety, and nonopioid drug abuse and dependence. The nonopioid drugs—illicit and prescription drugs used illicitly—considered were cannabis (ICD-9-CM codes 305.2x, 304.3x), hallucinogens (ICD-9-CM codes 305.3x, 304.5x), sedatives/hypnotics/anxiolytics (ICD-9-CM codes 305.4x, 304.1x), cocaine (ICD-9-CM codes 305.6x, 304.2x), amphetamines (ICD-9-CM codes 305.7x, 304.4x), antidepressants (ICD-9-CM code 305.8x), and other/unspecified substances (ICD-9-CM codes 305.9x, 304.6x, 304.8x, 304.9x) [33]. Patients with opioid and nonopioid drug abuse and dependence were counted as having a diagnosis of opioid abuse and dependence.

By using ICD-9-CM codes, we decided, a priori, to consider the following in-hospital adverse events owing to their incidence and effect in the perioperative orthopaedic surgery setting [6, 41]: myocardial infarction (410.xx), pneumonia (481, 482.x, 483.x, 484.x, 485, 486, 997.31, 997.39), respiratory failure (518.51, 518.53, 518.81, 518.84), surgical site infection (996.67, 998.59), pulmonary embolism (415.1, 415.11, 415.13, 415.19), deep vein thrombosis (451.11, 451.19, 451.2, 451.81, 451.9, 453.40-2, 453.8-9), acute renal failure (584.x), postoperative ileus or other gastrointestinal events (997.49, 560.1, 560.9, 560.81, 536.2, 537.3), induced mental disorder, including delirium and other confusional states (291.x, 292.x, 293.x), and mechanical ventilation (93.90, 96.70-72).

Statistical Analysis

Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association of opioid abuse and dependence with predetermined study endpoints: inpatient mortality and adverse events, failure to rescue (death after an adverse event) [21], prolonged LOS (> 75th percentile for each procedure) [15], and nonroutine discharge (discharged to a location other than home). All covariates (patient demographics, individual comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and procedure type) were defined a priori and entered into the models simultaneously without further selection. In addition to reporting multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs, we present unadjusted OR and age-adjusted OR. We report age-adjusted OR because age was the most important confounder in the models.

There are some factors that are difficult to address in healthcare utilization data, including socioeconomic background, health literacy, diet, and nutritional status, which may influence our study endpoints. Therefore, we performed a sensitivity analysis restricted to patients with either opioid or nonopioid drug abuse and dependence [33]. Our assumption was that patients with opioid or other drug abuse and dependence were more likely to be similar in terms of potentially important unmeasured confounders than patients drawn from the general orthopaedic patient population. Thus, comparing patients with opioid abuse and dependence with patients with nonopioid drug disorders might facilitate identification of adverse inpatient events that are more likely to be causally related to the opioid abuse and dependence. As the total number of events for certain endpoints (mortality, respiratory failure, surgical site infection, myocardial infarction, thromboembolic events, and failure to rescue) precluded fitting a multivariable model that included all of the predetermined confounding variables, we decided to adjust only for age (our most important confounder) in these circumstances.

Additionally, we conducted a second sensitivity analysis to determine the association of opioid abuse and opioid dependence as separate groups with inpatient mortality, morbidity, and resource use. Although discerning between these two entities is clinically difficult, we sought to determine whether membership in these individual groups is uniquely associated with adverse events, as abuse is considered more a behavioral disorder, and dependence a physiologic state induced by chronic opioid intake [50, 51].

As a secondary aim, we constructed a multivariate logistic regression model using the enter method to determine which factors were independently associated with opioid abuse and dependence in the perioperative orthopaedic setting.

Results

Among all hospitalizations for major elective orthopaedic surgery, the rate of opioid abuse and dependence was 0.2% (15,901 of 9,307,348; Table 1). The prevalence of opioid abuse and dependence in orthopaedic surgery increased by 152% during the 10-year study period, from 0.95 per 1000 discharges in 2002 to 2.4 per 1000 discharges in 2011 (p for trend, < 0.001; Fig. 1). The prevalence of opioid abuse and dependence was particularly high among patients younger than 55 years (3.9 per 1000 discharges; Fig. 1). Spinal fusion was the orthopaedic procedure with the highest prevalence of patients who had opioid abuse and dependence, with an upward trend of abuse and dependence with time (from 1.7 per 1000 discharges in 2002 to 3.6 per 1000 discharges in 2011; Fig. 2).

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population
Fig. 1
figure 1

The graph shows opioid abuse and dependence per 1000 orthopaedic inpatients, overall and by age, in the United States from 2001 to 2011.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The graph shows opioid abuse and dependence per 1000 orthopaedic inpatients by procedure type in the United States from 2002 to 2011. TSA = total shoulder arthroplasty.

After adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, procedure type, and hospital characteristics in multivariate modeling (Table 2), opioid abuse and dependence were associated with increased inpatient mortality (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 2.7–5.1) and aggregate morbidity (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.2–2.4), including (in decreasing order of magnitude of effect estimate): induced mental disorder (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 5.4–6.3), respiratory failure (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.7–3.6), surgical site infection (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.0–3.0), mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.0–2.5), pneumonia (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.8–2.3), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3–2.6), and postoperative ileus or other gastrointestinal events (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3–1.6). Opioid abuse and dependence were also associated with greater risk for prolonged LOS (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.4–2.5), nonroutine discharge (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 2.2–2.3), and failure to rescue (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4–2.8) (p < 0.001 for all listed entities). We found no relationship between opioid abuse and dependence and the development of acute renal failure or thromboembolic events. In sensitivity analyses restricted to patients who were opioid and nonopioid-dependent or opioid-abusing (Table 3), opioid abuse and dependence were independently associated with increased mortality (age-adjusted OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3–3.4), mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5–2.1), respiratory failure (age-adjusted OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5–2.3), surgical site infection (age-adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2–2.2), pneumonia (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3–1.8), postoperative ileus or other gastrointestinal events (age-adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1–1.6), failure to rescue (age-adjusted OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4–4.2), prolonged LOS (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6–1.8), and nonhomebound discharge (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.3–1.4). Opioid abuse and dependence were not associated with the occurrence of myocardial infarction, thromboembolic events, and induced mental disorder, but were linked to decreased likelihood of acute renal failure (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62–0.92). When assessing associations of inpatient events with opioid abuse and dependence as separate groups (Appendix 1. Supplemental materials are available with the online version of CORR®), opioid dependence generally exerted more influence (higher OR) on every event, with the exceptions of surgical site infection and failure to rescue.

Table 2 Associations between opioid-use disorder and perioperative outcomes after orthopaedic surgery
Table 3 Associations between opioid versus nonopioid drug-use disorder and perioperative outcomes after orthopaedic surgery

Patient-related factors associated with opioid abuse and dependence during the perioperative orthopaedic setting included decreasing age (OR, 0.70 per 10-year increase, 95% CI, 0.70–0.71), male sex (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4–1.5), black race (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1–1.3), Hispanic (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.02–1.2), and public insurance (Medicaid: OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.3–2.5; Medicare: OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3–1.4). We were unable to control for important patient-level factors (eg, socioeconomic background, homelessness, health literacy, diet, nutritional status). In decreasing order of magnitude, the comorbidities associated with opioid abuse and dependence consisted of nonopioid drug abuse and dependence (OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 5.6–6.5), alcohol abuse and dependence (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 3.5–4.0), AIDS/HIV infection (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 4.1–5.9), depression (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.7–2.9), tobacco use (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.3–2.5), anxiety (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 2.0–2.3), and chronic anemia (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.5–1.6). Compared with THA, spinal fusion was the only procedure linked to opioid abuse and dependence (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.04–1.1). Hospital-related characteristics associated with opioid abuse and dependence included location in an urban area (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.5–1.8) and in the Northeast (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.5–1.7) or West (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.3–2.5, compared with the South), and teaching setting (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.3–1.4) (Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariate analysis of factors associated with opioid-use disorder in elective orthopaedic surgery

Discussion

Opioids often are prescribed for management of nonmalignant musculoskeletal pain [3, 12, 14, 32, 54] and orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than surgeons from any other surgical specialty and are third in line after primary care physicians and internists even though these top two groups are more numerous [52]. As a result, more than 16,000 deaths per year and USD 55 billion of increased costs have been attributed to overuse of opioids [7, 29]. During the last one to two decades, there has been a dramatic increase in preoperative use of opioid medications in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery [14, 56]. Yet little is known regarding the effect of this trend on perioperative morbidity and mortality in this patient group. Our findings show that opioid abuse and dependence are increasing rapidly among orthopaedic surgical inpatients and are associated with a marked increase in the risk of postoperative mortality, morbidity, and resource use.

Our study was subject to several limitations inherent to the analysis of data originally intended for billing purposes [20, 24]. First, as in all claims-based studies, coding misclassification can occur. It has been shown that administrative data tend to have high specificity (that is, a low false-positive rate) but low sensitivity (a high false-negative rate) in identifying comorbidities and complications [11, 22]. Thus, if anything, our data source underestimates the prevalence of opioid abuse and dependence. Because the NIS contains no personal identifiers, validation of diagnoses and procedures through cross-referencing medical records was not possible. Since the use of different large datasets can generate disparate results [5, 8, 9], it would be interesting to compare our findings in the NIS with those of other administrative databases (eg, the National Hospital Discharge Survey) and clinical registries (eg, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [NSQIP]). However, the NSQIP currently does not capture data regarding opioid use. Another limitation was our inability to adjust for opioid exposure patterns (such as timing, duration, and amount) and classes of opioid drugs, which might influence events. It is possible that some patients with a coded opioid abuse and dependence diagnosis had low-level use of opioids. However, if this had been the case, the prevalence of opioid abuse and dependence in our study would have been much higher than 0.2%. For instance, in a recent study of patients undergoing spine surgery, 56% reported some degree of preoperative opioid use [32]. Third, the availability of 10 more diagnosis codes in the NIS starting in 2009 might explain some of the noted increase in opioid abuse and dependence although this seems unlikely, given that very few patients have more than 15 diagnoses. Fourth, as it often is difficult to distinguish between opioid abuse and dependence in the hospital setting, we decided to combine the two entities for the primary analysis—an approach that is consistent with the definition of “opioid use disorder” in the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) [2, 4]. In our sensitivity analysis restricted to patients who abused opioids and those who were dependent on opioids, most associations with mortality, morbidity, and resource use remained significant in both cohorts. Fifth, we were unable to document postdischarge events, which limited the interpretation of the effect of opioid abuse and dependence on patients having orthopaedic surgery. Sixth, multiple comparisons in our analysis increase the possibility of false-positive associations (type I error), and the presented findings should be confirmed in other populations and data settings. Finally, results in large-scale studies can be statistically significant yet clinically insignificant. The reader, therefore, should consider whether findings with relatively small effects sizes are clinically relevant and not influenced by unmeasured confounders (eg, association of nonwhite race/ethnicity with opioid misuse). The effect size for many of the associations that we reported are large (> 2), and thus are likely to be clinically important.

In our sample, approximately one in 500 (0.2%) patients undergoing major elective orthopaedic surgery was coded as abusing or dependent on opioids. We identified a considerable increase (152%) in the prevalence of coding for opioid abuse and dependence among orthopaedic inpatients with time. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to report the incremental prevalence of opioid misuse in the perioperative orthopaedic surgery setting. It is possible that, to some extent, the observed increase in opioid abuse and dependence might be related to growing awareness of these disorders by coders who might be more likely to prioritize and include ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for opioid misuse. Maeda et al. [33] recently reported that the prevalence of opioid abuse and dependence in women hospitalized for delivery across the United States increased by 127%, from 1.7 per 1000 delivery admissions in 1998 to 3.9 per 1000 delivery admissions in 2011. Although the observed frequency of opioid abuse and dependence among orthopaedic surgical inpatients could be considered small, the clinical and economic burdens to healthcare systems are substantial [30, 36, 40, 44].

Patients with opioid abuse and dependence undergoing orthopaedic surgery had increased odds of early postoperative morbidity and mortality and also were more likely to experience a prolonged and complicated recovery, as reflected by the longer hospital LOS and increased nonroutine discharge. It is well established that patients with opioid-use disorders have a tolerance develop to the analgesic effects of opioids and require higher doses to obtain adequate pain relief postoperatively [19], yet they are just as vulnerable as the general population to the sedative effects of opioids, which may explain the increased odds of respiratory compromise, mechanical ventilation, and mortality in our analysis. The recognized difficulty in achieving adequate pain control among patients with opioid abuse and dependence was likely one of the main reasons for longer LOS; this finding was consistent with a recent study among women hospitalized for delivery in the United States [33]. Although functional outcomes were not assessed in our study, the greater need for posthospitalization care could further be interpreted as a less rapid return of independent functional mobility in this patient population [38, 39]. It is possible that lower levels of self-efficacy for managing pain—greater pain catastrophizing—and resilience in maintaining function among chronic opioid users contributed to the higher rate of posthospitalization care observed in our study [26, 47], and also may partly explain why these patients tend to have worse functional outcomes after orthopaedic procedures [31, 32, 42, 57].

Opioid prescriptions have increased dramatically during the last two decades, largely driven by concerns in the late 1990s about the undertreatment of pain. This has been accompanied by relaxation of laws regarding governing prescribing opioids for treatment of chronic noncancer pain, marketing by the pharmaceutical industry, and promotion of opioids by numerous physicians. We found that high-risk opioid users were more likely to be younger, male, nonwhite, Medicaid-insured patients, with mental health and substance-use disorders, undergoing spine surgery. However, the ORs suggesting more opioid misuse in black and Hispanic patients were small and likely could be explained by factors not accounted for in our analysis (eg, differences in coding practices between different types of hospitals, poverty, homelessness, health literacy). In agreement with data from the primary care and interventional pain management settings [28, 34], high-risk use of opioids was more common in younger patients. Our finding that male sex was associated with opioid abuse and dependence is consistent with prior research using claims data to identify patients at risk for inappropriate opioid use [46, 55]. The observation that patients having spinal fusion showed the highest prevalence of opioid abuse and dependence was not surprising given that opioids play an increasingly pivotal role in the long-term management of chronic back pain, which is the primary reason for patients to undergo such procedures [13, 14]. Patients with mental health and nonopioid substance use disorders had greater odds of abusing or being dependent on opioids, thus confirming the generalizability of previous studies to orthopaedic surgical inpatients [16, 17, 46, 49, 55]. Quality and safety initiatives aimed at reducing opioid misuse in the orthopaedic setting should primarily target this at-risk population, and be particularly implemented at urban teaching hospitals in the Northeast and West that function as “safety net” providers. The geographic variation in opioid misuse should be examined more closely to determine whether policies and laws, enforcement level, physician-prescribing practices, or other factors contribute to these differences.

Despite the limitations associated with data analysis from healthcare utilization databases, our study provided evidence that high-risk opioid use is increasing among patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery and was associated with a greater likelihood of in-hospital postoperative morbidity and mortality and healthcare resource utilization. These findings call for further development of multidisciplinary approaches to effectively reduce opioid prescribing and associated adverse consequences in the orthopaedic surgery setting. We recommend that orthopaedic surgeons screen patients carefully for opioid misuse preoperatively, help patients who are using opioids inappropriately to discontinue them before scheduling elective surgery, decline to perform elective surgery in patients who misuse opioids, and closely monitor patients who are habituated to opioids at the time they undergo surgery.