Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Open versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Survey
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common compressive neuropathy of the median nerve. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release remain controversial.

Questions/purposes

The purpose of this study was to determine whether endoscopic compared with open carpal tunnel release provides better symptom relief, validated outcome scores, short- and long-term strength, and/or digital sensibility; entails a differential risk of complications such as nerve injury, scar tenderness, pillar pain, and reoperation; allows an earlier return to work; and takes less operative time.

Methods

The English-language literature was searched using MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomized controlled trials that compared endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release were included in the meta-analysis. Methodologic quality was assessed with the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist, and a sensitivity analysis was performed. Symptom relief, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores, strength, digital sensibility, complications, reoperation, interval to return to work, and operative time were analyzed. Twenty-one randomized controlled trials containing 1859 hands were included.

Results

Endoscopically treated patients showed similar symptom relief and BCTQ scores; better early recovery of grip strength (mean difference [MD], 3.03 kg [0.08–5.98]; p = 0.04) and pinch strength (MD, 0.77 kg [0.33–1.22]; p < 0.001) but no advantage after 6 months; lower risk of scar tenderness (risk ratio [RR], 0.53 [0.35–0.82]; p = 0.005); higher risk of nerve injury (RR, 2.84 [1.08–7.46]; p = 0.03), most of which were transient neurapraxias. Similar risk of pillar pain and reoperation; an earlier return to work (MD, −8.73 days [−12.82 to −4.65]; p < 0.001); and reduced operative time (MD, −4.81 minutes [−9.23 to −0.39]; p = 0.03).

Conclusions

High-level evidence from randomized controlled trials indicates that endoscopic release allows earlier return to work and improved strength during the early postoperative period. Results at 6 months or later are similar according to current data except that patients undergoing endoscopic release are at greater risk of nerve injury and lower risk of scar tenderness compared with open release. While endoscopic release may appeal to patients who require an early return to work and activities, surgeons should be cognizant of its elevated incidence of transient nerve injury amid its similar overall efficacy to open carpal tunnel release. Additional research is required to define the learning curve of endoscopic release and clarify the influence of surgeon volume on its safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A–B
Fig. 4A–B
Fig. 5A–B
Fig. 6A–B
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agee JM, McCarroll HR Jr, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Szabo RM, Peimer CA. Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17:987–995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aslani HR, Alizadeh K, Eajazi A, Karimi A, Karimi MH, Zaferani Z, Hosseini Khameneh SM. Comparison of carpal tunnel release with three different techniques. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:965–968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atroshi I, Hofer M, Larsson GU, Ornstein E, Johnsson R, Ranstam J. Open compared with 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:266–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Atroshi I, Larsson GU, Ornstein E, Hofer M, Johnsson R, Ranstam J. Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2006;332:1473.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown RA, Gelberman RH, Seiler JG 3rd, Abrahamsson SO, Weiland AJ, Urbaniak JR, Schoenfeld DA, Furcolo D. Carpal tunnel release: a prospective, randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1265–1275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow JC. Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy. 1989;5:19–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung KC, Walters MR, Greenfield ML, Chernew ME. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1089–1099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cobb TK, Knudson GA, Cooney WP. The use of topographical landmarks to improve the outcome of Agee endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy. 1995;11:165–172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cseuz KA, Thomas JE, Lambert EH, Love JG, Lipscomb PR. Long-term results of operation for carpal tunnel syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 1966;41:232–241.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dumontier C, Sokolow C, Leclercq C, Chauvin P. Early results of conventional versus two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective study. J Hand Surg Br. 1995;20:658–662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ejiri S, Kikuchi S, Maruya M, Sekiguchi Y, Kawakami R, Konno S. Short-term results of endoscopic (Okutsu method) versus palmar incision open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2012;58:49–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Erdmann MW. Endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19:5–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Erhard L, Ozalp T, Citron N, Foucher G. Carpal tunnel release by the Agee endoscopic technique: results at 4 year follow-up. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24:583–585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferdinand RD, MacLean JG. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomised, blinded assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:375–379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed April 1, 2014.

  16. Jacobsen MB, Rahme H. A prospective, randomized study with an independent observer comparing open carpal tunnel release with endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Br. 1996;21:202–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang HJ, Koh IH, Lee TJ, Choi YR. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release is preferred over mini-open despite similar outcome: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:1548–1554.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly CP, Pulisetti D, Jamieson AM. Early experience with endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19:18–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kulick MI, Gordillo G, Javidi T, Kilgore ES Jr, Newmeyer WL 3rd. Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1986;11:59–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Larsen MB, Sorensen AI, Crone KL, Weis T, Boeckstyns ME. Carpal tunnel release: a randomized comparison of three surgical methods. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013;38:646–650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:820–826.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Learmonth J. The principle of decompression in the treatment of certain diseases of peripheral nerves. Surg Clin North Am. 1933;13:905–913.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, Katz JN. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1585–1592.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Louis DS, Greene TL, Noellert RC. Complications of carpal tunnel surgery. J Neurosurg. 1985;62:352–356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Roth JH, Ross DC, King GJ. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized trial. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28:475–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. MacDonald RI, Lichtman DM, Hanlon JJ, Wilson JN. Complications of surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1978;3:70–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mackenzie DJ, Hainer R, Wheatley MJ. Early recovery after endoscopic vs. short-incision open carpal tunnel release. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;44:601–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Dua A, Mallinath SG, Bhan S. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a short-term comparative study. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41:57–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Murphy RX Jr, Jennings JF, Wukich DK. Major neurovascular complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19:114–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Owings MF, Kozak LJ. Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1996. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Care Survey. No 139. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_13/sr13_139.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.

  32. Palmer DH, Paulson JC, Lane-Larsen CL, Peulen VK, Olson JD. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a comparison of two techniques with open release. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:498–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Phalen GS. The carpal-tunnel syndrome: seventeen years’ experience in diagnosis and treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48:211–228.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rab M, Grunbeck M, Beck H, Haslik W, Schrogendorfer KF, Schiefer HP, Mittlbock M, Frey M. Intra-individual comparison between open and 2-portal endoscopic release in clinically matched bilateral carpal syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:730–736.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saw NL, Jones S, Shepstone L, Meyer M, Chapman PG, Logan AM. Early outcome and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized prospective trial. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28:444–449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Semple JC, Cargill AO. Carpal-tunnel syndrome: results of surgical decompression. Lancet. 1969;1:918–919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sennwald GR, Benedetti R. The value of one-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3:113–116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Seradge H, Seradge E. Piso-triquetral pain syndrome after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14:858–862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thoma A, Veltri K, Haines T, Duku E. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1137–1146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tian Y, Zhao H, Wang T. Prospective comparison of endoscopic and open surgical methods for carpal tunnel syndrome. Chin Med Sci J. 2007;22:104–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Trumble TE, Diao E, Abrams RA, Gilbert-Anderson MM. Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1107–1115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vasiliadis HS, Georgoulas P, Shrier I, Salanti G, Scholten RJ. Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD008265.

  44. Wong KC, Hung LK, Ho PC, Wong JM. Carpal tunnel release: a prospective, randomised study of endoscopic versus limited-open methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:863–868.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH11-1119, New York, NY, 10032-3784, USA

    Eli T. Sayegh BS & Robert J. Strauch MD

Authors
  1. Eli T. Sayegh BS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert J. Strauch MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Strauch MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayegh, E.T., Strauch, R.J. Open versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473, 1120–1132 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3835-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3835-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation