Skip to main content
Log in

The Otto Aufranc Award: Modifiable versus Nonmodifiable Risk Factors for Infection After Hip Arthroplasty

  • Symposium: 2014 Hip Society Proceedings
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

A CORR Insights to this article was published on 13 August 2014

Abstract

Background

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are associated with increased morbidity and cost. It would be important to identify any modifiable patient- and surgical-related factors that could be modified before surgery to decrease the risk of PJI.

Questions/purposes

We sought to identify and quantify the magnitude of modifiable risk factors for deep PJIs after primary hip arthroplasty.

Methods

A series of 3672 primary and 406 revision hip arthroplasties performed at a single specialty hospital over a 3-year period were reviewed. All deep PJIs were identified using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case definitions (ie, occurs within 30–90 days postoperatively, involves deep soft tissues of the incision, purulent drainage, dehiscence and fever, localized pain or tenderness). Univariate and multivariate analyses determined the association between patient and surgical risk factors and PJIs. For the elective patients, the procedure was performed on the day of admission (“same-day procedure”), whereas for the fracture and nonelective patients, the procedure was performed 1 or more days postadmission (“nonsame-day procedure”). Staphylococcus aureus colonization, tobacco use, and body mass index (BMI) were defined as patient-related modifiable risk factors.

Results

Forty-seven (1.3%) deep PJIs were identified. Infection developed in 20 of 363 hips of nonsame-day procedures and 27 of 3309 same-day procedures (p = 0.006). There were eight (2%) infections in the revision group. After controlling for confounding variables, our multivariate analysis showed that BMI ≧ 40 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3–12.88; p = 0.01), operating time > 115 minutes (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.23–9.28; p = 0.018), nonsame-day surgery (OR, 4.16; 95% CI, 1.44–12.02; p = 0.008), and revision surgery (OR, 4.23; 95% CI, 1.67–10.72; p < 0.001) are significant risk factors for PJIs. Tobacco use and S aureus colonization were additive risk factors when combined with other significant risk factors (OR, 12.76; 95% CI, 2.47–66.16; p = 0.017).

Conclusions

Nonsame-day hip and revision arthroplasties have higher infection rates than same-day primary surgeries. These characteristics are not modifiable and should be categorized as a separate cohort for complication-reporting purposes. Potentially modifiable risk factors in our patient population include operating time, elevated BMI, tobacco use, and S aureus colonization. Modifying risk factors may decrease the incidence of PJIs. When reporting deep PJI rates, stratification into preventable versus nonpreventable infections may provide a better assessment of performance on an institutional and individual surgeon level.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, Steckelberg JM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS, Osmon DR. Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:1247–1254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, Ong K, Rubash H, Vail TP, Berry DJ. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;2:794–800.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Healthcare Safety Networks (CDC/NHSN). 2013 Protocol Corrections, Clarification, and Additions. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdf/pscmanual/errata2013.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2013

  4. de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Rotstein C, Weening B, Royston K, Winemaker M. Antibiotic prophylaxis for total joint replacement surgery: results of a survey of Canadian orthopedic surgeons. Can J Surg. 2009;52:229–234

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dowsey MM, Choong P. Obese diabetic patients are at substantial risk for deep infection after primary TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1577–1581.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hacek DM, Robb WJ, Paule SM, Kudrna JC, Stamos VP, Peterson LR. Staphylococcus aureus nasal decolonization in joint replacement surgery reduces infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1349–1355

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanssen AD, Ransen J. Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:111–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Frampton C, Wyatt MC. Does the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early deep infection after total hip and knee replacement? The ten-year results of the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:85–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iarikov D, Demian H, Rubin D, Alexander J, Nambiar S. Choice and doses of antibacterial agents for cement spacers in treatment of prosthetic joint infections: review of published studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1474–1480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iorio R, Williams KM, Marcantonio AJ, Specht LM, Tilzey JF, Healy WL. Diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin A1C, and the incidence of total joint arthroplasty infection. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:726–729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jämsen E, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Konttinen YT, Odgaard A, Stefánsdóttir A, Lidgren L. Prevention of deep infection in joint replacement surgery. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:660–666.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson AJ, Daley JA, Zywiel MG, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Preoperative chlorhexidine preparation and the incidence of surgical site infections after hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:98–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kapadia BH, Johnson AJ, Issa K, Mont MA. Economic evaluation of chlorhexidine cloths on healthcare costs due to surgical site infections following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1061–1065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27:97–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marchant MH Jr, Viens NA, Cook C, Vail TP, Bolognesi MP. The impact of glycemic control and diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1621–1629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Møller AM, Villebro N, Pedersen T, Tonnesen H. Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2002;359:114–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muilwijk J, Walenkamp GH, Voss A, Wille JC, van den Hof S. Random effect modelling of patient-related risk factors in orthopaedic procedures: results fromthe Dutch nosocomial infection surveillance network ‘PREZIES.’ J Hosp Infect. 2006;62:319–326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peersman G, Laskin R., Davis J, Peterson M. Infection in total knee replacement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Poss R, Thornhill TS, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Batte NJ, Sledge CB. Factors influencing the incidence and outcome of infection following total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;182:117–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1710–1715.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ridgeway S, Wilson J, Charlet A, Kafatos G, Pearson A, Coello R. Infection of the surgical site after arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:844–850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Urquhart DM, Hanna FS, Brennan SL, Wluka AE, Leder K, Cameron PA, Graves SE, Cicuttini FM. Incidence and risk factors for deep surgical site infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1216–1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van Kasteren ME, Mannien J, Ott A, Kullberg BJ, de Boer AS, Gyssens IC. Antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections following total hip arthroplasty: timely administration is the most important factor. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:921–927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yano K, Minoda Y, Sakawa A, Kuwano Y, Kondo K, Fukushima W, Tada K. Positive nasal culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a risk factor for surgical site infection in orthopedics. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:486–490.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1645–1654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Iorio MD.

Additional information

One or more of the authors certifies that he (JB, RI), or a member of his or her immediate family, has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, an amount of USD 10,000 to USD 100,000 from 3M (Minneapolis, MN, USA) and USD 10,000 to USD 100,000 from IMDS (Orlando, FL, USA) and Kyocera (Kyoto, Japan).

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained (if applicable).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maoz, G., Phillips, M., Bosco, J. et al. The Otto Aufranc Award: Modifiable versus Nonmodifiable Risk Factors for Infection After Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473, 453–459 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3780-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3780-x

Keywords

Navigation