Skip to main content
Log in

Cruciate-retaining TKA Is an Option in Patients With Prior Patellectomy

  • Symposium: 2014 Knee Society Proceedings
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

The recommendation for using posterior-stabilized (PS) implants in patellectomy patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is based on older case series with heterogeneous patient populations. The use of cruciate-retaining implants in these patients has not been evaluated with more contemporary implant designs.

Questions/purposes

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship and functional outcomes (Knee Society score, presence of an extensor lag, and range of motion) of cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA in patients with prior patellectomy.

Methods

Between 1986 and 2012, we performed 27 CR TKAs in 25 patients after patellectomy. Of those, 23 CR TKAs in 21 patients were available for followup at a minimum of 2 years (mean, 11.2 years; range, 2.3–25.1 years). In this retrospective study, we queried a prospectively maintained database to assess functional outcomes and survivorship.

Results

Aseptic loosening-free survival was 100% at 5 and 10 years, and survival with revision for any reason as the outcome was 96% at 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.7%–100%) and 84% at 10 years (95% CI, 69.5%–100%). One patient was revised for aseptic loosening at 10.2 years postoperatively. Mean Knee Society scores improved from 36 ± 13 preoperatively to 92 ± 9.6 at followup. Extensor lag was present in seven patients preoperatively and only three at followup. Average knee flexion at followup was 112° ± 12.5°.

Conclusions

In this study we found good long-term survivorship and functional outcomes with a CR implant design in patients following patellectomy. Earlier studies have favored PS over CR implants for patients with patellectomies. We believe this series suggests that CR TKA is indeed an option in patients with patellectomy.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Ashour A, Saintmard B, Aubaniac JM. The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:638–644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bayne O, Cameru HU. Total knee arthroplasty following patellectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:112–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cameron HU, Cungen HU, Vyamont D. Posterior stabilized knee prosthesis for total knee replacement in patients with prior patellectomy. Can J Surg. 1996;39:469–473.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cameron HU, Fedorkow DM. The patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;165:197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron HU, Jung YB. Prosthetic replacement of the arthritic knee after patellectomy. Can J Surg. 1990;33:119–121.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dahiya V, Gupta H, Rajgopal A, Vasdev A. Midterm results of cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty in patellectomized patients. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47:31–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang JD, Papas SN, Rubash HE, McClain EJ Jr. Total knee arthroplasty in patellectomized patients. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:489–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keenan AC, Wood AM, Arthur CA, Jenkins PJ, Brenkel IJ, Walmsley PJ. Ten-year survival of cemented total knee replacement in patients aged less than 55 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:928–931.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Larson KR, Cracchiolo A, Dorey FJ, Finerman GAM. Total knee arthroplasty in patients after patellectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;264:243–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lennox DW, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA. Total knee arthroplasty following patellectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;223:220–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin SD, Haas SB, Insall JN. Primary total knee arthroplasty after patellectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1323–1330.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Niinimäki T, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä K, Ohtonen P, Puhto AP, Remes V. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov 19 [Epub ahead of print].

  14. Paletta GA Jr, Laskin RS. Total knee arthroplasty after a previous patellectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1708–1712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sledge C, Ewald F. Total knee arthroplasty experience at the Robert Breck Brigham Hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;145:78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Therneau T. A package for survival analysis in S. R package version 2.37-4. 2013. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival. Accessed July 2013.

  17. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Yao R, Lyons MC, Howard JL, McAuley JP. Does patellectomy jeopardize function after TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;417:544–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith R. Reinhardt MD.

Additional information

Two of the authors certify that he (TST, RDS), or a member of his immediate family, has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, an amount of more than USD 1,000,001 from DePuy (Warsaw, IN, USA).

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reinhardt, K.R., Huffaker, S.J., Thornhill, T.S. et al. Cruciate-retaining TKA Is an Option in Patients With Prior Patellectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473, 111–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3758-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3758-8

Keywords

Navigation