Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Factors for the Development of Heterotopic Ossification After Acetabular Fracture Fixation

  • Symposium: Fractures of the Acetabulum
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication of the operative treatment of acetabular fractures. Although the surgical approach has been shown to correlate with the development of ectopic bone, specific risk factors have not been elucidated.

Questions/purposes

The purposes of this study were to determine specific risk factors associated with the development of severe HO and the frequency with which patients develop severe HO after acetabular fracture fixation through an isolated Kocher-Langenbeck approach.

Methods

Using an institutional orthopaedic trauma database at a regional Level I trauma center, patients undergoing open treatment of acetabular fractures during the study period (January 2000 to January 2010) were identified. A review of medical records and imaging studies was performed on 508 patients who were treated by the senior author (MR) through an isolated Kocher-Langenbeck approach. During the study period, the senior author used indomethacin for HO prophylaxis in patients who had ipsilateral femur fracture treated with antegrade reamed medullary nailing or severe local soft tissue injury; 49 (10%) of the patients he treated with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach received prophylaxis, and they were excluded from this study, leaving a total of 459 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of those, 147 (29%) were lost to followup or did not have radiographs both before and at a minimum of 6 weeks (median, 1 week; range, 0–3 weeks), leaving 312 (61% of the patients treated with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach during this time) available for this analysis. Demographic data as well as information related to cause of injury, associated periacetabular findings, other system injuries, and treatment were gathered. Final followup radiographs were assessed for the presence of ectopic bone by two of the authors (TJO, AS) using the modified Brooker classification. Logistic regression was performed to identify possible predictors of development of severe ectopic bone.

Results

The only predictor we identified for the development of severe HO was the need for prolonged mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.9–17.3; p = 0.001). Injury Severity Score, sex, presence of comminution, femoral head impaction, dislocation, degloving injury, debris in the joint, number of other fractures, and head and chest Abbreviated Injury Score > 2 did not correlate with severe HO. Severe HO (Brooker Class III or IV) developed in 38 of 312 patients (12%).

Conclusions

Patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation might benefit from HO prophylaxis given the increased risk of developing severe HO in this patient population. However, future prospective studies need to be performed to verify this finding given the fact that a considerable number of patients were prophylactically treated in this study.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, prognosticstudy. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alonso J, Davila R, Bradley E. Extended iliofemoral versus triradiate approaches in management of associated acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:81–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray T, Esser M, Fulkerson L. Osteotomy of the trochanter in open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:711–717.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooker A, Bowerman J, Robinson R, Riley LJ. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629–1632.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burd T, Hughes M, Anglen J. The floating hip: complications and outcomes. J Trauma. 2008;64:442–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Daum W, Scarborough M, Gordon W, Uchida T. Heterotopic ossification and other perioperative complications of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:427–432.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ebraheim N, Patil V, Liu J, Haman S. Sliding trochanteric osteotomy in acetabular fractures: a review of 30 cases. Injury. 2007;38:1177–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghalambor N, Matta J, Bernstein L. Heterotopic ossification following operative treatment of acetabular fracture. An analysis of risk factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:96–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffin D, Beaule P, Matta J. Safety and efficacy of the extended iliofemoral approach in the treatment of complex fractures of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1391–1396.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffin S, Sims S, Karunakar M, Seymour R, Haines N. Heterotopic ossification rates after acetabular fracture surgery are unchanged without indomethacin prophylaxis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2776–2782.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Heck B, Ebraheim N, Foetisch C. Direct complications of trochanteric osteotomy in open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997;26:124–128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heeg M, Klasen H, Visser J. Operative treatment for acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:383–386.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson E, Kay R, Dorey F. Heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following operative treatment of acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:88–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson E, Matta J, Mast J, Letournel E. Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures 21–120 days following injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:20–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaempffe F, Bone L, Border J. Open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures: heterotopic ossification and other complications of treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5:439–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Karunakar M, Sen A, Bosse J, Sims S, Goulet J, Kellam J. Indomethacin as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification after the operative treatment of fractures of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1613–1617.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;151:81–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marks P, Paley D, Kellam J. Heterotopic ossification around the hip with intramedullary nailing of the femur. J Trauma. 1988;28:1207–1213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matta J, Merritt P. Displaced acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;230:83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Matta J, Siebenrock K. Does indomethacin reduce heterotopic bone formation after operations for acetabular fractures? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:959–963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mills W, Tejwani N. Heterotopic ossification after knee dislocation: the predictive value of the injury severity score. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:338–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moed B, Karges D. Prophylactic indomethacin for the prevention of heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture surgery in high-risk patients. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8:34–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moed B, Smith S. Three-view radiographic assessment of heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:93–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pape H, Lehmann U, van Griensven M, Gansslen A, von Glinski S, Krettek C. Heterotopic ossifications in patients after severe blunt trauma with and without head trauma: incidence and patterns of distribution. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:229–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pennal G, Davidson J, Garside H, Plewes J. Results of treatment of acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;151:115–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Petsatodis G, Antonarakos P, Chalidis B, Papadopoulos P, Christoforidis J, Pournaras J. Surgically treated acetabular fractures via a single posterior approach with a follow-up of 2–10 years. Injury. 2007;38:334–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rath E, Russell GJ, Washington W, Routt MJ. Gluteus minimus necrotic muscle débridement diminishes heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture fixation. Injury. 2002;33:751–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Routt MJ, Swiontkowski M. Operative treatment of complex acetabular fractures. Combined anterior and posterior exposures during the same procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:897–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sagi H, Jordan C, Barei D, Serrano-Riera R, Steverson B. Indomethacin prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture surgery increases the risk for non-union of the posterior wall. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Mar 3 [Epub ahead of print].

  29. Starr A, Watson J, Reinert C, Jones A, Whitlock S, Griffin D, Borer D. Complications following the ‘T extensile’ approach: a modified extensile approach for acetabular fracture surgery—report of forty-three patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:535–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Steinberg G, Hubbard C. Heterotopic ossification after femoral intramedullay rodding. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7:536–542.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Triantaphillopoulos P, Panagiotopoulos E, Mousafiris C, Tyllianakis M, Dimakopoulos P, Lambiris E. Long-term results in surgically treated acetabular fractures through the posterior approaches. J Trauma. 2007;62:378–382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vavken P, Castellani L, Sculco TP. Prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification of the hip: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:3283–3289.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Webb L, Bosse M, Mayo K, Lange R, Miller M, Swiontkowski M. Results in patients with craniocerebral trauma and operatively managed acetabular fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4:376–382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Suzette Miranda and Jessica Schisel for editing assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Firoozabadi MD, MA.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Firoozabadi, R., O’Mara, T.J., Swenson, A. et al. Risk Factors for the Development of Heterotopic Ossification After Acetabular Fracture Fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 3383–3388 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3719-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3719-2

Keywords

Navigation