Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Classifications In Brief: Paprosky Classification of Acetabular Bone Loss

  • In Brief
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1A–F
Fig. 2

References

  1. Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:83–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Antonio JA. Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum: classification and management. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:279–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Griffin WL, Mayer JG. Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988:235;91–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gozzard C, Blom A, Taylor A, Smith E, Learmonth I. A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:638–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gross AE, Allan DG, Catre M, Garbuz DS, Stockley I. Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery: the pelvic side. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:679–695.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988:235;111–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johanson NA, Driftmier KR, Cerynik DL, Stehman CC. Grading acetabular defects: the need for a universal and valid system. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:425–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1487–1497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:33–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parry MC, Whitehouse MR, Mehendale SA, Smith LK, Webb JC, Spencer RF, Blom AW. A comparison of the validity and reliability of established bone stock loss classification systems and the proposal of a novel classification system. Hip Int. 2010;20:50–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Jaroszynski G, Wong P, Woodgate I, Davis A, Gross AE. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:50–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Paprosky WG. Acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:128–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6 suppl 2):83–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6 suppl 2):87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Valle CJ, Paprosky WG. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(suppl 4):1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws: a minimum twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1266–1271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu R, Hofstaetter JG, Sullivan T, Costi K, Howie DW, Solomon LB. Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2259–2265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 3565000, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Jessica J. M. Telleria MD & Albert O. Gee MD

Authors
  1. Jessica J. M. Telleria MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albert O. Gee MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica J. M. Telleria MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

About this article

Cite this article

Telleria, J.J.M., Gee, A.O. Classifications In Brief: Paprosky Classification of Acetabular Bone Loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 3725–3730 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3264-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3264-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation