Skip to main content
Log in

Loss of Cement-bone Interlock in Retrieved Tibial Components from Total Knee Arthroplasties

  • Basic Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

A CORR Insights® to this article was published on 26 September 2013

Abstract

Background

Aseptic loosening continues to be a short- and long-term complication for patients with cemented TKAs. Most studies to this point have evaluated tibial component fixation via radiographic changes at the implant-bone interface and quantification of component migration; direct assessment of morphologic features of the interface from functioning TKAs may provide new information regarding how TKAs function and are fixed to bone.

Questions/purposes

In a postmortem retrieval study, we asked: (1) What are the morphologic features at the cement-trabecular bone interface in retrieved tibial components? (2) Do constructs with greater time in service have less cement-trabecular bone interlock? (3) Do constructs with more estimated initial interlock sustain more interlock with in vivo service?

Methods

Fourteen postmortem retrieved tibial components with time in service from 0 to 20 years were sectioned and imaged at high resolution, and the current contact fraction, estimated initial interdigitation depth, current interdigitation depth, and loss of interdigitation depth were quantified at the cement-bone interface. Estimated initial interdigitation depth was calculated from the initial mold shape of the cement mantle that forms around the individual trabeculae at the time of surgery. Loss of interdigitation depth was the difference between the initial and current interdigitation depth.

Results

There was resorption of trabeculae that initially interlocked with the cement in the postmortem retrievals as evidenced by the differences between current interdigitation and the estimated original interdigitation. The current contact fraction (r2 = 0.54; p = 0.0027) and current interdigitation depth (r2 = 0.33; p = 0.033) were less for constructs with longer time in service. The current contact fraction for implants with 10 or more years in service (6.2%; 95% CI, 4.7%–7.7%) was much less than implants with less than 10 years in service (22.9%; 95% CI, 8.9%–37%). Similarly, the current interdigitation depth for implants with 10 or more years in service (0.4 mm; 95% CI, 0.27–0.53 mm) was much less than implants with less than 10 years in service (1.13 mm; 95% CI, 0.48–1.78 mm). The loss of interdigitation depth had a strong positive relationship with time in service (r2 = 0.74; p < 0.001). Using a two-parameter regression model, constructs with more initial interdigitation depth had greater current interdigitation depth (p = 0.011), but constructs with more time in service also had less current interdigitation depth (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The cement-trabecular bone interlock obtained initially appears to diminish with time with in vivo service by resorption of the trabeculae in the cement interlock region.

Clinical Relevance

Our study supports the surgical concept of obtaining sufficient initial cement interlock (approximately 3 mm), with the acknowledgment that there will be loss of interlock with time with in vivo service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–B
Fig. 2A–D
Fig. 3A–B
Fig. 4A–G
Fig. 5A–C
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Breer S, Krause M, Busse B, Hahn M, Ruther W, Morlock MM, Amling M, Zustin J. Analysis of retrieved hip resurfacing arthroplasties reveals the interrelationship between interface hyperosteoidosis and demineralization of viable bone trabeculae. J Orthop Res. 2012;30:1155–1161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cawley DT, Kelly N, McGarry JP, Shannon FJ. Cementing techniques for the tibial component in primary total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95:295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Charnley J. The reaction of bone to self-curing acrylic cement: a long-term histological study in man. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52:340–353.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ding M, Odgaard A, Hvid I. Changes in the three-dimensional microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone in early osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:906–912.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Draenert KD, Draenert YI, Krauspe R, Bettin D. Strain adaptive bone remodelling in total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:12–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gebert de Uhlenbrock A, Puschel V, Puschel K, Morlock MM, Bishop NE. Influence of time in-situ and implant type on fixation strength of cemented tibial trays: a post mortem retrieval analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012;27:929–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert JL, Hasenwinkel JM, Wixson RL, Lautenschlager EP. A theoretical and experimental analysis of polymerization shrinkage of bone cement: a potential major source of porosity. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52:210–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li MG, Nilsson KG. Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of 28 knees using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:40–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C, Lotke PA. Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:107–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:201–207.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu JX, Huang ZW, Tropiano P, Clouet D’Orval B, Remusat M, Dejou J, Proust JP, Poitout D. Human biological reactions at the interface between bone tissue and polymethylmethacrylate cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2002;13:803–809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mann KA, Miller MA. Fluid-structure interactions in micro-interlocked regions of the cement-bone interface. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2013 Mar 13. [Epub ahead of print].

  14. Mann KA, Miller MA, Pray CL, Verdonschot N, Janssen D. A new approach to quantify trabecular resorption adjacent to cemented knee arthroplasty. J Biomech. 2012;45:711–715.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller MA, Eberhardt A, Cleary RJ, Verdonschot N, Mann KA. Micro-mechanics of post-mortem retrieved cement-bone interfaces. J Orthop Res. 2010;28:170–177.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Race A, Miller MA, Clarke MT, Mann KA, Higham PA. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:607–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement: the effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:60–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlegel UJ, Siewe J, Delank KS, Eysel P, Puschel K, Morlock MM, de Uhlenbrock AG. Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1165–1169.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M, Sedlacek RC, Haire TC, O’Connor DO, Bragdon CR, Kabo JM, Malcolm AJ, Harris WH. The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:60–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Walker PS, Soudry M, Ewald FC, McVickar H. Control of cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;185:155–164.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinstein AM, Rome BN, Reichmann WM, Collins JE, Burbine SA, Thornhill TS, Wright J, Katz JN, Losina E. Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:385–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Megan Oest PhD for assistance with specimen staining and Joseph Battaglia BS for assistance with specimen sectioning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth A. Mann PhD.

Additional information

The institution of one or more of the authors (MAM, JRG, KAM) has received, during the study period, funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH AR42017). One of the authors certifies that he (THI), or a member of his immediate family, has received or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, an amount of USD (USD 10,000 to USD 100,000), from Stryker Orthopaedics (Mahwah, NJ, USA).

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved or waived approval for the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

This work was performed at SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, M.A., Goodheart, J.R., Izant, T.H. et al. Loss of Cement-bone Interlock in Retrieved Tibial Components from Total Knee Arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 304–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3248-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3248-4

Keywords

Navigation