Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oxidized Zirconium versus Cobalt-Chromium in TKA: Profilometry of Retrieved Femoral Components

  • Symposium: 2013 Knee Society Proceedings
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Oxidized zirconium (OxZr) was introduced as an alternative bearing for femoral components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an attempt to reduce wear compared with conventional cobalt-chromium (CoCr) alloys.

Questions/purposes

The aim of this study was to compare matched pairs of retrieved OxZr and CoCr components using surface profilometry; specifically, we sought to compare the surface roughness of (1) retrieved OxZr TKA components with retrieved CoCr components; (2) the medial versus the lateral femoral condyles of retrieved components; and (3) unimplanted OxZr TKA components with unimplanted CoCr components.

Methods

Ten retrieved posterior-stabilized Genesis II TKA with OxZr femoral components were identified and matched to retrieved CoCr femoral components by duration of implantation, patient age, and body mass index. A noncontact white light interferometer was used to evaluate surface roughness. One pristine, unimplanted component of each design was analyzed as a control.

Results

The retrieved components showed significantly (p < 0.0001) lower roughness for the OxZr components than the CoCr components. CoCr retrievals showed a significantly greater average surface roughness on the medial condyle. No difference was found between the condyles of the OxZr components. The pristine CoCr implant had a significantly lower surface roughness than the pristine OxZr component.

Conclusions

CoCr roughens significantly more in situ compared with OxZr components.

Clinical Relevance

Bearing surfaces are typically damaged in vivo. The extent of damage is variable between patients and implants; however, rougher surfaces should be associated with more wear. Whether the differences observed in our study prove meaningful requires long-term clinical data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A–B
Fig. 4A–D
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Affatato S, Bersaglia G, Junqiang Y, Traina F, Toni A, Viceconti M. The predictive power of surface profile parameters on the amount of wear measure in vitro on metal-on-polyethylene artificial hip joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med. 2006;220:457–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blunt L, Jiang X. Numerical parameters for characterisation of topography. In: Blunt L, Jiang X, eds. Advanced Techniques for Assessment Surface Topography. Oxford, UK: Kogan Page Science; 2003:17–41. Available at: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781903996119500025. Accessed April 24, 2013.

  3. Crowninshield RD, Jennings JD, Laurent ML, Maloney WJ. Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:90–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson JA, Poggie RA, Mishra AK. Abrasive wear of ceramic, metal, and UHMWPE bearing surfaces from third-body bone, PMMA bone cement, and titanium debris. Biomed Mater Eng. 1994;4:213–229.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ezzet KA, Hermida JC, Colwell CW, D’Lima DD. Oxidized zirconium femoral components reduce polyethylene wear in a knee wear simulator. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:120–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ezzet KA, Hermida JC, Steklov N, D′Lima DD. Wear of polyethylene against oxidized zirconium femoral components: effect of aggressive kinematic conditions and malalignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:116–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher J, McEwen HMJ, Tipper JL, Galvin AL, Ingram J, Kamali A, Stone MH, Ingham E. Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:114–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Green TR, Fisher J, Stone M, Wroblewski BM, Ingham E. Polyethylene particles of a ‘critical size’ are necessary for the induction of cytokines by macrophages in vitro. Biomaterials. 1998;19:2297–2302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halder A, Kutzner I, Graichen F, Heinlein B, Beier A, Bergmann G. Influence of limb alignment on mediolateral loading in total knee replacement: in vivo measurements in five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1023–1029.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hardin J, Hilbe J. Generalized Estimating Equations. London, UK: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heyse T, Haas S, Efe T. The use of oxidized zirconium alloy in knee arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012;9:409–421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heyse TJ, Chen DX, Kelly N, Boettner F, Wright TM, Haas SB. Matched-pair total knee arthroplasty retrieval analysis: oxidized zirconium vs CoCrMo. Knee. 2011;18:448–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heyse TJ, Davis J, Haas SB, Chen DX, Wright TM, Laskin RS. Retrieval analysis of femoral zirconium components in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:445–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hui C. Five-year comparison of oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium femoral components in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:624.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter G, Jones J, Spector BM. Oxidized Zirconium. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang X, Scott PJ, Whitehouse DJ, Blunt L. Paradigm shifts in surface metrology. Part II. The current shift. Proc R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2007;463:2071–2099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim Y-H, Kim J-S, Huh W, Lee K-H. Weight of polyethylene wear particles is similar in TKAs with oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chrome prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;468:1296–1304.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. Comparison of the Genesis II total knee replacement with oxidised zirconium and cobalt-chromium femoral components in the same patients. A prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:1221–1227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lakdawala A, Todo S, Scott G. The significance of surface changes on retrieved femoral components after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:796–799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laskin RS. An oxidized Zr ceramic surfaced femoral component for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:191–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malikian R, Maruthainar K, Stammers J, Cannon SR, Carrington R, Skinner JA, Maruthainar N, Dowd G, Briggs TWR, Blunn GW. In vivo roughening of retrieved total knee arthroplasty femoral components. Knee. 2012. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0968016012001603. Accessed April 30, 2013.

  23. Puloski SK, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Surface analysis of posterior stabilized femoral components used in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:822–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Que L, Topoleski LDT. Surface roughness quantification of CoCrMo implant alloys. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;48:705–711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Que L, Topoleski LDT, Parks NL. Surface roughness of retrieved CoCrMo alloy femoral components from PCA artificial total knee joints. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:111–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spector BM, Ries MD, Bourne RB, Sauer WS, Long M, Hunter G. Wear performance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene on oxidized zirconium total knee femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(Suppl 2):80–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. White SE, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, Anthony M, Poggie RA. Simulated knee wear with cobalt chromium and oxidized zirconium knee femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;309:176–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wright TM, Goodman SB, eds. Implant Wear in Total Joint Replacement. Rosemont, IL, USA: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao D, Banks SA, Mitchell KH, D’Lima DD, Colwell CW, Fregly BJ. Correlation between the knee adduction torque and medial contact force for a variety of gait patterns. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:789–797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kara Fields and Dr Stephen Lyman for their statistical assistance. This work made use of the Cornell Center for Materials Research Shared Facilities, which are supported through the NSF MRSEC program (DMR-1120296).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy M. Wright PhD.

Additional information

This study was partially funded through a grant from the Marmor Fund of the Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement (ARJR) Service of the Hospital for Special Surgery (SBH). Other support was provided by the Clark and Kirby Foundations and The Trump Institute for Implant Analysis (TMW). One or more of the authors certifies that he (TJH) or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, an amount less than USD 10,000, from Smith & Nephew (Memphis, TN, USA). One or more of the authors certifies that he (SBH) or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, an amount more than USD 1,000,001, from Smith & Nephew. One or more of the authors certifies that he (TMW) or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, an amount less than USD 10,000, from Mathys Ltd Bettlach (Bettlach, Switzerland), and an amount USD 10,000–100,000, from Exactech Inc (Great Neck, NY, USA).

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

About this article

Cite this article

Heyse, T.J., Elpers, M.E., Nawabi, D.H. et al. Oxidized Zirconium versus Cobalt-Chromium in TKA: Profilometry of Retrieved Femoral Components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 277–283 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3078-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3078-4

Keywords

Navigation