Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is Further Treatment Necessary for Patellar Crepitus After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Patellar crepitus may occur with posterior-stabilized (PS) TKAs. Several studies have suggested numerous etiologies of patellar crepitus after PS-TKA with patellar resurfacing. However, it is unclear whether and to what degree crepitus influences pain and function without or with patellar resurfacing.

Questions/purposes

We therefore determined (1) the frequency of crepitus; (2) which factors predicted the occurrence of crepitus; and (3) whether crepitus influenced pain and function.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients (54 knees) with painful or painless patellar crepitus after primary PS-TKAs without patellar resurfacing performed from 2007 to 2008. These patients were compared with a group of 73 patients (94 knees) without patellar crepitus matched for age, sex, and BMI. The minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 2.8 years; range, 2–4.5 years).

Results

Five (9%) of the 54 knees with patellar crepitus also had peripatellar pain. Mean time from primary TKA to the onset of patellar crepitus was 4 months. All patients in the patellar crepitus group were asymptomatic within 1 year of onset of symptoms without additional surgical treatment. The development of patellar crepitus was associated with an Outerbridge patellar cartilage Grade 4 (odds ratio [OR], 11.9; 95% CI, 2.2–65.3) and joint line elevation (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.9–8.6).

Conclusions

Patellar crepitus is typically benign and self-limited. We continue not to resurface arthritic patellae and counsel patients with patellar crepitus that their symptoms will improve without intervention.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson MJ, Becker DL, Kieckbusch T. Patellofemoral complications after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 2 different implant designs. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:422–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Badalamente MA, Cherney SB. Periosteal and vascular innervation of the human patella in degenerative joint disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1989;18(4 suppl 2):61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1376–1381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beight JA, Yao B, Hozack WJ, Hearn SL, Booth RE Jr. The patellar “clunk” syndrome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:139–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:50–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnett RS, Boone JL, Rosenzweig SD, Steger-May K, Barrack RL. Patellar resurfacing compared with nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a concise follow-up of a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2562–2567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years’ followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:12–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scuderi GR, Mills EL, Scott WN, Insall JN. The influence of femoral component design in the elimination of patellar clunk in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:167–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1713–1720.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dennis DA, Kim RH, Johnson DR, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Sharma A. The John Insall Award: control-matched evaluation of painful patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:10–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Diduch DR, Scuderi GR, Scott WN, Insall JN, Kelly MA. The efficacy of arthroscopy following total knee replacement. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:166–171.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM. Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:226–228.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Figgie HE 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS 3rd, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1035–1040.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukunaga K, Kobayashi A, Minoda Y, Iwaki H, Hashimoto Y, Takaoka K. The incidence of the patellar clunk syndrome in a recently designed mobile-bearing posteriorly stabilised total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:463–468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomes LS, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB. Patellar prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty: a roentgenographic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:72–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodfellow J, Hungerford DS, Zindel M. Patello-femoral joint mechanics and pathology: 1. functional anatomy of the patello-femoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58:287–290.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grelsamer RP, Meadows S. The modified Insall-Salvati ratio for assessment of patellar height. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;282:170–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Booth RE Jr, Balderston RA. The patellar clunk syndrome: a complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:203–208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ip D, Ko PS, Lee OB, Wu WC, Lam JJ. Natural history and pathogenesis of the patella clunk syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:597–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Keblish PA, Varma AK, Greenwald AS. Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:930–937.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Bezwada HP, Nazarian DG, Booth RE Jr. Incidence of patellar clunk with a modern posterior-stabilized knee design. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ). 2007;36:550–553.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lucas TS, DeLuca PF, Nazarian DG, Bartolozzi AR, Booth RE Jr. Arthroscopic treatment of patellar clunk. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:226–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maloney WJ, Schmidt R, Sculco TP. Femoral component design and patellar clunk syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:199–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:752–757.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pollock DC, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. Synovial entrapment: a complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:2174–2178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS, Slamin JE, Dennis DA. Patellar crepitation in the P.F.C. Sigma total knee system. Orthopedics. 2006;29(9 suppl):S68–S70.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ranawat CS, Luessenhop CP, Rodriguez JA. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system: four-to-six-year results with a posterior-cruciate-substituting design. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:342–348.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr A. Association of increased knee flexion and patella clunk syndrome after mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:281–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Siddiqui O, Ali MW. A comparison of the random-effects pattern mixture model with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) analysis in longitudinal clinical trials with dropouts. J Biopharm Stat. 1998;8:545–563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Takahashi M, Miyamoto S, Nagano A. Arthroscopic treatment of soft-tissue impingement under the patella after total knee arthroplasty. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:E20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wong JW, Yau PW, Chiu PK. Arthroscopic treatment of patellar symptoms in posterior stabilized total knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2002;26:250–252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yau WP, Wong JW, Chiu KY, Ng TP, Tang WM. Patellar clunk syndrome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:1023–1028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Hye-Sun Ahn MS and Ji-Won Park RS for help in collecting and organizing the data analyzed in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Su-Chan Lee MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.”

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at Himchan Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, BH., Nam, CH., Jung, KA. et al. Is Further Treatment Necessary for Patellar Crepitus After Total Knee Arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 606–612 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2634-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2634-7

Keywords

Navigation