Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Manipulation After TKA

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Knee stiffness or limited range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may compromise patient function. Patients with stiffness are usually managed with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) to improve ROM. However, the final ROM obtained is multifactorial and may depend on factors such as comorbidities, implant type, or the timing of MUA.

Questions/purposes

We asked whether diabetes mellitus, implant type, and the interval between TKA and MUA influenced post-MUA ROM.

Methods

From a group of 2462 patients with 3224 TKAs performed between 1999 and 2007 we retrospectively reviewed 96 patients with 119 TKAs (4.3%) who underwent MUA. We determined the presence of diabetes mellitus, implant type, and the interval between TKA and MUA.

Results

The average increase in ROM after MUA was 34°. Patients with diabetes mellitus experienced lower final ROM after MUA (87.5° versus 100.3°) as did patients with cruciate-retaining (CR) prostheses versus posterior-stabilized (92.3° versus 101.6°). The interval between TKA and MUA inversely correlated with final ROM with a decrease after 75 days.

Conclusions

Most patients experience improvements in ROM after MUA. Patients with diabetes mellitus or CR prostheses are at risk for lower final ROM after MUA. Manipulation within 75 days of TKA is associated with better ROM.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babis GC, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Morrey BF. Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1534–1536.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolognesi MP, Marchant MH Jr, Viens NA, Cook C, Pietrobon R, Vail TP. The impact of diabetes on perioperative patient outcomes after total hip and total knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:92–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bong MR, Di Cesare PE. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12:164–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brosseau L, Balmer S, Tousignant M, O’Sullivan JP, Goudreault C, Goudreault M, Gringras S. Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:396–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhary R, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2579–2586.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen CP, Crawford JJ, Olin MD, Vail TP. Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:409–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coutts RD, Engh GA, Mayor MB, Whiteside LA, Wilde AH. The painful total knee replacement and the influence of component design. Contemp Orthop. 1994;28:523–536, 541–545.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daluga D, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK. Knee manipulation following total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of prognostic variables. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:119–128.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Esler CN, Lock K, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Manipulation of total knee replacements. Is the flexion gained retained? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:27–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox JL, Poss R. The role of manipulation following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:357–362.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gadinsky NE, Ehrhardt JK, Urband C, Westrich GH. Effect of body mass index on range of motion and manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1194–1197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawamura H, Bourne RB. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:248–252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Keating EM, Ritter MA, Harty LD, Haas G, Meding JB, Faris PM, Berend ME. Manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:282–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kettelkamp DB. Gait characteristics of the knee: normal, abnormal, and postreconstruction. Americam Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: Symposium on Reconstructive Surgery of the Knee. 1976:47–57.

  15. Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1479–1484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lau SKK, Chiu KY. Use of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:336–339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laubenthal KN, Smidt GL, Kettelkamp DB. A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther. 1972;52:34–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lavernia C, D’Apuzzo M, Rossi MD, Lee D. Accuracy of knee range of motion assessment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lenssen AF, van Dam EM, Crijns YH, Verhey M, Geesink RJ, van den Brandt PA, de Bie RA. Reproducibility of goniometric measurement of the knee in the in-hospital phase following total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maloney WJ. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:71–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Namba RS, Inacio M. Early and late manipulation improve flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:58–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Namba RS, Paxton L, Fithian DC, Stone ML. Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:46–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nelson CL, Kim J, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(Suppl 1):264–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Papagelopoulos PJ, Sim FH. Limited range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: etiology, treatment, and prognosis. Orthopedics. 1997;20:1061–1065; quiz 1066–1067.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pariente GM, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Adams JB. Manipulation with prolonged epidural analgesia for treatment of TKA complicated by arthrofibrosis. Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:221–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pope RO, Corcoran S, McCaul K, Howie DW. Continuous passive motion after primary total knee arthroplasty—does it offer any benefits? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:914–917.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ritter MA, Campbell ED. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:95–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ritter MA, Stringer EA. Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;143:115–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schiavone Panni A, Cerciello S, Vasso M, Tartarone M. Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009;10: 111–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schurman DJ, Parker JN, Ornstein D. Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1006–1014.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Scranton PE Jr. Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:428–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Scuderi GR. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causality and solution. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:23–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shoji H, Solomonow M, Yoshino S, D’Ambrosia R, Dabezies E. Factors affecting postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1990;13:643–649.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Watkins MA, Riddle DL, Lamb RL, Personius WJ. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Phys Ther. 1991;71:90–96; discussion 96–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yercan HS, Sugun TS, Bussiere C, Ait Si Selmi T, Davies A, Neyret P. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes. Knee. 2006;13:111–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank William Petersilge, MD, for contributing patients to the study and Patricia Conroy-Smith for help with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harpreet S. Bawa MD.

Additional information

One of the authors (VMG) certifies that he has received payments or benefits, in any one year, an amount in excess of $1,000,000 from Zimmer (Warsaw, IN, USA) related to this work.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Bawa, H.S., Wera, G.D., Kraay, M.J. et al. Predictors of Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Manipulation After TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 258–263 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2591-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2591-1

Keywords

Navigation