Abstract
Background
Knee stiffness or limited range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may compromise patient function. Patients with stiffness are usually managed with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) to improve ROM. However, the final ROM obtained is multifactorial and may depend on factors such as comorbidities, implant type, or the timing of MUA.
Questions/purposes
We asked whether diabetes mellitus, implant type, and the interval between TKA and MUA influenced post-MUA ROM.
Methods
From a group of 2462 patients with 3224 TKAs performed between 1999 and 2007 we retrospectively reviewed 96 patients with 119 TKAs (4.3%) who underwent MUA. We determined the presence of diabetes mellitus, implant type, and the interval between TKA and MUA.
Results
The average increase in ROM after MUA was 34°. Patients with diabetes mellitus experienced lower final ROM after MUA (87.5° versus 100.3°) as did patients with cruciate-retaining (CR) prostheses versus posterior-stabilized (92.3° versus 101.6°). The interval between TKA and MUA inversely correlated with final ROM with a decrease after 75 days.
Conclusions
Most patients experience improvements in ROM after MUA. Patients with diabetes mellitus or CR prostheses are at risk for lower final ROM after MUA. Manipulation within 75 days of TKA is associated with better ROM.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babis GC, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Morrey BF. Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1534–1536.
Bolognesi MP, Marchant MH Jr, Viens NA, Cook C, Pietrobon R, Vail TP. The impact of diabetes on perioperative patient outcomes after total hip and total knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:92–98.
Bong MR, Di Cesare PE. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12:164–171.
Brosseau L, Balmer S, Tousignant M, O’Sullivan JP, Goudreault C, Goudreault M, Gringras S. Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:396–402.
Chaudhary R, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2579–2586.
Christensen CP, Crawford JJ, Olin MD, Vail TP. Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:409–415.
Coutts RD, Engh GA, Mayor MB, Whiteside LA, Wilde AH. The painful total knee replacement and the influence of component design. Contemp Orthop. 1994;28:523–536, 541–545.
Daluga D, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK. Knee manipulation following total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of prognostic variables. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:119–128.
Esler CN, Lock K, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Manipulation of total knee replacements. Is the flexion gained retained? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:27–29.
Fox JL, Poss R. The role of manipulation following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:357–362.
Gadinsky NE, Ehrhardt JK, Urband C, Westrich GH. Effect of body mass index on range of motion and manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1194–1197.
Kawamura H, Bourne RB. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:248–252.
Keating EM, Ritter MA, Harty LD, Haas G, Meding JB, Faris PM, Berend ME. Manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:282–286.
Kettelkamp DB. Gait characteristics of the knee: normal, abnormal, and postreconstruction. Americam Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: Symposium on Reconstructive Surgery of the Knee. 1976:47–57.
Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1479–1484.
Lau SKK, Chiu KY. Use of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:336–339.
Laubenthal KN, Smidt GL, Kettelkamp DB. A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther. 1972;52:34–43.
Lavernia C, D’Apuzzo M, Rossi MD, Lee D. Accuracy of knee range of motion assessment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:85–91.
Lenssen AF, van Dam EM, Crijns YH, Verhey M, Geesink RJ, van den Brandt PA, de Bie RA. Reproducibility of goniometric measurement of the knee in the in-hospital phase following total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:83.
Maloney WJ. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:71–73.
Namba RS, Inacio M. Early and late manipulation improve flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:58–61.
Namba RS, Paxton L, Fithian DC, Stone ML. Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:46–50.
Nelson CL, Kim J, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(Suppl 1):264–270.
Papagelopoulos PJ, Sim FH. Limited range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: etiology, treatment, and prognosis. Orthopedics. 1997;20:1061–1065; quiz 1066–1067.
Pariente GM, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Adams JB. Manipulation with prolonged epidural analgesia for treatment of TKA complicated by arthrofibrosis. Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:221–224.
Pope RO, Corcoran S, McCaul K, Howie DW. Continuous passive motion after primary total knee arthroplasty—does it offer any benefits? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:914–917.
Ritter MA, Campbell ED. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:95–97.
Ritter MA, Stringer EA. Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;143:115–119.
Schiavone Panni A, Cerciello S, Vasso M, Tartarone M. Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009;10: 111–118.
Schurman DJ, Parker JN, Ornstein D. Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1006–1014.
Scranton PE Jr. Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:428–435.
Scuderi GR. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causality and solution. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:23–26.
Shoji H, Solomonow M, Yoshino S, D’Ambrosia R, Dabezies E. Factors affecting postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1990;13:643–649.
Watkins MA, Riddle DL, Lamb RL, Personius WJ. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Phys Ther. 1991;71:90–96; discussion 96–97.
Yercan HS, Sugun TS, Bussiere C, Ait Si Selmi T, Davies A, Neyret P. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes. Knee. 2006;13:111–117.
Acknowledgments
We thank William Petersilge, MD, for contributing patients to the study and Patricia Conroy-Smith for help with data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
One of the authors (VMG) certifies that he has received payments or benefits, in any one year, an amount in excess of $1,000,000 from Zimmer (Warsaw, IN, USA) related to this work.
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
About this article
Cite this article
Bawa, H.S., Wera, G.D., Kraay, M.J. et al. Predictors of Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Manipulation After TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 258–263 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2591-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2591-1