Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary Pain and Function After Labral Reconstruction During Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery

  • Symposium: ABJS Carl T. Brighton Workshop on Hip Preservation Surgery
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Labral refixation rather than resection provides better pain relief and function after femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery. When the labrum is absent, degenerated, or is irreparable, reconstruction may provide a favorable biomechanical environment for the hip. However, it is unclear whether labral reconstruction relieves pain and restores function.

Question/Purposes

In patients undergoing FAI surgery with concomitant labral reconstruction, (1) Do they note subjective improvement in pain at latest followup? (2) What is their postoperative activity level? (3) What are the complications, reoperation rates, and reasons for failure?

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all 19 patients who underwent labral reconstruction in 20 hips at the time of surgical hip dislocation between August 2007 and February 2011. We assessed improvement in pain and function, complications, and subsequent surgery through a chart review and questionnaire. The minimum followup was 12 months (average, 26.4 months; range, 12–56 months).

Results

Three hips in three patients were converted to THA within 36 months of their surgical hip dislocation for continued preoperative pain. Of the 17 hips not undergoing THA, 15 reported subjective improvement in preoperative pain and function. The average UCLA score was 8.5 (range, 5–10). We observed no complications associated with the labral reconstruction itself.

Conclusion

The majority of patients with reconstructed acetabular labra reported improvement in their hip pain and function after surgery. The causes of persistent symptoms and conversion to THA remain uncertain. The data and conclusions of this study are limited secondary to lack of objective outcome measures.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1012–1018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clohisy JC, St John LC, Schutz AL. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:555–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crawford MJ, Dy CJ, Alexander JW, Thompson M, Schroder SJ, Vega CE, Patel RV, Miller AR, McCarthy JC, Lowe WR, Noble PC. The 2007 Frank Stinchfield Award. The biomechanics of the hip labrum and the stability of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:16–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Espinosa N, Beck M, Rothenfluh DA, Ganz R, Leunig M. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 2):36–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R, Ito K. An in vitro investigation of the acetabular labral seal in hip joint mechanics. J Biomech. 2003;36:171–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ito K. The material properties of the bovine acetabular labrum. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:887–896.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujii M, Nakashima Y, Noguchi Y, Yamamoto T, Mawatari T, Motomura G, Iwamoto Y. Effect of intra-articular lesions on the outcome of periacetabular osteotomy in patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1449–1456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1119–1124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito K, Leunig M, Ganz R. Histopathologic features of the acetabular labrum in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:262–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krueger A, Leunig M, Sibenrock KA, Beck M. Hip arthroscopy after previous surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1285–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Larson CM, Giveans MR. Arthroscopic débridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:369–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Larson CM, Giveans MR, Stone RM. Arthroscopic débridement versus refixation of hte acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement: mean 3.5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1015–1021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R, Leunig M. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:61–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43B:752–757.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, yen TM, Kuppersmith DA. Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction; minimum two year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:16–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schilders E, Dimitrakopoulou A, Bismil Q, Marchant P, Cooke C. Arthroscopic treatment of labral tears in femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative study of refixation and resection with a minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1027–1032.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT. Labral reconstruction using the ligamentum teres capitis: report of a new technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:753–759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sink EL, Beaule PE, Sucato D, Kim YJ, Millis MB, Dayton M, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Zaltz I, Schoenecker P, Monreal A, Clohisy J. Multicenter study of complications following surgical dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1132–1136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Gregory Boone of Mayo Medical School for his help with this article and Donna Riemersma in the Orthopedic Department Manuscript Office for her help in the submission of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael J. Sierra MD.

Additional information

One or more of the authors receives funding from Biomet Orthopedics (Warsaw, IN, USA) (RJS) and DePuy Orthopaedics (Warsaw, IN, USA), Wright Medical (Arlington, TN, USA), Mako Surgical (Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA), and Ortho Development Corp. (Draper, UT, USA) (RTT).

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

Appendix A. Study questions

Appendix A. Study questions

You recently underwent an open surgical hip dislocation with reconstruction of your acetabular labrum with either ligamentum teres capitus or fascia lata autograft.

  1. 1.

    Do you currently have pain in your operative hip?

    If NO: Skip to Question #6

    If YES: Continue to Question #2?

  2. 2.

    How often do you have pain in the operative hip? (constant, daily, occasionally, with activity, rarely)

  3. 3.

    How would you describe your pain? (deep, shallow, dull, sharp, electric, burning)

  4. 4.

    How severe is your pain (mild, moderate, severe)?

  5. 5.

    Would you say your pain is more frequently deep, in your groin, or on the side of your hip?

  6. 6.

    How is your hip compared with before surgery? (much better, better, the same, worse, much worse)

  7. 7.

    If you could make the decision again–given how you feel now, and what you know about the recovery from surgery—would you decide to undergo the procedure again?

  8. 8.

    Now, I will ask you about your current activity level. I will read several choices that may describe your current activity level; please tell me which one best describes your current activity level. (See attached UCLA activity score.)

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, J.A., Pagnotto, M., Trousdale, R.T. et al. Preliminary Pain and Function After Labral Reconstruction During Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 3414–3420 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2506-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2506-1

Keywords

Navigation