Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical Technique: Unicondylar Osteoallograft Prosthesis Composite in Tumor Limb Salvage Surgery

  • Surgical Technique
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

After resecting tumors confined to one femoral condyle, a unicondylar osteoarticular allograft can be used for reconstruction without sacrificing the uninvolved condyle. However, unicondylar osteoarticular allografts have been associated with a high rate of joint degeneration. We describe a unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite reconstruction replacing only one side of the joint to reduce compartment degeneration and avoid contamination of the tibia, but the survival, function, and complications of a unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite are unclear.

Description of Technique

We located a bone resection plane intraoperatively as planned before surgery using a computer-assisted navigation system. The tumor then was removed en bloc and the unicondylar defect filled with a size-matched allogeneic unicondyle. The allograft cartilage was removed. Thereafter, the condyle of the femoral component was resurfaced with a unicompartmental knee prosthesis to form a unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite, however the tibia was left undisturbed. Navigation allowed precise apposition between the unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite and host bone to ensure mechanical alignment and congruency of the joint surface before fixation with a plate.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients who underwent unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite reconstructions after unicondylar resection for tumors. One patient died from tumor-related causes without unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite failure after 18 months. We observed the survival rate of unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite reconstruction and related complications. Function and radiographs also were documented according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional scoring system and the International Society of Limb Salvage radiographic scoring system. The minimum followup was 8 months (median, 37 months; range, 8–65 months).

Results

At last followup, 10 of the 12 unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite reconstructions were still in place. Three reconstructions failed owing to two local recurrences (both treated with amputation) and there was one infection (treated with revision and maintenance of the implant at last followup). The average MSTS functional score at last followup was 27 points and the radiographic score 91%.

Conclusions

Our observations suggest unicondylar osteoallograft prosthesis composite reconstruction might be a reliable technique with relatively few major complications and at least short-term maintenance of the tibial cartilage.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–D
Fig. 2A–D
Fig. 3A–D
Fig. 4A–C
Fig. 5A–F

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aubin PP, Cheah HK, Davis AM, Gross AE. Long-term followup of fresh femoral osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 391(suppl):S318–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bianchi G, Staals EL, Donati D, Mercuri M. The use of unicondylar osteoarticular allografts in reconstructions around the knee. Knee. 2009;16:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Biau D, Faure F, Katsahian S, Jeanrot C, Tomeno B, Anract P. Survival of total knee replacement with a megaprosthesis after bone tumor resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1285–1293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bickels J, Wittig JC, Kollender Y, Henshaw RM, Kellar-Graney KL, Meller I, Malawer MM. Distal femur resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction: a long-term followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;400:225–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campanacci M, Baldini N, Boriani S, Sudanese A. Giant-cell tumor of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69:106–114.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Campanacci M, Cervellati C, Donati U. Autogenous patella as replacement for a resected femoral or tibial condyle: a report on 19 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:557–563.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cartiaux O, Docquier PL, Paul L, Francq BG, Cornu OH, Delloye C, Raucent B, Dehez B, Banse X. Surgical inaccuracy of tumor resection and reconstruction within the pelvis: an experimental study. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:695–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farooque M, Sharma RK. Patellar reconstruction of the condyles in giant cell tumours of the knee. Int Orthop. 1995;19:355–358.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerrand CH, Currie D, Grigoris P, Reid R, Hamblen DL. Prosthetic reconstruction of the femur for primary bone sarcoma. Int Orthop. 1999;23:286–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Glasser D, Langlais F. The ISOLS radiological implant evaluation system. In: Langlais F, Tomeno B, eds. Limb Salvage: Major Reconstructions in Oncologic and Nontumoral Conditions. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1991:23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gross AE, Kim W, Las Heras F, Backstein D, Safir O, Pritzker KP. Fresh osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects: long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1863–1870.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Henderson ER, Groundland JS, Pala E, Dennis JA, Wooten R, Cheong D, Windhager R, Kotz RI, Mercuri M, Funovics PT, Hornicek FJ, Temple HT, Ruggieri P, Letson GD. Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:418–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawai A, Muschler GF, Lane JM, Otis JC, Healey JH. Prosthetic knee replacement after resection of a malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur: medium to long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:636–647.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li D, Bi L, Meng G, Wang J, Lv R, Liu M, Liu J, Hu Y. Mineral status and mechanical properties of cancellous bone exposed to hydrogen peroxide for various time periods. Cell Tissue Bank. 2011;12:51–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li D, Bi L, Meng GL, Liu M, Jin J, Liu Y, Wang Z, Liu J, Hu YY. Multi-variety bone bank in China. Cell Tissue Bank. 2010;11:233–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA, Abalo E, Farfalli G. Unicondylar osteoarticular allografts of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2137–2142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA, Abalo E, Farfalli G. Unicondylar osteoarticular allografts of the knee: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90 (suppl 2):206–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA, Ranalletta M. Use of distal femoral osteoarticular allografts in limb salvage surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2449–2455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Farfalli G, Aponte-Tinao LA. Proximal tibia osteoarticular allografts in tumor limb salvage surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1396–1404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Power RA, Wood DJ, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Revision osteoarticular allograft transplantation in weight-bearing joints: a clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:595–599.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Terek RM, Hulstyn MJ. Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction for tumors of the distal femur and proximal tibia. Oper Tech Orthop. 2004;14:236–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Toy PC, White JR, Scarborough MT, Enneking WF, Gibbs CP. Distal femoral osteoarticular allografts: long-term survival, but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2914–2923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong KC, Kumta SM, Chiu KH, Antonio GE, Unwin P, Leung KS. Precision tumour resection and reconstruction using image-guided computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:943–947.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jun Fu MD for technical support in image integration for the computer-assisted navigation surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Guo MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

Each author certifies that his institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, H., Guo, Z., Wang, Z. et al. Surgical Technique: Unicondylar Osteoallograft Prosthesis Composite in Tumor Limb Salvage Surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 3577–3586 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2455-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2455-8

Keywords

Navigation