Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What Is the Infection Rate of the Posterior Approach to Type C Pelvic Injuries?

  • Symposium: Disruptions of the Pelvic Ring: An Update
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Pelvic ring injuries with complete disruption of the posterior pelvis (AO/OTA Type C) benefit from reduction and stabilization. Open reduction in early reports had high infectious complications and many surgeons began using closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. Multiple smaller studies have reported low infection rates after a posterior approach, but these rates are not confirmed in larger series of diverse fractures.

Questions/Purposes

We therefore determined (1) the incidence of surgical site infectious complications after a posterior approach to the pelvis; and (2) whether secondary procedures other than surgical débridement are necessary as a result of the approach-related complications.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all 236 patients (268 surgical approaches) with C type injuries treated with a posterior approach at six institutions before 1998 and at one institution from 1998 to 2005. Posterior injuries were classified anatomically as described by Letournel and the AO/OTA system. We recorded wound complications after surgery.

Results

Surgical site infection occurred in eight of the 236 patients (3.4%) in the multicenter analysis. Treatment consisted of surgical débridement, wound closure, and antibiotics. No patients required soft tissue reconstruction as a result of the approach or infection.

Conclusion

Our data suggest with proper patient selection and the described surgical technique, there should be minimal risk for catastrophic wound complications or high infection rates as reported by others.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellabarba C, Schildhauer TA, Vaccaro AR, Chapman JR. Complications associated with surgical stabilization of high-grade sacral fracture dislocations with spino-pelvic instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:S80–88; discussion S104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borrelli J Jr, Koval KJ, Helfet DL. The crescent fracture: a posterior fracture dislocation of the sacroiliac joint. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:165–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Browner BD, Cole JD, Graham JM, Bondurant FJ, Nunchuck-Burns SK, Colter HB. Delayed posterior internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 1987;27:998–1006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bucholz RW. The pathological anatomy of Malgaigne fracture-dislocations of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:400–404.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dalal SA, Burgess AR, Siegel JH, Young JW, Brumback RJ, Poka A, Dunham CM, Gens D, Bathon H. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1989;29:981–1000; discussion 1000–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickson KF, Matta JM. Skeletal deformity after anterior external fixation of the pelvis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:327–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dujardin FH, Hossenbaccus M, Duparc F, Biga N, Thomine JM. Long-term functional prognosis of posterior injuries in high-energy pelvic disruption. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:145–150; discussion 150–151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunn AW, Morris HD. Fractures and dislocations of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968;50:1639–1648.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(Suppl 1):v–ix.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gansslen A, Pohlemann T, Paul C, Lobenhoffer P, Tscherne H. Epidemiology of pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 1996;27(Suppl 1):S-A13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstein A, Phillips T, Sclafani SJ, Scalea T, Duncan A, Goldstein J, Panetta T, Shaftan G. Early open reduction and internal fixation of the disrupted pelvic ring. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1986;26:325–333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffin DR, Starr AJ, Reinert CM, Jones AL, Whitlock S. Vertically unstable pelvic fractures fixed with percutaneous iliosacral screws: does posterior injury pattern predict fixation failure? J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:399–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gruen GS, Leit ME, Gruen RJ, Garrison HG, Auble TE, Peitzman AB. Functional outcome of patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures stabilized with open reduction and internal fixation. J Trauma. 1995;39:838–844; discussion 844–845.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hak DJ, Olson SA, Matta JM. Diagnosis and management of closed internal degloving injuries associated with pelvic and acetabular fractures: the Morel-Lavallee lesion. J Trauma. 1997;42:1046–1051.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Henderson RC. The long-term results of nonoperatively treated major pelvic disruptions. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3:41–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Holdsworth FW. Dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948;30:461–466.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control. 1992;20:271–274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huittinen VM, Slatis P. Fractures of the pelvis. Trauma mechanism, types of injury and principles of treatment. Acta Chir Scand. 1972;138:563–569.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Keating JF, Werier J, Blachut P, Broekhuyse H, Meek RN, O’Brien PJ. Early fixation of the vertically unstable pelvis: the role of iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior lesion. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:107–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kellam JF. The role of external fixation in pelvic disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:66–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kellam JF, McMurtry RY, Paley D, Tile M. The unstable pelvic fracture. Operative treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987;18:25–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Letournel E. Pelvic fractures. Injury. 1978;10:145–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Letournel É, Judet R, Elson R. Fractures of the Acetabulum. Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag; 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Outcome of operatively treated type-C injuries of the pelvic ring. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:667–678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Bostman O, Santavirta S. Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:955–962.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Matta JM. Surgical Approaches to Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis. Malibu, CA, USA: Joel M. Matta, MD Inc; 1989.

  28. Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1632–1645.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Matta JM, Saucedo T. Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;242:83–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Matta JM, Tornetta P 3rd. Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:129–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Miranda MA, Riemer BL, Butterfield SL, Burke CJ 3rd. Pelvic ring injuries. A long term functional outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:152–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moed BR, Karges DE. Techniques for reduction and fixation of pelvic ring disruptions through the posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:102–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moon CN, Merkle PF. A level one trauma center’s experience with the posterior approach to the pelvis. Orthopedics. 2002;25:159–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pohlemann T, Tscherne H, Baumgartel F, Egbers HJ, Euler E, Maurer F, Fell M, Mayr E, Quirini WW, Schlickewei W, Weinberg A. [Pelvic fractures: epidemiology, therapy and long-term outcome. Overview of the multicenter study of the Pelvis Study Group] [in German]. Unfallchirurg. 1996;99:160–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Raf L. Double vertical fractures of the pelvis. Acta Chir Scand. 1966;131:298–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Routt ML Jr, Kregor PJ, Simonian PT, Mayo KA. Early results of percutaneous iliosacral screws placed with the patient in the supine position. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9:207–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Mills WJ. Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:584–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sagi HC, Militano U, Caron T, Lindvall E. A comprehensive analysis with minimum 1-year follow-up of vertically unstable transforaminal sacral fractures treated with triangular osteosynthesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:313–319; discussion 319–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Suzuki T, Hak DJ, Ziran BH, Adams SA, Stahel PF, Morgan SJ, Smith WR. Outcome and complications of posterior transiliac plating for vertically unstable sacral fractures. Injury. 2009;40:405–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Templeman D, Goulet J, Duwelius PJ, Olson S, Davidson M. Internal fixation of displaced fractures of the sacrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:180–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tile M. Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:1–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tornetta P 3rd, Matta JM. Outcome of operatively treated unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:186–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tseng S, Tornetta P 3rd. Percutaneous management of Morel-Lavallee lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:92–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. van den Bosch EW, van Zwienen CM, van Vugt AB. Fluoroscopic positioning of sacroiliac screws in 88 patients. J Trauma. 2002;53:44–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ward EF, Tomasin J, Vander Griend RA. Open reduction and internal fixation of vertical shear pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 1987;27:291–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wild JJ Jr, Hanson GW, Tullos HS. Unstable fractures of the pelvis treated by external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1010–1020.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the contributions of Paul Merkle MD, Steve Olson MD, Keith Mayo MD, and David Templeman for compiling and contributing data and making this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Stover MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.

About this article

Cite this article

Stover, M.D., Sims, S. & Matta, J. What Is the Infection Rate of the Posterior Approach to Type C Pelvic Injuries?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 2142–2147 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2438-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2438-9

Keywords

Navigation