Abstract
Background
The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred pelvic osteotomy in many centers treating symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in the young adult. Major nerve injury has been reported as a complication that can occur with this complex procedure, but the incidence and circumstances associated with such injury are not well known.
Questions/Purposes
We asked: (1) What is the incidence of sciatic and femoral nerve injury after PAO; (2) what are the risk factors associated with such injury; and (3) what are the consequences of such injury including the degree of neurologic recovery?
Patients and Methods
We identified 1760 PAOs that were performed between 1991 and 2008 at five institutions. A major nerve injury was defined as a postoperative motor nerve palsy or sensory deficit present after surgery in the distribution of the femoral or sciatic nerves. Risk factors associated with nerve injury and the treatment and degree of neurologic recovery were reviewed from medical records.
Results
Thirty-six of the 1760 patients (2.1%) had a major nerve deficit of the sciatic or femoral nerve develop. We identified no patient or surgical risk factor associated with the occurrence of nerve injury. Seventeen of the 36 patients had complete recovery. The median time to recovery or plateau was 5.5 months (range, 2 days to 24 months).
Conclusions
The incidence of sciatic and femoral nerve injury during PAO is less than previously reported. Full recovery can be expected in only ½ of the patients and more commonly with injuries of the femoral nerve. If direct nerve injury is suspected, we believe exploration may be warranted.
Level of Evidence
Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biedermann R, Donnan L, Gabriel A, Wachter R, Krismer M, Behensky H. Complications and patient satisfaction after periacetabular pelvic osteotomy. Int Orthop. 2008;32:611–617.
Clohisy JC, Barrett SE, Gordon JE, Delgado ED, Schoenecker PL. Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment for severe acetabular dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:254–259.
Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Curry MC, Schoenecker PL. Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia associated with major aspherical femoral head deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1417–1423.
Clohisy JC, Schutz AL, St John L, Schoenecker PL, Wright RW. Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2041–2052.
Crockarell J Jr, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Berry DJ. Early experience and results with the periacetabular osteotomy: the Mayo Clinic experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:45–53.
Davey JP, Santore RF. Complications of periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:33–37.
Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias: technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:26–36.
Hussel JG, Rodriguez JA, Ganz R. Technical complications of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:81–92.
Ko JY, Wang CJ, Lin CF, Shih CH. Periacetabular osteotomy through a modified Ollier transtrochanteric approach for treatment of painful dysplastic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1594–1604.
Kralj M, Mavcic B, Antolic V, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V. The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: clinical, radiographic and mechanical 7–15 year follow-up of 26 hips. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:833–840.
Matheney T, Kim YJ, Zurakowski D, Matero C, Millis M. Intermediate to long-term results following the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of clinical outcome: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(suppl 1 pt 2):115–129.
Matta JM, Stover MD, Siebenrock K. Periacetabular osteotomy through the Smith-Petersen approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:21–32.
Medical Research Council. Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System, Memorandum No. 34. London, England: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1981.
Millis MB, Kain M, Sierra, Trousdale R, Taunton MJ, Kim YJ, Rosenfeld SB, Kamath G, Schoenecker P, Clohisy JC. Periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia in patients older than 40 years: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2228–2234.
Naito M, Shiramizu K, Akiyoshi Y, Ezoe M, Nakamura Y. Curved periacetabular osteotomy for treatment of dysplastic hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:129–135.
Peters CL, Erickson JA, Hines J. Early results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: the learning curve at an academic medical center. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1920–1926.
Pring ME, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Harper CM. Intraoperative electromyographic monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;400:158–164.
Siebenrock KA, Scholl E, Lottenbach M, Ganz R. Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:9–20.
Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1633–1644.
Thawrani D, Sucato DJ, Podeszwa DA, DeLaRocha A. Complications associated with the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1707–1714.
Trousdale RT, Ekkernkamp A, Ganz R, Wallrichs SL. Periacetabular osteotomy and intertrochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthrosis in dysplastic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:73–85.
Trumble SJ, Mayo KA, Mast JW. The periacetabular osteotomy: minimum 2 year followup in more than 100 hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:54–63.
Acknowledgments
We thank Perry Schoenecker MD and Young Jo-Kim MD for contributing cases for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
In addition to the authors, Perry Schoenecker MD and Young Jo-Kim MD comprise the ANCHOR group.
One of the authors (RJS) certifies that he has or may receive payments or benefits, in any one year, an amount in excess of $10,000 from Biomet Inc (Warsaw, IN). One of the authors (JCC) certifies he has or may receive payments or benefits, in any one year, an amount of less than $10,000 from Biomet Inc. One of the authors (RTT) certifies he has or may receive payments or benefits, in any one year, an amount in excess of $100,000 from DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA, and less than $10,000 from MAKO Surgical Corp., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, and Wright Medical, Arlington, TN, USA.
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
This work was performed at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Appendix 1. Nerve Injury after PAO Data Collection Sheet
Appendix 1. Nerve Injury after PAO Data Collection Sheet
About this article
Cite this article
Sierra, R.J., Beaule, P., Zaltz, I. et al. Prevention of Nerve Injury After Periacetabular Osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 2209–2219 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2409-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2409-1