Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability and Relationship of Radiographic Measurements in Hallux Valgus

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Although various radiographic measurements have been developed and used for evaluating hallux valgus, not all are universally believed to be necessary and their relationships have not been clearly established. Determining which are related could provide some insight into which might be useful and which would not.

Questions/Purposes

We investigated the reliability of eight radiographic measurements used to evaluate hallux valgus, and determined which were correlated and which predicted the hallux valgus angle.

Methods

We determined eight radiographic indices for 732 patients (mean age, 51 years; SD, 17 years; 107 males and 625 females) with hallux valgus: hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, hallux interphalangeal angle, distal metatarsal articular angle, proximal phalangeal articular angle, simplified metatarsus adductus angle, first metatarsal protrusion distance, and sesamoid rotation angle. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of each radiographic measurement were analyzed on 36 feet from 36 randomly selected patients. Correlations among the radiographic measurements were analyzed. Radiographic measurements predicting hallux valgus angle were evaluated using multiple regression analysis.

Results

Hallux valgus angle had the highest reliability, whereas the distal metatarsal articular angle and simplified metatarsus adductus angle had the lowest. Distal metatarsal articular angle, intermetatarsal angle, and sesamoid rotation angle had the highest correlations with hallux valgus angle. Distal metatarsal articular angle correlated with sesamoid rotation angle. The intermetatarsal angle, interphalangeal angle, distal metatarsal articular angle, first metatarsal protrusion distance, sesamoid rotation angle, and metatarsus adductus angle predicted the hallux valgus angle.

Conclusions

We suggest using hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, interphalangeal angle, sesamoid rotation angle, and first metatarsal protrusion distance considering their reliability and prediction of the deformity.

Level of Evidence

Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balding MG, Sorto LA Jr. Distal articular set angle: etiology and x-ray evaluation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1985;75:648–652.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331–1335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryant A, Tinley P, Singer K. A comparison of radiographic measurements in normal, hallux valgus, and hallux limitus feet. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000;39:39–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 8th ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’Arcangelo PR, Landorf KB, Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Menz HB. Radiographic correlates of hallux valgus severity in older people. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Easley ME, Wiesel SW. Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engel E, Erlick N, Krems I. A simplified metatarsus adductus angle. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1983;73:620–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Farsetti P, Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV. The long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of untreated and non-operatively treated metatarsus adductus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:257–265.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hardy RH, Clapham JC. Observation on hallux valgus: base on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951;33:376–391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawkins FB, Mitchell CL, Hedrick DW. Correction of hallux valgus by metatarsal osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1945;27:387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jay RM. Pediatric Foot and Ankle Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Judge MS, LaPointe S, Yu GV, Shook JE, Taylor RP. The effect of hallux abducto valgus surgery on the sesamoid apparatus position. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999;89:551–559.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuwano T, Nagamine R, Sakaki K, Urabe K, Iwamoto Y. New radiographic analysis of sesamoid rotation in hallux valgus: comparison with conventional evaluation methods. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:811–817.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorimer DL, Neale D, French GJ. Neale’s Disorders of the Foot: Diagnosis and Management. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Menz HB, Munteanu SE. Radiographic validation of the Manchester scale for the classification of hallux valgus deformity. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:1061–1066.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen US, Hillstrom HJ, Li W, Dufour AB, Kiel DP, Procter-Gray E, Gagnon MM, Hannan MT. Factors associated with hallux valgus in a population-based study of older women and men: the MOBILIZE Boston Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:41–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okuda R, Kinoshita M, Yasuda T, Jotoku T, Kitano N, Shima H. Postoperative incomplete reduction of the sesamoids as a risk factor for recurrence of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1637–1645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park MS, Kim SJ, Chung CY, Choi IH, Lee SH, Lee KM. Statistical consideration for bilateral cases in orthopaedic research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1732–1737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piggott H. The natural history of hallux valgus in adolescence and early adult life. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1960;42:749–760.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saro C, Johnson DN, Martinez De Aragon J, Lindgren U, Fellander-Tsai L. Reliability of radiological and cosmetic measurements in hallux valgus. Acta Radiol. 2005;46:843–851.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shima H, Okuda R, Yasuda T, Jotoku T, Kitano N, Kinoshita M. Radiographic measurements in patients with hallux valgus before and after proximal crescentic osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1369–1376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sorto LA Jr, Balding MG, Weil LS, Smith SD. Hallux abductus interphalangeus: etiology, x-ray evaluation and treatment. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1976;66:384–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Srivastava S, Chockalingam N, El Fakhri T. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49:523–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yildirim Y, Cabukoglu C, Erol B, Esemenli T. Effect of metatarsophalangeal joint position on the reliability of the tangential sesamoid view in determining sesamoid position. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:247–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mi Sun Ryu BS, Jaebong Lee MS, Tae Won Kim MD, and Young Jin Park MD, for data management, statistical support, and advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moon Seok Park MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of their immediate family, has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation was waived by the ethical committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, K.M., Ahn, S., Chung, C.Y. et al. Reliability and Relationship of Radiographic Measurements in Hallux Valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 2613–2621 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2368-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2368-6

Keywords

Navigation