Skip to main content
Log in

Nonoperative versus Operative Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit: A Meta-analysis

  • Survey
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Decision-making regarding nonoperative versus operative treatment of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficits is controversial. Lack of evidence-based practice may result in patients being treated inappropriately and being exposed to unnecessary adverse consequences.

Purpose

Using meta-analysis, we therefore compared pain (VAS) and function (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit treated nonoperatively and operatively. Secondary outcomes included return to work, radiographic progression of kyphosis, radiographic progression of spinal canal stenosis, complications, cost, and length of hospitalization.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE®, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for ‘thoracic fractures’, ‘lumbar fractures’, ‘non-operative’, ‘operative’ and ‘controlled clinical trials’. We established five criteria for inclusion. Data extraction and quality assessment were in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The main analyses were performed on individual patient data from randomized controlled trials. Sensitivity analyses were performed on VAS pain, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score, kyphosis, and return to work, including data from nonrandomized controlled trials and using fixed effects meta-analysis. We identified four trials, including two randomized controlled trials consisting of 79 patients (41 with operative treatment and 38 with nonoperative treatment). The mean followups ranged from 24 to 118 months.

Results

We found no between-group differences in baseline pain, kyphosis, and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire scores. At last followup, there were no between-group differences in pain, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire scores, and return to work rates. We found an improvement in kyphosis ranging from means of 12.8º to 11º in the operative group, but surgery was associated with higher complication rates and costs.

Conclusions

Operative management of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit may improve residual kyphosis, but does not appear to improve pain or function at an average of 4 years after injury and is associated with higher complication rates and costs.

Level of Evidence

Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akbarnia BA, Crandall DG, Burkus K, Matthews T. Use of long rods and a short arthrodesis for burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1629–1635.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Yazici M, Oznur A, Surat A. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: does transpedicular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failure? Spine. 2001;26:213–217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aligizakis A, Katonis P, Stergiopoulos K, Galanakis I, Karabekios S, Hadjipavlou A. Functional outcome of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine managed non-operatively, with early ambulation, evaluated using the load sharing classification. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002;68:279–287.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aligizakis AC, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Papagelopoulos PJ, Galanakis I, Hadjipavlou A. Gertzbein and load sharing classifications for unstable thoracolumbar fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:77–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Andress HJ, Braun H, Helmberger T, Schurmann M, Hertlein H, Hartl WH. Long-term results after posterior fixation of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures. Injury. 2002;33:357–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Atlas SW, Regenbogen V, Rogers LF, Kim KS. The radiographic characterization of burst fractures of the spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol.1986;147:575–582.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bailey CS, Dvorak MF, Thomas KC, Boyd MC, Paquett S, Kwon BK, France J, Gurr KR, Bailey SI, Fisher CG. Comparison of thoracolumbosacral orthosis and no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: interim analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical equivalence trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11:295–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ballock RT, Mackersie R, Abitbol JJ, Cervilla V, Resnick D, Garfin SR. Can burst fractures be predicted from plain radiographs? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:147–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boerger TO, Limb D, Dickson RA. Does ‘canal clearance’ affect neurological outcome after thoracolumbar burst fractures? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:629–635.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Briem D, Lehmann W, Rueckner AH, Windolf J, Rueger JM, Linhart W. Factors influencing the quality of life after burst fractures of the thoracolumbar transition. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:461–468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Butler JS, Walsh A, O’Byrne JO. Functional outcome of burst fractures of the first lumbar vertebrae managed surgically and conservatively. Int Orthop. 2005;29:51–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cantor JB, Lebwohl NH, Garvey T, Eismont FJ. Nonoperative management of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures with early ambulation and bracing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:971–976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Celebi L, Muratli HH, Doğan O, Yağmurlu MF, Aktekin CN, Biçimoğlu A. [The efficacy of non-operative treatment of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar vertebrae][in Turkish]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2004;38:16–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chow GH, Nelson BJ, Gebhard JS, Brugman JL, Brown CW, Donaldson DH. Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures managed with hyperextension casting or bracing and early mobilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21:2170–2175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. In Higgins JP, Green S, eds. West Sussex, England: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.

  16. Dai LY. Remodeling of the spinal canal after thoracolumbar burst fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;382:119–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dai LY. Imaging diagnosis of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Chin Med Sci J. 2004;19:142–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dai LY, Jiang SD, Wang XY, Jiang LS. A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol. 2007;67:221–231; discussion 231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Klerk LW, Fontijne WP, Stijnen T, Braakman R, Tanghe HL, van Linge B. Spontaneous remodeling of the spinal canal after conservative management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23:1057–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8:817–831.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Denis F, Armstrong GW, Searls K, Matta L. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit: a comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;189:142–149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gertzbein SD; Scoliosis Research Society. Multicenter spine fracture study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17:528–540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenough CG. Recovery from low back pain: 1–5 year follow-up of 287 injury-related cases. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;254:1–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ha KI, Han SH, Chung M, Yang BK, Youn GH. A clinical study of the natural remodeling of burst fractures of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;323:210– 214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris JR Jr. Radiographic evaluation of spinal trauma. Orthop Clin North Am. 1986;17:75–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hitchon PW, Torner JC, Haddad SF, Follett KA. Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol. 1998;49:619–626; discussion 626–627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kraemer WJ, Schemitsch EH, Lever J, McBroom RJ, McKee MD, Waddell JP. Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:541–544.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Limb D, Shaw DL, Dickson RA. Neurological injury in thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:774–777.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Magel F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994;3:184–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McAfee PC, Bohlman HH, Yuan HA. Anterior decompression of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures with incomplete neurological deficit using a retroperitoneal approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:89–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McDonough PW, Davis R, Tribus C, Zdeblick TA. The management of acute thoracolumbar burst fractures with anterior corpectomy and Z-plate fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:1901–1908; discussion 1909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McNamara MJ, Stephens GC, Spengler DM. Transpedicular short-segment fusions of treatment for lumbar burst fractures. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5:183–187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–1900.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mumford J, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Goel VK. Thoracolumbar burst fractures: the clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:955–970.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ni WF, Huang YX, Chi YL, Xu HZ, Lin Y, Wang XY, Huang QS, Mao FM. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for neurologic intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:530–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oner FC, Ramos LM, Simmermacher RK, Kingma PT, Diekerhof CH, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ. Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility. A study of 53 patients using CT and MRI. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:235–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Oprel PP, Tuinebreijer WE, Patka P, den Hartog D. Combined anterior-posterior surgery versus posterior surgery for thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Open Orthop J. 2010;4:93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Reid DC, Hu R, Davis LA, Saboe LA. The nonoperative treatment of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction. J Trauma. 1988;28:1188–1194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3115–3124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sanderson PL, Fraser RD, Hall DJ, Cain CM, Osti OL, Potter GR. Short segment fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures without fusion. Eur Spine J. 1999;8:495–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sasso RC, Cotler HB. Posterior instrumentation and fusion for unstable fractures and fracture-dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a comparative study of three fixation devices in 70 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:450–460.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Scapinelli R, Candiotto S. Spontaneous remodeling of the spinal canal after burst fractures of the low thoracic and lumbar region. J Spinal Disord. 1995;8:486–493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shen WJ, Liu TJ, Shen YS. Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1038–1045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Shen WJ, Shen YS. Nonsurgical treatment of three-column thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:412–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Siebenga J, Leferink VJ, Segers MJ, Elzinga MJ, Bakker FC, Haarman HJ, Rommens PM, ten Duis HJ, Patka P. Treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: a multicenter prospective randomized study of operative versus nonsurgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2881–2890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Thomas KC, Bailey CS, Dvorak MF, Kwon B, Fisher C. Comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients without neurological deficit: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4:351–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tropiano P, Huang RC. Louis CA, Poitout DG, Louis RP. Functional and radiographic outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures managed by closed orthopaedic reduction and casting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:2459–2465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. van der Roer N, de Lange ES, Bakker FC, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW. Management of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:527–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Weinstein JN, Collalto P, Lehmann TR. Thoracolumbar “burst” fractures treated conservatively a long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13:33–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wilcox RK, Boerger TO, Allen DJ, Barton DC, Limb D, Dickson RA, Hall RM. A dynamic study of thoracolumbar burst fractures J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2184–2189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, Garvey T, Jhanjee R, Sechriest V, Butterman G. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:773–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wood KB, Bohn D, Mehbod A. Anterior versus posterior treatment of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: a prospective, randomized study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(suppl):15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wood KB, Khanna G, Vaccaro AR, Arnold PM, Harris MB, Mehbod AA. Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1423–1429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Yazici M, Atilla B, Tepe S, Calisir A. Spinal canal remodeling in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a computerized tomographic comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9:409–413.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Yi L, Jingping B, Gele J, Baoleri X, Taixiang W. Operative versus non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;Oct 18(4):CD005079.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian A. Harris MBBS, MMed(Clin Epid), PhD, FRACS(Orth).

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of their immediate family, has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

About this article

Cite this article

Gnanenthiran, S.R., Adie, S. & Harris, I.A. Nonoperative versus Operative Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit: A Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 567–577 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2157-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2157-7

Keywords

Navigation