Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shared Decision-making in Orthopaedic Surgery

  • Symposium: Value Based Healthcare
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

The process of clinical decision-making and the patient-physician relationship continue to evolve. Increasing patient involvement in clinical decision-making is embodied in the concept of “shared decision-making” (SDM), in which the patient and physician share responsibility in the clinical decision-making process. Various patients’ decision aid tools have been developed to enhance this process.

Questions/purposes

We therefore (1) describe decision-making models; (2) discuss the different types of patients’ decision aids available to practice SDM; and (3) describe the practice and early impact of SDM on clinical orthopaedic surgery.

Methods

We performed a search of the literature using PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library. We identified studies related to shared decision-making and the use of patients’ decision aids in orthopaedics. The search resulted in 113 titles, of which 21 were included with seven studies on patients’ decision aid use specifically in orthopaedics.

Results

Although limited studies suggest the use of patients’ decision aids may enhance decision-making, conclusions about the use of these aids in orthopaedic clinical practice cannot be made and further research examining the best type, timing, and content of patients’ decision aids that will lead to maximum patient involvement and knowledge gains with minimal clinical workflow interruption are needed.

Conclusion

In clinical practice today, patients are increasingly involved in clinical decision-making. Further research on SDM in orthopaedic surgery examining the feasibility and impact on practice, on patients’ willingness and ability to actively participate in shared decision-making, and the timing and type of patients’ decision aids appropriate for use is still needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adam JA, Khaw FM, Thomson RG, Gregg PJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA. Patient decision aids in joint replacement surgery: a literature review and an opinion survey of consultant orthopaedic surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:198–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arora NK, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Med Care. 2000;38:335–341.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballantyne PJ, Gignac MA, Hawker GA. A patient-centered perspective on surgery avoidance for hip or knee arthritis: lessons for the future. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett PH, Beck A, Schmid K, Fireman B, Brown JB. Treatment decisions about lumbar herniated disk in a shared decision-making program. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28:211–219.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barry MJ. Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:127–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Braddock C 3rd, Hudak PL, Feldman JJ, Bereknyei S, Frankel RM, Levinson W. ‘Surgery is certainly one good option’: quality and time-efficiency of informed decision-making in surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1830–1838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bryant D, Bednarski E, Gafni A. Incorporating patient preferences into orthopaedic practice: should the orthopaedic encounter change? Injury. 2006;37:328–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–692.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–661.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ. 1999;319:780–782.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark JP, Hudak PL, Hawker GA, Coyte PC, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, Wright JG. The moving target: a qualitative study of elderly patients’ decision-making regarding total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1366–1374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:112–121.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deber RB. Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information. CMAJ. 1994;151:171–176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deber RB. Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate. CMAJ. 1994;151:423–427.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1414–1420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Urowitz S, Sharpe N. Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations. Health Expect. 2007;10:248–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Weinstein J, Howe J, Ciol M, Mulley AG Jr. Involving patients in clinical decisions: impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery. Med Care. 2000;38:959–969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:2221–2226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Epstein RM, Alper BS, Quill TE. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA. 2004;291:2359–2366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Estabrooks C, Goel V, Thiel E, Pinfold P, Sawka C, Williams I. Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001;6:170–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Evans R, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Making interactive decision support for patients a reality. Inform Prim Care. 2004;12:109–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fraenkel L, Rabidou N, Wittink D, Fried T. Improving informed decision-making for patients with knee pain. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:1894–1898.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frosch DL, Kaplan RM. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:285–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hawker GA. Who, when, and why total joint replacement surgery? The patient’s perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18:526–530.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hudak PL, Armstrong K, Braddock C 3rd, Frankel RM, Levinson W. Older patients’ unexpressed concerns about orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1427–1435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Ware JE Jr. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:497–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN. Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med. 1997;102:524–530.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Legare F, Ratte S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:526–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P. Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1005–1012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Molenaar S, Sprangers MA, Postma-Schuit FC, Rutgers EJ, Noorlander J, Hendriks J, de Haes HC. Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Med Decis Making. 2000;20:112–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KB, Entwistle VA, Fiset V, Holmes-Rovner M, Khangura S, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD001431.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M, Tait V, Tetroe J, Fiset V, Barry M, Jones J. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2:CD001431.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Perestelo-Perez L, Perez-Ramos J, Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Rivero-Santana A, Serrano-Aguilar P. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment decisions in Spain: preliminary results. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80:364–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Phelan EA, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Weinstein JN, Ciol MA, Kreuter W, Howe JF. Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:206–211; discussion 212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenberger PH, Jokl P, Cameron A, Ickovics JR. Shared decision making, preoperative expectations, and postoperative reality: differences in physician and patient predictions and ratings of knee surgery outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:562–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:102–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Spunt BS, Deyo RA, Taylor VM, Leek KM, Goldberg HI, Mulley AG. An interactive videodisc program for low back pain patients. Health Educ Res. 1996;11:535–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Stacey D, Hawker G, Dervin G, Tomek I, Cochran N, Tugwell P, O’Connor AM. Management of chronic pain: improving shared decision making in osteoarthritis. BMJ. 2008;336:954–955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA.1984;252:2990–2994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. 1999;319:766–771.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Vranceanu AM, Cooper C, Ring D. Integrating patient values into evidence-based practice: effective communication for shared decision-making. Hand Clin. 2009;25:83–96, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Weinstein J. The missing piece: embracing shared decision making to reform health care. Spine. 2000;25:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Weng HH, Kaplan RM, Boscardin WJ, Maclean CH, Lee IY, Chen W, Fitzgerald JD. Development of a decision aid to address racial disparities in utilization of knee replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:568–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation for their support in funding this study and the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making for their support in providing the patients’ decision aids.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Slover MD, MS.

Additional information

The institution of one or more of the authors (JS) has received research funding support from the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation and the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making for this study.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

This work was conducted at NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA.

About this article

Cite this article

Slover, J., Shue, J. & Koenig, K. Shared Decision-making in Orthopaedic Surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 1046–1053 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2156-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2156-8

Keywords

Navigation