Skip to main content
Log in

Does a Modified Gap-balancing Technique Result in Medial-pivot Knee Kinematics in Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty?: A Pilot Study

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of The Knee Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Normal knee kinematics is characterized by posterior femorotibial rollback with tibial internal rotation and medial-pivot rotation in flexion. Cruciate-retaining TKAs (CR-TKAs) do not reproduce normal knee kinematics.

Questions/purposes

We hypothesized a more anatomic reconstruction of the medial femoral condyle, simultaneously preserving the tension of the PCL and medial collateral ligament, resulted in (1) medial-pivot rotation and tibial internal rotation, (2) lateral femoral rollback, and (3) reduced liftoff.

Patients and Methods

We compared 10 patients who underwent CR-TKA using the new technique at their 1-year followup to a matched control group of nine patients using a traditional gap-balancing technique at their 2- to 4-year followup. All patients received lateral radiographs in extension and flexion, which we utilized for three-dimensional implant matching to calculate tibial internal rotation, lateral rollback, and lateral liftoff in extension and flexion.

Results

The new gap-balancing technique resulted in a median of 3.5° tibial internal rotation with 2.7-mm rollback of the lateral femoral condyle relative to the medial condyle in flexion, which was different from the control group. We found no differences in liftoff between the groups.

Conclusions

The new technique resulted in tibial internal rotation with flexion and lateral rollback comparing the lateral to the medial condyle in flexion, but no differences in condylar liftoff. These preliminary results were comparable to published kinematic results of an asymmetric CR-TKA or medial-pivot CR-TKA but not to symmetric CR-TKA.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–D
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banks SA, Hodge WA. Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996;43:638–649.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertin KC, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Hoff WA, Anderson DT, Langer T. In vivo determination of posterior femoral roll-back for subjects having a NexGen posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:1040–1048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bull AM, Kessler O, Alam M, Amis AA. Changes in knee kinematics reflect the articular geometry after arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2491–2499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE Jr, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:47–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi G, Argenson JN, Insall J, Mahfouz M, Aubaniac JM, Haas B. In vivo three-dimensional determination of kinematics for subjects with a normal knee or a unicompartmental or total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(suppl 2):104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Walker SA, Cheal EJ, Stiehl JB. Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:33–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis DA, Mahfouz MR, Komistek RD, Hoff W. In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. J Biomech. 2005;38:241–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1196–1198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Insall J, Ranawat CS, Scott WN, Walker P. Total condylar knee replacement: preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;120:149–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johal P, Williams A, Wragg P, Hunt D, Gedroyc W. Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee: a study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using “interventional” MRI. J Biomech. 2005;38:269–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Komatsu T, Nakagawa S, Yamano Y. Effects of posterior cruciate ligament resection on the tibiofemoral joint gap. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391:210–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kesman TJ, Kane PH, Kaufman KR, Trousdale RT. Caution required when using an intraoperative knee balancer in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:829–831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:69–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurosawa H, Walker PS, Abe S, Garg A, Hunter T. Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. J Biomech. 1985;18:487–499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mannan K, Scott G. The Medial Rotation total knee replacement: a clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of six years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:750–756.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miyazaki Y, Nakamura T, Kogame K, Saito M, Yamamoto K, Suguro T. Analysis of the kinematics of total knee prostheses with a medial pivot design. J Arthroplasty. 2010 December 6 [Epub ahead of print].

  17. Nozaki H, Banks SA, Suguro T, Hodge WA. Observations of femoral roll-back in cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:308–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinskerova V, Johal P, Nakagawa S, Sosna A, Williams A, Gedroyc W, Freeman MA. Does the femur roll-back with flexion? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:925–931.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pritchett JW. Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:979–982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pritchett JW. Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or the medial pivot total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:224–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt R, Komistek RD, Blaha JD, Penenberg BL, Maloney WJ. Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciate-retaining and medial pivot knee implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:139–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schnurr C, Csécsei G, Nessler J, Eysel P, König DP. How much tibial resection is required in total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2011;35:989–994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA. Detrimental kinematics of a flat on flat total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;365:139–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Paxson RD, Hoff WA. Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;776:884–889.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Scott Banks, PhD, for assistance in JointTrack and Karen Aneshansley for proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Fitz MD.

Additional information

The institution of one or more of the authors (WF, TM) has received funding from Conformis Inc, Burlington, MA, USA. Drs. Fitz and Minas are members of the scientific advisory board, hold consultancies, have stock and stock option ownership, and receive royalties for intellectual property from Conformis Inc. Dr. Fitz has received research support from Oped Inc (Framingham, MA, USA) and iGetBetter Inc (Waltham, MA, USA). Dr. Minas is a consultant for Genzyme Corp (Cambridge, MA, USA). Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of their immediate family, has no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA approval status, of any drug or device before clinical use.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Fitz, W., Sodha, S., Reichmann, W. et al. Does a Modified Gap-balancing Technique Result in Medial-pivot Knee Kinematics in Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty?: A Pilot Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 91–98 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2121-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2121-6

Keywords

Navigation