Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Otto Aufranc Award: Demineralized Bone Matrix Around Porous Implants Promotes Rapid Gap Healing and Bone Ingrowth

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of The Hip Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Noncemented revision arthroplasty is often complicated by the presence of bone implant gaps that reduce initial stability and biologic fixation. Demineralized bone matrix has osteoinductive properties and therefore the potential to enhance gap healing and porous implant fixation.

Questions/purposes

We determined at what times and to what extent demineralized bone matrix promotes gap healing and bone ingrowth around a porous implant.

Methods

We inserted porous titanium implants into the proximal metaphyses of canine femora and humeri, with an initial 3-mm gap between host cancellous bone and implants. We left the gaps empty (control; n = 12) or filled them with either demineralized bone matrix (n = 6) or devitalized demineralized bone matrix (negative control; n = 6) and left them in situ for 4 or 12 weeks. We quantified volume healing of the gap with new bone using three-dimensional micro-CT scanning and quantified apposition and ingrowth using backscattered scanning electron microscopy.

Results

The density of bone inside gaps filled with demineralized bone matrix reached 64% and 93% of surrounding bone density by 4 and 12 weeks, respectively. Compared with empty controls and negative controls at 4 and 12 weeks, gap healing using demineralized bone matrix was two to three times greater and bone ingrowth and apposition were up to 15 times greater.

Conclusions

Demineralized bone matrix promotes rapid bone ingrowth and gap healing around porous implants.

Clinical Relevance

Demineralized bone matrix has potential for enhancing implant fixation in revision arthroplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–C
Fig. 2A–B
Fig. 3A–F
Fig. 4A–F
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, Shepherd L, Holtom P. Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:716–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bae H, Zhao L, Zhu D, Kanim LE, Wang JC, Delamarter RB. Variability across ten production lots of a single demineralized bone matrix product. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:427–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bae HW, Zhao L, Kanim LE, Wong P, Delamarter RB, Dawson EG. Intervariability and intravariability of bone morphogenetic proteins in commercially available demineralized bone matrix products. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:1299–1306; discussion 1307–1308.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barrack RL, Cook SD, Patrón LP, Salkeld SL, Szuszczewicz E, Whitecloud TS 3rd. Induction of bone ingrowth from acetabular defects to a porous surface with OP-1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:41–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bobyn JD. Next generation porous metals for biologic fixation. In: Glassman AH, Lachiewicz PF, Tanzer, M, eds. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Hip and Knee Reconstruction 4. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2011:45–58.

  6. Boyan BD, Sylvia VL, Liu Y, Sagun R, Cochran DL, Lohmann CH, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Surface roughness mediates its effects on osteoblasts via protein kinase A and phospholipase A2. Biomaterials. 1999;20:2305–2310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook SD, Salkeld SL, Patron LP, Barrack RL. The effect of demineralized bone matrix gel on bone ingrowth and fixation of porous implants. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:402–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Efe T, Schmitt J. Analyses of prosthesis stem failures in noncemented modular hip revision prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:665.e7–665.e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Einhorn TA, Lane JM, Burstein AH, Kopman CR, Vigorita VJ. The healing of segmental bone defects induced by demineralized bone matrix: a radiographic and biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:274–279.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Finkemeier CG. Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:454–464.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gamradt SC, Lieberman JR. Bone graft for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and future applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:183–194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, Forster RA. Alternatives to autogenous bone graft: efficacy and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greis PE, Kang JD, Silvaggio V, Rubash HE. A long-term study on defect filling and bone ingrowth using a canine fiber metal total hip model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:47–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gross AE, Duncan CP, Garbuz D, Mohamed EM. Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum in association with loss of bone stock. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:57–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hacking SA, Harvey EJ, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD. Acid etched microtexture for enhancement of bone growth into porous coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:1182–1189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Harvey EJ, Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD. Relative contributions of chemistry and topography to the osseointegration of hydroxyapatite coatings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:24–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jafari SM, Bender B, Coyle C, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:459–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen TB, Overgaard S, Lind M, Rahbeck O, Bünger C, Søballe K. Osteogenic protein-1 increases the fixation of implants grafted with morcellised bone allograft and ProOsteon bone substitute: an experimental study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:121–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones AC, Arns CH, Sheppard AP, Hutmacher DW, Milthorpe BK, Knackstedt MA. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2491–2504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson EE, Urist MR, Finerman GA. Resistant nonunions and partial or complete segmental defects of long bones: treatment with implants of a composite of human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and autolyzed, antigen-extracted, allogeneic (AAA) bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;277:229–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kakiuchi M, Hosoya T, Takaoka K, Amitani K, Ono K. Human bone matrix gelatin as a clinical alloimplant: a retrospective review of 160 cases. Int Orthop. 1985;9:181–188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang JD, McKernan DJ, Kruger M, Mutschler T, Thompson WH, Rubash HE. Ingrowth and formation of bone in defects in an uncemented fiber-metal total hip-replacement model in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:93–105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Cochran DL, Simpson J, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32:55–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kosashvili Y, Safir O, Backstein D, Lakstein D, Gross AE. Salvage of failed acetabular cages by nonbuttressed trabecular metal cups. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:466–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lee P, Gross AE. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered stem. Hip Int. 2010;20:136–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maruyama M, Terayama K, Ito M, Takei T, Kitagawa E. Hydroxyapatite clay for gap filling and adequate bone ingrowth. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:329–336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nehme A, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:201–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oakes DA, Lee CC, Lieberman JR. An evaluation of demineralized bone matrices in a rat femoral defect model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;413:281–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramappa M, Bajwa A, Kulkarni A, McMurtry I, Port A. Early results of a new highly porous modular acetabular cup in revision arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2009;19:239–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sampath TK, Reddi AH. Dissociative extraction and reconstitution of bone matrix components involved in local bone differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:7599–7603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwartz Z, Mellonig JT, Carnes DL Jr, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Ability of commercial demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to induce new bone formation. J Periodontol. 1996;67:918–926.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shen WJ, Chung KC, Wang GJ, Balian G, McLaughlin RE. Demineralized bone matrix in the stabilization of porous-coated implants in bone defects in rabbits. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;293:346–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shih HN, Shih LY, Sung TH, Chang YC. Restoration of bone defect and enhancement of bone ingrowth using partially demineralized bone matrix and marrow stromal cells. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1293–1299.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Turek T, Seeherman H, Wozney JM. Locally delivered rhBMP-2 enhances bone ingrowth and gap healing in a canine model. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:58–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Virdi AS, Inoue N. Additive enhancement of implant fixation following combined treatment with rhTGF-beta2 and rhBMP-2 in a canine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:806–817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tiedeman JJ, Connolly JF, Strates BS, Lippiello L. Treatment of nonunion by percutaneous injection of bone marrow and demineralised bone matrix—an experimental study in dogs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;268:294–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang J, Glimcher MJ. Characterization of matrix induced osteogenesis in rat calvarial bone defects: II. Origins of bone-forming cells. Calcif Tissue Int. 1999;65:486–493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wazen RM, Lefebvre LP, Baril E, Nanci A. Initial evaluation of bone ingrowth into a novel porous titanium coating. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;94:64–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Research Council Canada for manufacturing and donating the implants, Osteotech Inc for provision of the canine DBM material, and Dr. Lawrence Joseph for professional statistical advice. The authors also thank Eric Baril, PhD, and Fabrice Bernier, PhD, at the National Research Council Canada for their invaluable instruction on micro-CT scanning and S. Adam Hacking, PhD, for assistance with image analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Dennis Bobyn PhD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The institution of one or more of the authors (LL, JDB, KMB, MT) has received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the animal protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

This work was performed at McGill University.

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, L., Bobyn, J.D., Bobyn, K.M. et al. The Otto Aufranc Award: Demineralized Bone Matrix Around Porous Implants Promotes Rapid Gap Healing and Bone Ingrowth. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 357–365 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2011-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2011-y

Keywords

Navigation