Skip to main content
Log in

How Does Participation of Youth With Spina Bifida Vary by Age?

  • Symposium: Myelomeningocele
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Youth with disabilities are at risk for decreased participation in community activities. However, little is known about participation at different developmental periods of childhood and adolescence among youth with spina bifida (SB) or whether child, family, and SB-associated factors influence participation.

Questions/purposes

Our cross-sectional study examined participation among youth with SB and assessed how participation differs between youth ages 2–5, 6–12, and 13–18; how participation relates to child (gender) and family (caregiver marital status, education, and employment) characteristics; and how participation relates to SB-related factors (motor level, hydrocephalus, ambulation, medical issues, and bladder/bowel needs).

Patients and Methods

Sixty-three youth ages 2–18 years and/or their caregivers completed age-appropriate measures of participation for youth with disabilities. The patients had an average age of 9.52 years (SD = 5.22), 83% had a shunt, 34% had a motor level of L2 or higher, and 66% L3 or lower.

Results

A comparison of youth ages 2–5 (n = 19), 6–12 (n = 21), and 13–18 (n = 23) revealed older youth participated less in recreational, physical, and skill-based activities. Caregiver employment facilitated participation in social activities. Youth who did not have a shunt participated more often in physical and skill-based activities. Youth without recent major medical issues participated more often in physical and social activities. More caregivers reported bladder and bowel needs as barriers to participation for youth ages 6–12 than those ages 2–5 or 13–18.

Conclusions

Participation of youth with SB varies by age and across child and caregiver factors and should be understood in a developmental and situational context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernstein DA, Roy EJ, Scull TK, Wickens CD. Psychology. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boudos RM, Mukherjee S. Barriers to community participation: teens and young adults with spina bifida. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2008;1:303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown M, Gordon WA. Impact of impairment on activity patterns of children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:828–832.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buffart LM, Roebroeck ME, Rol M, Stam HJ, van den Berg-Emons RJ. Triad of physical activity, aerobic fitness and obesity in adolescents and young adults with myelomeningocele. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:70–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buffart LM, Van den Berg-Emons RJG, Van Meeteren J. Lifestyle, participation, and health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:886–894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buffart LM, van der Ploeg HP, Bauman AE, Van Asbeck FW, Stam HJ, Roebroeck ME, van den Berg-Emons RJG. Sports participation in adolescents and young adults with myelomeningocele and its role in total physical activity behaviour and fitness. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:702–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buran CF, Sawin KJ, Brei TJ, Fastenau PS. Adolescents with myelomeningocele: activities, beliefs, expectations, and perceptions. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:244–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caldwell LL, Gilbert AA. Leisure, health and disability: a review and discussion. Can J Commun Ment Health. 1990;9:111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hammal D, Jarvis SN, Colver AF. Participation of children with cerebral palsy is influenced by where they live. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:292–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson KL, Dudgeon B, Kuehn C, Walker W. Assistive technology use among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:330–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. King GA, Law M, King S, Hurley P, Hanna S, Kertoy M, Rosenbaum P. Measuring children’s participation in recreation and leisure activities: construct validation of the CAPE and PAC. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2007;33:28–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. King GA, Law M, King S, Hurley P, Rosenbaum P, Hanna S, Kertoy M, Young N. Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment & Preferences for Activities of Children: Manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. King G, Petrenchik T, Law M, Hurley P. The enjoyment of formal and informal recreation and leisure activities: a comparison of school-aged children with and without physical disabilities. Int J Disabil Dev Education. 2009;56:109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klaas SJ, Kelly EH, Gorzkowski JA, Homko E, Vogel LC. Assessing patterns of participation and enjoyment in pediatric spinal cord injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:468–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Law M, King G, King S, Kertoy M, Hurley P, Rosenbaum P, Young N, Hanna S. Patterns of participation in recreational and leisure activities among children with complex physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:337–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Longmuir PE, Bar-Or O. Factors influencing the physical activity levels of youths with physical and sensory disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 2000;17:40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lyons RF. Meaningful activity and disability. Capitalizing upon the potential of outreach recreation networks in Canada. Can J Rehabil. 1993;6:256–265.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morris C. Measuring participation in childhood disability: how does the capability approach improve our understanding? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:92–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Petrenchik T, Law M, King G, Hurley P, Forhan M, Kertoy M. Assessment of Preschool Children’s Participation. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pett MA. Nonparametric Statistics for Health Care Research: Statistics for Small Samples and Unusual Distributions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rimmer JH, Braddock D, Fujiura G. Prevalence of obesity in adults with mental-retardation—implications for health promotion and disease prevention. Mental Retardation. 1993;31:105–110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roebroeck ME, Hempenius L, Van Baalen B, Hendriksen JGM, Van Den Berg-Emons HJG, Stam HJ. Cognitive functioning of adolescents and young adults with meningomyelocele and level of everyday physical activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1237–1242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoenmakers MAGC, de Groot JF, Gorter JW, Hillaert JLM, Helders PJM, Takken T. Muscle strength, aerobic capacity and physical activity in independent ambulating children with lumbosacral spina bifida. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:259–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Simeonsson RJ, Carlson D, Huntington GS, McMillen JS, Brent JL. Students with disabilities: a national survey of participation in school activities. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:49–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van den Berg-Emons HJ, Bussmann JB, Brobbel AS, Roebroeck ME, van Meeteren J, Stam HJ. Everyday physical activity in adolescents and young adults with meningomyelocele as measured with a novel activity monitor. J Pediatr. 2001;139:880–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van den Berg-Emons HJ, Bussmann JBJ, Meyerink HJ, Roebroeck ME, Stam HJ. Body fat, fitness and level of everyday physical activity in adolescents and young adults with meningomyelocele. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:271–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Whiteneck GG. Measuring what matters: key rehabilitation outcomes. The 44th Annual John Stanley Coulter Lecture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1073–1076.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the youth and their caregivers who participated in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin H. Kelly PhD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

This work was funded by Shriners Hospitals for Children®, grant 9143 (LCV).

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at Shriners Hospitals for Children®, Chicago, IL, USA; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; and Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 7

Table 7 Activities listed in the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE)* and Assessment of Preschool Children’s Participation (APCP)

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, E.H., Altiok, H., Gorzkowski, J.A. et al. How Does Participation of Youth With Spina Bifida Vary by Age?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 1236–1245 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1693-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1693-x

Keywords

Navigation