Skip to main content
Log in

Hip Dislocation: Are Hip Precautions Necessary in Anterior Approaches?

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2010
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

In 2005, we reported removal of functional restriction after primary THA performed through the anterolateral approach did not increase the incidence of dislocation.

Questions/purposes

To develop a current practice guideline, we evaluated the incidence of early dislocation after primary THA after implementation of a no-restriction protocol.

Methods

Between January 2005 and December 2007, 2532 patients (2764 hips; 1541 women, 1223 men; mean age, 63.2 years [28–98 years]) underwent primary THA at our institution. Bilateral THA was performed in 232 patients (464 hips). The direct anterior or anterolateral approach was used in all patients. Femoral head size was 28, 32, or 36 mm. Patients were given no traditional functional restrictions postoperatively, such as use of elevated seats, abduction pillows, and restriction from driving. All patients received standard care at the judgment of the attending surgeon. One hundred forty-six patients missed followup appointments despite efforts to be contacted by telephone. The remaining 2386 of 2532 patients (94%) had a minimum followup of 6 months (mean, 14.2 months; range, 6–34 months).

Results

Four known dislocations occurred in the followed cohort of 2386 patients with 2612 hips (0.15%) at a mean of 5 days (3–12 days) postoperatively, none related to high-impact trauma. One dislocation occurred in a patient with a history of developmental dysplasia of the hip, two dislocations occurred while at the toilet (one with a previous hip fracture treated with a modular system), and one dislocation was idiopathic.

Conclusions

We confirmed a low incidence of dislocation after primary THA in the absence of early postoperative restrictions. We conclude a no-restriction protocol does not increase the incidence of early dislocation after primary THA.

Level of Evidence

Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:214–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;72:7–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hummel MT, Malkani AL, Yakkanti MR, Baker DL. Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 Suppl):73–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelley SS, Lachiewicz PF, Hickman JM, Paterno SM. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:163–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:19–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwon MS, Kuskowski M, Mulhall KJ, Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:34–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lubbeke A, Stern R, Garavaglia G, Zurcher L, Hoffmeyer P. Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:327–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mallory TH, Lombardi AV, Jr., Fada RA, Herrington SM, Eberle RW. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral abductor split approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;358:166–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:46–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrey BF. Difficult complications after hip joint replacement. Dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;344:179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moskal JT, Mann JW, 3rd. A modified direct lateral approach for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. A prospective analysis of 453 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:255–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murray JE. Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming. Mem Cognit. 1999;27:878–889.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paterno SA, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1202–1210.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peak EL, Parvizi J, Ciminiello M, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. The role of patient restrictions in reducing the prevalence of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:247–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peters CL, McPherson E, Jackson JD, Erickson JA. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 Suppl 2):140–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, Mahomed NN, Lingard EA, Guadagnoli E, Baron JA, Harris WH, Poss R, Katz JN. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:20–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;385:95–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sayed-Noor AS, Hugo A, Sjoden GO, Wretenberg P. Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of two methods of measurement. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1189–1193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Talbot NJ, Brown JH, Treble NJ. Early dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: are postoperative restrictions necessary? J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:1006–1008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ververeli PA, Lebby EB, Tyler C, Fouad C. Evaluation of reducing postoperative hip precautions in total hip replacement: a randomized prospective study. Orthopedics. 2009;32:889–893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295–1306.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard H. Rothman MD, PhD.

Additional information

Javad Parvizi is a consultant for Stryker Orthopaedics (Mahwah, NJ) and has Intellectual Properties on SmarTech (Philadelphia, PA); Richard H. Rothman is a consultant for and receives royalties from Stryker Orthopaedics.

Each author certifies that his/her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Restrepo, C., Mortazavi, S.M.J., Brothers, J. et al. Hip Dislocation: Are Hip Precautions Necessary in Anterior Approaches?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 417–422 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1668-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1668-y

Keywords

Navigation