Skip to main content
Log in

The Salto Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Survivorship and Analysis of Failures at 7 to 11 years

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Despite the appearance of new-generation, mobile-bearing, cementless prostheses, total ankle arthroplasty remains controversial. Among the criteria guiding the choice between arthrodesis and arthroplasty, the long-term survival and postoperative function are of critical importance. The mobile-bearing Salto prosthesis has been used in Europe since 1997, but only 2 to 5 years of followup data have been reported.

Questions/purposes

We analyzed the longer-term survivorship and causes of failures of the Salto prosthesis in a cohort of previously studied patients. We asked whether this prosthesis provided a functional ankle (AOFAS score) and durable radiographic fixation.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 96 prospectively followed patients with 98 prostheses implanted between 1997 and 2000. Of those, 85 patients (87 prostheses) had a minimum followup of 6.8 years (mean, 8.9 years; range, 6.8–11.1 years).

Results

The survival rate was 65% (95% CI, 50–80) with any reoperation of the ankle and 85% (95% CI, 75–95) with revision of a component as the end points. Six prostheses were removed for arthrodesis, and 18 ankles underwent reoperation without arthrodesis. We observed three main causes of reoperations: bone cysts (11 patients), fracture of the polyethylene (five patients), and unexplained pain (three patients). The mean AOFAS score was 79 ± 12 points. Radiographic subsidence was observed in three patients and bone cysts in eight patients.

Conclusions

Our data suggest a high rate of reoperations but only six revisions with arthrodesis with mid-term followup. We observed few patients with loosening and/or subsidence.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–F
Fig. 2A–B
Fig. 3A–D
Fig. 4
Fig. 5A–B
Fig. 6A–D
Fig. 7A–C

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A. Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses: three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1321–1329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer TW. Hydroxyapatite: coating controversies. Orthopedics. 1995;18:885–888.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Besse JL, Brito N, Lienhart C. Clinical evaluation and radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:964–975.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloebaum RD, Beeks D, Dorr LD, Savory CG, DuPont JA, Hofmann AA. Complications with hydroxyapatite particulate separation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:19–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier JA, Buscayret F, Graveleau N, Piriou P. Midterm results of the Salto total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:6–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonnin MP. [Total ankle arthroplasty] [in French]. Encycl Méd Chir Techniques chirurgicales – Orthopédie-Traumatologie. Editions Scientifiques et Médicales. Paris, France: Elsevier SAS; 2002;44–903.

  7. Bonnin MP, Laurent JR, Casillas M. Ankle function and sports activity after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:933–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ. Eighteen-year evaluation of cementless meniscal bearing total ankle replacements. Instr Course Lect. 2002;51:143–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ. Twenty-year evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Culpan P, Le Strat V, Piriou P, Judet T. Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1178–1183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doets HC, Brand R, Nelissen RG. Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1272–1284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Domsic RT, Saltzman CL. Ankle osteoarthritis scale. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:466–471.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Maffulli N. How successful are current ankle replacements?: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:199–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guidance for industry on the testing of metallic plasma sprayed coatings on orthopedic implants to support reconsideration of postmarket surveillance requirements. Available at: www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm107699.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2010.

  15. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1899–1905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanna RS, Haddad SL, Lazarus ML. Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:921–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Henricson A, Carlsson A, Rydholm U. What is a revision of total ankle replacement? Foot Ankle Surg. 2010; doi:10.1016/j.fas.2010.02.007.

  18. Henricson A, Skoog A, Carlsson A. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: an analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:569–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hopgood P, Kumar R, Wood PL. Ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1032–1038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosman AH, Mason RB, Hobbs T, Rothwell AG. A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:584–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeng CL, Kadakia A, White KL, Myerson MS. Fresh osteochondral total ankle allograft transplantation for the treatment of ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:554–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeng CL, Myerson MS. Allograft total ankle replacement: a dead ringer to the natural joint. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13:539–547, x.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparameteric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karantana A, Hobson S, Dhar S. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:951–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349–353.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, Zimmerman MB, Alliman KJ, Alvine FG, Saltzman CL. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty: seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1161–1171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kobayashi A, Minoda Y, Kadoya Y, Ohashi H, Takaoka K, Saltzman CL. Ankle arthroplasties generate wear particles similar to knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:69–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kofoed H. Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:73–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koivu H, Kohonen I, Sipola E, Alanen K, Vahlberg T, Tiusanen H. Severe periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after the ankle Evolutive system total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:907–914.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee DK. Ankle arthroplasty alternatives with allograft and external fixation: preliminary clinical outcome. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;47:447–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leszko F, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Ratron YA, Judet T, Bonnin M, Colombier JA, Lin SS. In vivo kinematics of the Salto total ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:1117–1125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morscher EW, Hefti A, Aebi U. Severe osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coating. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:267–272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Loibl M, Huber M, Rippstein PF. Habitual physical activity and sports participation after total ankle arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:95–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Rippstein PF. Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:815–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Piriou P, Culpan P, Mullins M, Cardon JN, Pozzi D, Judet T. Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: a comparative gait analysis study. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Piriou P, Tremoulet J, Garreau De Loubresse C, Judet T. [Subcutaneous tenotomy of Achille’s tendon in adults for ankle stiffness: a review of 80 cases] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86:38–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1410–1420.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rokkum M, Reigstad A, Johansson CB. HA particles can be released from well-fixed HA-coated stems: histopathology of biopsies from 20 hips 2-8 years after implantation. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:298–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roy-Camille R, Reignier B, Saillant G, Berteaux D. [Results of Papineua’s operation: apropos of 46 cases] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1976;62:347–362.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. San Giovanni TP, Keblish DJ, Thomas WH, Wilson MG. Eight-year results of a minimally constrained total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:418–426.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schmalzried TP, Jasty M, Harris WH. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:849–863.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Skyttä ET, Koivu H, Eskelinen A, Ikävalko M, Paavolainen P, Remes V. Total ankle replacement: a population-based study of 515 cases from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:114–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stilling M, Rahbek O, Soballe K. Inferior survival of hydroxyapatite versus titanium-coated cups at 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2872–2879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun L, Berndt CC, Gross KA, Kucuk A. Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: a review. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58:570–592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sun L, Berndt CC, Khor KA, Cheang HN, Gross KA. Surface characteristics and dissolution behavior of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;62:228–236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tellisi N, Fragomen AT, Kleinman D, O’Malley MJ, Rozbruch SR. Joint preservation of the osteoarthritic ankle using distraction arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:318–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Thomason K, Eyres KS. A technique of fusion for failed total replacement of the ankle: tibio-allograft-calcaneal fusion with a locked retrograde intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:885–888.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W. Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average followup of 65 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:47–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Valderrabano V, Pagenstert G, Horisberger M, Knupp M, Hintermann B. Sports and recreation activity of ankle arthritis patients before and after total ankle replacement. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:993–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. van Roermund PM, Marijnissen AC, Lafeber FP. Joint distraction as an alternative for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2002;7:515–527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wood PL, Deakin S. Total ankle replacement: the results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:334–341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wood PL, Prem H, Sutton C. Total ankle replacement: medium-term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:605–609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wood PL, Sutton C, Mishra V, Suneja R. A randomised, controlled trial of two mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:69–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Bonnin MD.

Additional information

One or more authors (MB, JAC and TJ) received royalties from Tornier SA, Montbonnot, France.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

This work was performed at Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.

About this article

Cite this article

Bonnin, M., Gaudot, F., Laurent, JR. et al. The Salto Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Survivorship and Analysis of Failures at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 225–236 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1453-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1453-y

Keywords

Navigation