Skip to main content
Log in

Objective Guidelines for Removing an External Fixator after Tibial Lengthening Using Pixel Value Ratio: A Pilot Study

  • Basic Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

During limb lengthening over an intramedullary nail, decisions regarding external fixator removal and weightbearing depend on the amount of callus seen at the lengthening area on radiographs. However, this method is subjective and objective evaluation of the amount of callus likely would minimize nail or interlocking screw breakage and refracture after fixator removal. We asked how many cortices with full corticalization of the newly formed bone at the lengthening area are needed to allow fixator removal and full weightbearing and how to radiographically determine the stage of corticalization. We retrospectively reviewed 17 patients (34 lengthenings) who underwent bilateral tibial lengthenings over an intramedullary nail. The average gain in length was 7.2 ± 3.4 cm. We determined the pixel value ratio (ratio of pixel value of regenerate versus the mean pixel value of adjacent bone) of the lengthened area on radiographs. There were no nail or screw breakage and refracture. Partial weightbearing with crutches was permitted when the pixel value ratio was 1 in two cortices and full weightbearing without crutches was permitted when the pixel value ratio was 1 in three cortices. The pixel value ratio on radiographs can be an objective parameter for callus measurement and may provide guidelines for the timing of external fixator removal. We cannot determine from our limited data the minimum pixel value in how many cortices would suggest safe removal, but we can say our criteria were not associated with subsequent refracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–I
Fig. 2A–C
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aquerreta JD, Forriol F, Canadell J. Complications of bone lengthening. Int Orthop. 1994;18:299–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Catagni M. Imaging techniques: the radiographic classification of bone regenerate during distraction. In: Maiocchi AB, Aronson J, eds. Operative Principles of Ilizarov. London, UK: Williams & Wilkins; 1991;5:53–57.

  3. Chakkalakal DA, Lippiello L, Wilson RF, Shindell R, Connolly JF. Mineral and matrix contributions to rigidity in fracture healing. J Biomech. 1990;23:425–434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Backer AI, Mortele KJ, De Keulenaer BL. Picture archiving and communication system: Part one: filmless radiology and distance radiology. JBR-BTR. 2004;87:234–241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi-Brivio L, Trivella G. Limb lengthening by callus distraction (callotasis). J Pediatr Orthop. 1987;7:129–134.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Donnan LT, Saleh M, Rigby AS, McAndrew A. Radiographic assessment of bone formation in tibia during distraction histiogenesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:645–651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eyres KS, Bell MJ, Kanis JA. New bone formation during leg lengthening: evaluated by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:96–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eyres KS, Bell MJ, Kanis JA. Methods of assessing new bone formation during limb lengthening: ultrasonography, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and radiography compared. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:358–364.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischgrund J, Paley D, Suter C. Variables affecting time to bone healing during limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:31–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hazra S, Song HR, Biswal S, Lee SH, Lee SH, Jang KM, Modi HN. Quantitative assessment of mineralization in distraction osteogenesis. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:843–847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Kilicoglu O, Burc H, Cakmak M. Complications encountered during lengthening over an intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2406–2411.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kojimoto H, Yasui N, Goto T, Matsuda S, Shimomura Y. Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction: the role of periosteum and endosteum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:543–549.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kristiansen LP, Steen H. Lengthening of the tibia over an intramedullary nail, using the Ilizarov external fixator: major complications and slow consolidation in 9 lengthenings. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:271–274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lauterburg MT, Exner GU, Jacob HA. Forces involved in lower limb lengthening: an in vivo biomechanical study. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:1815–1822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li R, Saleh M, Yang L, Coulton L. Radiographic classification of osteogenesis during bone distraction. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:339–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maffulli N, Cheng JC, Sher A, Ng BK, Ng E. Bone mineralization at the callotasis site after completion of lengthening. Bone. 1999;25:333–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Minematsu K, Tsuchiya H, Taki J, Tomita K. Blood flow measurement during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;347:229–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Paley D. Current techniques of limb lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8:73–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:81–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, Bhave A. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail: a matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1464–1480.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park HW, Yang KH, Lee KS, Joo SY, Kwak YH, Kim HW. Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail with use of the Ilizarov external fixator for idiopathic short stature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1970–1978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Powell ES, Lawford PV, Duckworth T, Black MM. Is callus calcium content an indicator of the mechanical strength of healing fractures? An experimental study in rat metatarsals. J Biomed Eng. 1989;11:277–281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Romanowski CA, Underwood AC, Sprigg A. Reduction of radiation doses in leg lengthening procedures by means of audit and computed tomography scanogram techniques. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:1103–1107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Salmas MG, Nikiforidis G, Sakellaropoulos G, Kosti P, Lambiris E. Estimation of artifacts induced by the Ilizarov device in quantitative computed tomographic analysis of tibiae. Injury. 1998;29:711–716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shim JS, Chung KH, Ahn JM. Value of measuring bone density serial changes on a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) monitor in distraction osteogenesis. Orthopedics. 2002;25:1269–1272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Song HR, Oh CW, Mattoo R, Park BC, Kim SJ, Park IH, Jeon IH, Ihn CH. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail using the external fixator: risk of infection and knee problems in 22 patients with a follow-up of 2 years or more. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:245–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tselentakis G, Owen PJ, Richardson JB, Kuiper JH, Haddaway MJ, Dwyer JS, Evans GA. Fracture stiffness in callotasis determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10:248–254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vade A, Eissenstat R. Radiographic features of bone lengthening procedures. Radiology. 1990;174:531–537.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Young JW, Kovelman H, Resnik CS, Paley D. Radiologic assessment of bones after Ilizarov procedures. Radiology. 1990;177:89–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae Ryong Song MD, PhD.

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A080588).

Each author certifies that his or her institute has approved or waived approval for the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

This study was performed at Korea University School of Medicine.

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Fan, Q., Venkatesh, K.P. et al. Objective Guidelines for Removing an External Fixator after Tibial Lengthening Using Pixel Value Ratio: A Pilot Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 3321–3326 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1011-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1011-7

Keywords

Navigation