Skip to main content
Log in

Shoulder Arthroplasties have Fewer Complications than Hip or Knee Arthroplasties in US Veterans

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 September 2010

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 September 2010

Abstract

Total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA) are being performed more commonly for treatment of arthritis, although fewer than either hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasties. Total shoulder arthroplasty also provides general health improvements that are comparable to THA. One study suggests TSAs are associated with lower morbidity and mortality than THAs and TKAs. To confirm and extend that study, we therefore examined the association of patient characteristics (sociodemographics, comorbid illness, and other risk factors) with 30-day complications for patients undergoing TSAs, THAs, or TKAs. We used data from the Veterans Administration (VA) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) for fiscal years 1999 to 2006. Sociodemographics, comorbidities, health behaviors, operative factors, and complications (mortality, return to the operating room, readmission within 14 days, cardiovascular events, and infections) were available for 10,407 THAs, 23,042 TKAs, and 793 TSAs. Sociodemographic features were comparable among groups. The mean operative time was greater for TSAs (3.0 hours) than for TKAs (2.2 hours) and THAs (2.4 hours). The 30-day mortality rates were 1.2%, 1.1%, and 0.4% for THAs, TKAs, and TSAs, respectively. The corresponding postoperative complication rates were 7.6%, 6.8%, and 2.8%. Adjusting for multiple risk factors, complications, readmissions, and postoperative stays were less for TSAs versus THAs and TKAs. In a VA population, TSAs required more operative time but resulted in shorter stays, fewer complications, and fewer readmissions than THAs and TKAs.

Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams JE, Sperling JW, Hoskin TL, Melton LJ 3rd, Cofield RH. Shoulder arthroplasty in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976–2000: a population-based study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:50–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allison PD. Logistic Regression Using SAS System: Theory and Application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boorman RS, Kopjar B, Fehringer E, Churchill RS, Smith K, Matsen FA 3rd. The effect of total shoulder arthroplasty on self-assessed health status is comparable to that of total hip arthroplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12:158–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M, Gartsman GM, Guyatt G, Kirkley A. A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1947–1956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cowper DC, Kubal JD, Maynard C, Hynes DM. A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:462–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Daley J, Forbes MG, Young GJ, Charns MP, Gibbs JO, Hur K, Henderson W, Khuri SF. Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure. National VA Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:341–351.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Farmer KW, Hammond JW, Queale WS, Keyurapan E, McFarland EG. Shoulder arthroplasty versus hip and knee arthroplasties: a comparison of outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:183–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fehringer EV, Kopjar B, Boorman RS, Churchill RS, Smith KL, Matsen FA 3rd. Characterizing the functional improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1349–1353.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Franta AK, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Neradilek B, Matsen FA 3rd. The complex characteristics of 282 unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:555–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ibrahim SA, Stone RA, Han X, Cohen P, Fine MJ, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Kwoh CK. Racial/ethnic differences in surgical outcomes in veterans following knee or hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3143–3151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain NB, Guller U, Pietrobon R, Bond TK, Higgins LD. Co-morbidities increase complication rates in patients having arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:232–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Barbour G, Lowry P, Irvin G, Gibbs J, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Stremple JF, et al. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:519–531.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G 3rd, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Gibbs JO, Barbour G, Demakis J, Irvin G 3rd, Stremple JF, Grover F, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Fabri PJ, Spencer J, Hammermeister K, Aust JB. Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:315–327.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Norris TR, Iannotti JP. Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:130–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson M, Perry S, Helba H, Hintze W, Wright M, Lee K, Greenlees J, Rockwell D, Deak MA, for the US Department of Veterans Affairs. 2001 National Survey of Veterans. 2006. Available at: http://www1.va.gov/vetdata/docs/NSV%20Final%20Report.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2009.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward V. Fehringer MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

This work was performed at the Nebraska Arthritis Outcomes Research Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1593-0

About this article

Cite this article

Fehringer, E.V., Mikuls, T.R., Michaud, K.D. et al. Shoulder Arthroplasties have Fewer Complications than Hip or Knee Arthroplasties in US Veterans. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 717–722 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0996-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0996-2

Keywords

Navigation