Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can Porous Tantalum Be Used to Achieve Ankle and Subtalar Arthrodesis?: A Pilot Study

  • Surgical Technique
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

A structural graft often is needed to fill gaps during reconstructive procedures of the ankle and hindfoot. Autograft, the current gold standard, is limited in availability and configuration and is associated with donor-site morbidity in as much as 48%, whereas the alternative allograft carries risks of disease transmission and collapse. Trabecular metal (tantalum), with a healing rate similar to that of autograft, high stability, and no donor-site morbidity, has been used in surgery of the hip, knee, and spine. However, its use has not been documented in foot and ankle surgery. We retrospectively reviewed nine patients with complex foot and ankle arthrodeses using a tantalum spacer. Minimum followup was 1.9 years (average, 2 years; range, 1.9–2.4 years). Bone ingrowth into the tantalum was analyzed with micro-CT in three of the nine patients. All arthrodeses were fused clinically and radiographically at the 1- and 2 year followups and no complications occurred. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score increased from 32 to 74. The micro-CT showed bony trabeculae growing onto the tantalum. Our data suggest tantalum may be used as a structural graft option for ankle and subtalar arthrodesis. All nine of our patients achieved fusion and had no complications. Using tantalum obviated the need for harvesting of the iliac spine.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1A–B
Fig. 2A–C
Fig. 3A–B
Fig. 4A–B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alman BA, Craig C, Zimbler S. Subtalar arthrodesis for stabilization of valgus hindfoot in patients with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993;13:634–641.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Black J. Biological performance of tantalum. Clin Mater. 1994;16:167–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bobyn JD, Poggie RA, Krygier JJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Lewis RJ, Unger AS, O’Keefe TJ, Christie MJ, Nasser S, Wood JE, Stulberg SD, Tanzer M. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(suppl 2):123–129.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:907–914.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bobyn JD, Toh KK, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:347–354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouchard M, Barker LG, Claridge RJ. Technique tip: tantalum: a structural bone graft option for foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:39–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourelle S, Cottalorda J, Gautheron V, Chavrier Y. Extra-articular subtalar arthrodesis: a long-term follow-up in patients with cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:737–742.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boutroy S, Bouxsein ML, Munoz F, Delmas PD. In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:6508–6515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buie HR, Campbell GM, Klinck RJ, MacNeil JA, Boyd SK. Automatic segmentation of cortical and trabecular compartments based on a dual threshold technique for in vivo micro-CT bone analysis. Bone. 2007;41:505–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell GM, Buie HR, Boyd SK. Signs of irreversible architectural changes occur early in the development of experimental osteoporosis as assessed by in vivo micro-CT. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:1409–1419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carlsson A. Unsuccessful use of a titanium mesh cage in ankle arthrodesis: a report on three cases operated on due to a failed ankle replacement. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;47:337–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlsson AS, Montgomery F, Besjakov J. Arthrodesis of the ankle secondary to replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:240–245.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen YJ, Huang TJ, Hsu KY, Hsu RW, Chen CW. Subtalar distractional realignment arthrodesis with wedge bone grafting and lateral decompression for calcaneal malunion. J Trauma. 1998;45:729–737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Christie MJ. Clinical applications of trabecular metal. Am J Orthop. 2002;31:219–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Culpan P, Le Strat V, Piriou P, Judet T. Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1178–1183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Delawi D, Dhert WJ, Castelein RM, Verbout AJ, Oner FC. The incidence of donor site pain after bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest may be overestimated: a study on spine fracture patients. Spine. 2007;32:1865–1868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandez-Fairen M, Sala P, Dufoo M Jr, Ballester J, Murcia A, Merzthal L. Anterior cervical fusion with tantalum implant: a prospective randomized controlled study. Spine. 2008;33:465–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gruen TA, Poggie RA, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Lewis RJ, O’Keefe TJ, Stulberg SD, Sutherland CJ. Radiographic evaluation of a monoblock acetabular component: a multicenter study with 2- to 5-year results. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:369–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heary RF, Schlenk RP, Sacchieri TA, Barone D, Brotea C. Persistent iliac crest donor site pain: independent outcome assessment. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:510–516; discussion 516–517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hopgood P, Kumar R, Wood PL. Ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1031–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  23. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection - Users’ Edition 60. Munich, Germany: Elsevier; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jager M, Westhoff B, Wild A, Krauspe R. [Bone harvesting from the iliac crest] [in German]. Orthopade. 2005;34:976–982, 984, 986–990, 992–994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kato H, Nakamura T, Nishiguchi S, Matsusue Y, Kobayashi M, Miyazaki T, Kim HM, Kokubo T. Bonding of alkali- and heat-treated tantalum implants to bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:28–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitaoka HB, Alexander I, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349–353.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kotnis R, Pasapula C, Anwar F, Cooke PH, Sharp RJ. The management of failed ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1039–1047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Levi AD, Choi WG, Keller PJ, Heiserman JE, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine. Spine. 1998;23:1245–1250; discussion 1251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Levine B, Sporer S, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Paprosky W. Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg. 2007;20:185–194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4671–4681.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mallon WJ, Nunley JA. The Grice procedure: extra-articular subtalar arthrodesis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:649–654.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Maria V, Dimitrios D. Treatment of the progressive neuromuscular planovalgus foot deformity with the combined Batchelor-Grice procedure. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2008;17:183–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin GJ, Haid R, MacMillan M. Anterior cervical discectomy with freeze-dried fibular allograft: overview of 317 cases and literature review. Spine. 1999;24:853–859.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Matsuno H, Yokoyama A, Watari F, Uo M, Kawasaki T. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1253–1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McConnell JR, Freeman BJ, Debnath UK, Grevitt MP, Prince HG, Webb JK. A prospective randomized comparison of coralline hydroxyapatite with autograft in cervical interbody fusion. Spine. 2003;28:317–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nehme A, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:201–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Niedhart C, Pingsmann A, Jurgens C, Marr A, Blatt R, Niethard FU. [Complications after harvesting of autologous bone from the ventral and dorsal iliac crest: a prospective, controlled study] [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003;141:481–486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pollard JD, Schuberth J. Posterior bone block distraction arthrodesis of the subtalar joint: a review of 22 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;47:191–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Radnay CS, Scuderi GR. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Samartzis D, Shen F, Goldberg EG. Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation? Spine. 2005;30:1756–1761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sasso RC, LeHuec JC, Shaffrey C. Spine Interbody Research Group. Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective patient satisfaction outcome assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(suppl):S77–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schill S. Ankle arthrodesis with interposition graft as a salvage procedure after failed total ankle replacement. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007;19:547–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shapiro S, Connolly P, Donnaldson J. Cadaveric fibula, locking plate, and allogenic bone matrix for anterior cervical fusions afer cervical discectomy for radiculopathy or myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(suppl 1):43–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD, Brislin BT, Leland JM, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine. 2003;28:134–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stiehl JB. Trabecular metal in hip reconstructive surgery. Orthopedics. 2005;28:662–670.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stulberg SD. Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: graft options and adjuncts. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3 suppl 1):48–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Suchomel P, Barsa P, Buchvald P. Autologous versus allogenic bone grafts in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective study with respect to bone union pattern. Eur Spine. 2004;13:510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Thomason K, Eyres K. A technique of fusion for failed total replacement of the ankle: tibio-allograft-calcaneal fusion with a locked retrograde nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:885–888.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Trnka HJ, Easley ME, Lam PW, Anderson CD, Schon LC, Myerson MS. Subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:849–854.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang JC, Yu WD, Sandhu HS, Tam V, Delamarter RB. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1998;23:1684–1688.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang X, Masse DB, Leng H, Hess KP, Ross RD, Roeder RK, Niebur GL. Detection of trabecular bone microdamage by micro-computed tomography. J Biomech. 2007;40:3397–3403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wedemeyer C, Xu J, Neuerburg C, Landgraeber S, Malyar NM, von Knoch F, Gosheger G, von Knoch M, Loer F, Saxler G. Particle-induced osteolysis in three-dimensional micro-computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int. 2007;81:394–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wigfield C, Robertson J, Gill S, Nelson R. Clinical experience with porous tantalum cervical interbody implants in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Br J Neurosurg. 2003;17:418–425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR. Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5-11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine. 2005;30:2138–2144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zardiackas LD, Parsell DE, Dillon LD, Mitchell DW, Nunnery LA, Poggie R. Structure, metallurgy, and mechanical properties of a porous tantalum foam. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58:180–187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zwipp H, Grass R. Ankle arthrodesis after failed joint replacement. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005;17:518–533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zwipp H, Rammelt S. [Subtalar arthrodesis with calcaneal osteotomy] [in German]. Orthopade. 2006;35:387–398, 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Iain Russell for following and providing cases.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

    Arno Frigg MD & Hugh Dougall MD

  2. Human Performance Laboratory, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

    Steve Boyd PhD & Benno Nigg PhD

  3. University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland

    Arno Frigg MD

Authors
  1. Arno Frigg MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hugh Dougall MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steve Boyd PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Benno Nigg PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arno Frigg MD.

Additional information

One of more of the authors has received funding from the Swiss National Research Foundation (SNF) (AF), the Swiss Orthopaedic Society (SGO) (AF), and the Lichtenstein and Academic Society of the University of Basel, Switzerland (AF).

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Frigg, A., Dougall, H., Boyd, S. et al. Can Porous Tantalum Be Used to Achieve Ankle and Subtalar Arthrodesis?: A Pilot Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 209–216 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0948-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0948-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation