Skip to main content
Log in

Tibial Torsion in Cerebral Palsy: Validity and Reliability of Measurement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Physical examinations of tibial torsion are used for preoperative planning and to assess outcomes of tibial osteomy in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). The thigh-foot angle (TFA) and transmalleolar axis (TMA) are commonly used, and the second toe test recently was introduced. However, the validity and reliability of the three methods have not been clarified. This study was performed to evaluate the validity and reliability of these physical measures. We recruited 18 patients (36 limbs) with CP. During reliability sessions, three raters with various levels of orthopaedic experience independently measured tibial torsion using the three different methods during one day before surgery. Validity was assessed by performing a correlation study between physical examination and two-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) findings. Interobserver reliability was greatest for the TMA followed by TFA and then by the second toe test with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.92, 0.74, and 0.57, respectively. In terms of the concurrent validity, the correlation coefficients (r) for the CT measurements were 0.62, 0.52, and 0.55. When depicting tibial torsion by physical examination, all three methods had substantial validity, but test reliability and validity were highest for TMA measurements.

Level of Evidence: Level I, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A–C
Fig. 4
Fig. 5A–C

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331–1335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler-Manuel PA, Guy RL, Heatley FW. Measurement of tibial torsion: a new technique applicable to ultrasound and computed tomography. Br J Radiol. 1992;65:119–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clementz BG, Magnusson A. Assessment of tibial torsion employing fluoroscopy, computed tomography and the cryosectioning technique. Acta Radiol. 1989;30:75–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dias LS, Jasty MJ, Collins P. Rotational deformities of the lower limb in myelomeningocele. Evaluation and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:215–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dodgin DA, De Swart RJ, Stefko RM, Wenger DR, Ko JY. Distal tibial/fibular derotation osteotomy for correction of tibial torsion: review of technique and results in 63 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:95–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunteman RC, Vankoski SJ, Dias LS. Internal derotation osteotomy of the tibia: pre- and postoperative gait analysis in persons with high sacral myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20:623–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eckhoff DG, Johnson KK. Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of tibial torsion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;302:42–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1981:218.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gage J. The Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy. London, England: Mac Keith Press; 2004:363.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hudson D, Royer T, Richards J. Ultrasound measurements of torsions in the tibia and femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:138–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jakob RP, Haertel M, Stussi E. Tibial torsion calculated by computerised tomography and compared to other methods of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62:238–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jend HH, Heller M, Dallek M, Schoettle H. Measurement of tibial torsion by computer tomography. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1981;22:271–276.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laasonen EM, Jokio P, Lindholm TS. Tibial torsion measured by computed tomography. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1984;25:325–329.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. le Damany PG. Technique of tibial tropometry. 1903. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;302:4–10; discussion 2–3.

  15. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods. 1996;1:30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Milner CE, Soames RW. A comparison of four in vivo methods of measuring tibial torsion. J Anat. 1998;193:139–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider B, Laubenberger J, Jemlich S, Groene K, Weber HM, Langer M. Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:575–579.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schneider B, Laubenberger J, Wildner M, Exne V, Langer M. NMR tomographic measurement of femoral ante-torsion and tibial torsion [in German]. Rofo. 1995;162:229–231.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Selber P, Filho ER, Dallalana R, Pirpiris M, Nattrass GR, Graham HK. Supramalleolar derotation osteotomy of the tibia, with T plate fixation: technique and results in patients with neuromuscular disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:1170–1175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Staheli LT. In-toeing and out-toeing in children. J Fam Pract. 1983;16:1005–1011.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Staheli LT, Corbett M, Wyss C, King H. Lower-extremity rotational problems in children: normal values to guide management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:39–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stefko RM, de Swart RJ, Dodgin DA, Wyatt MP, Kaufman KR, Sutherland DH, Chambers HG. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of distal derotational osteotomy of the leg in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:81–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stuberg W, Temme J, Kaplan P, Clarke A, Fuchs R. Measurement of tibial torsion and thigh-foot angle using goniometry and computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;272:208–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tamari K, Tinley P, Briffa K, Breidahl W. Validity and reliability of existing and modified clinical methods of measuring femoral and tibiofibular torsion in healthy subjects: use of different reference axes may improve reliability. Clin Anat. 2005;18:46–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Widjaja PM, Ermers JW, Sijbrandij S, Damsma H, Klinkhamer AC. Technique of torsion measurement of the lower extremity using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985;9:466–470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank SungJu Kim for statistical advice and Mi Seon Ryu for assistance in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moon Seok Park MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.H., Chung, C.Y., Park, M.S. et al. Tibial Torsion in Cerebral Palsy: Validity and Reliability of Measurement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 2098–2104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0705-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0705-1

Keywords

Navigation