Skip to main content
Log in

Can the Volume of Pelvic Osteolysis be Calculated without Using Computed Tomography?

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

The most common method to diagnose and monitor osteolysis is the standard anteroposterior radiograph. Unfortunately, plain radiographs underestimate the incidence and extent of osteolysis. CT scans are more sensitive and accurate but also more expensive and subject patients to more radiation. To determine whether the volume of pelvic osteolysis could be accurately estimated without a CT scan, we evaluated the relationships between CT volume measurements and other variables that may be related to the size of pelvic osteolytic lesions in 78 THAs. Only the area of pelvic osteolysis measured on radiographs, heavy patient activity level, and total volume of wear were associated with the pelvic osteolysis volume measured on CT in the context of the multivariate regression analysis. Despite a strong correlation (r = 0.93, r2 = 0.87) between these three variables and the volume of pelvic osteolysis measured on CT, estimates of pelvic osteolysis volume deviated from the actual volume measured on CT by more than 10 cm3 among eight of the 78 THAs in this study. CT images remain our preferred modality when accurate assessments of pelvic osteolysis volume are required.

Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry DJ. Periprosthetic fractures associated with osteolysis: a problem on the rise. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3 Suppl 1):107–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Cabanela ME. Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1692–1702.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chatoo M, Parfitt J, Pearse MF. Periprosthetic acetabular fracture associated with extensive osteolysis. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:843–845.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Claus AM, Engh CA Jr, Sychterz CJ, Xenos JS, Orishimo KF, Engh CA Sr. Radiographic definition of pelvic osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1519–1526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dowd JE, Sychterz CJ, Young AM, Engh CA. Characterization of long-term femoral-head-penetration rates: association with and prediction of osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1102–1107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-coated femoral components. Clin. Orthop Relat Res. 1990;257:107–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Engh CA Jr, Culpepper WJ 2nd, Engh CA. Long-term results of use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:177–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Engh CA Jr, Sychterz CJ, Young AM, Pollock DC, Toomey SD, Engh CA. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in radiographic assessment of osteolysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:752–759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris WH. The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;311:46–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Howie DW, Neale SD, Stamenkov R, McGee MA, Taylor DJ, Findlay DM. Progression of acetabular periprosthetic osteolytic lesions measured with computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1818–1825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hui AJ, McCalden RW, Martell JM, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Validation of two and three-dimensional radiographic techniques for measuring polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:505–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Isaac GH, Dowdson D, Wroblewski BM. An investigation into the origins of time-dependent variation in penetration rates with Charnley acetabular cups—wear, creep or degradation? Proc Inst Mech H. 1996;210:209–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitamura N, Pappedemos PC, Duffy PR 3rd, Stepniewski AS, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA. The value of anteroposterior radiographs for evaluating pelvic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:239–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leung SB, Egawa H, Stepniewski A, Beykirch S, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA Sr. Incidence and volume of pelvic osteolysis at early follow-up with highly cross-linked and noncross-linked polyethylene. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 Suppl 2):134–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Looney RJ, Boyd A, Totterman S, Seo GS, Tamez-Pena J, Campbell D, Novotny L, Olcott C, Martell J, Hayes FA, O’Keefe RJ, Schwarz EM. Volumetric computerized tomography as a measurement of periprosthetic acetabular osteolysis and its correlation with wear. Arthritis Res. 2002;4:59–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh CA. Evaluation of cementless acetabular migration. An experimental study. J Arthroplasty. 1989; 4:245–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Oparaugo PC, Clarke IC, Malchau H, Herberts P. Correlation of wear debris-induced osteolysis and revision with volumetric wear-rates of polyethylene. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:22–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Orishimo KF, Claus AM, Sychterz CJ, Engh CA. Relationship between polyethylene wear and osteolysis in hips with a second-generation porous-coated cementless cup after seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1095–1099.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perez RE, Rodriguez JA, Deshmukh RG, Ranawat CS. Polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis in metal-backed acetabular components with cylindrical liners. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH, Kohli J, Hendrix RW, Stulberg SD. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:609–614.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sánchez-Sotelo J, McGrory BJ, Berry DJ. Acute periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum associated with osteolytic pelvic lesions: a report of 3 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:126–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sheskin DJ. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures: Second Edition. Washington, DC: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stern SH, CRCPD Committee on Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends, American College of Radiology. Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT) Tabulation and Graphical Summary of 2000 Survey of Computed Tomography (CRCPD Publication #E-07-2). Frankfort, KY: Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc; 2007:1–154.

  25. Stulberg SD, Wixson RL, Adams AD, Hendrix RW, Bernfield JB. Monitoring pelvic osteolysis following total hip replacement surgery: an algorithm for surveillance. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(Supp 1):116–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Jr, Young A, Engh CA. Analysis of temporal wear patterns of porous-coated acetabular components: distinguishing between true wear and so-called bedding-in. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:821–830.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Vol. 1: Sources. New York, NY: United Nations Publishing; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cara C. Powers MD.

Additional information

The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute has received funding from Inova Health System and from a cooperative agreement awarded and administered by the US Army Medical Research & Materiel Command (USAMRMC) and the Telemedicine & Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC) to support this study. Two of the authors (CAE and CAE, Jr.) receive royalties from DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson company. One author (CAE, Jr.) serves as a consultant for DePuy and another author (CAE) owns Johnson & Johnson stock.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Egawa, H., Powers, C.C., Beykirch, S.E. et al. Can the Volume of Pelvic Osteolysis be Calculated without Using Computed Tomography?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 181–187 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0522-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0522-y

Keywords

Navigation