Abstract
The main goals of TKA are pain relief and improvement of function and range of motion (ROM). To ascertain whether TKA in patients with stiff knees would relieve pain and improve functional outcome and ROM, we asked four questions: whether (1) Knee Society and WOMAC scores would improve after TKA; (2) poor preoperative ROM would improve after TKA; (3) the revision rate of TKA in stiff knees would be high; and (4) complication rates would be high in these patients after TKA. We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients (86 knees) with stiff knees (mean age, 56.8 years) who underwent TKAs with a condylar constrained or a posterior stabilized prosthesis. The minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 9.1 years; range, 5–12 years). The mean preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score and Knee Society knee and functional scores were 42, 11, and 42 points, respectively, and postoperatively they were 84, 90, and 84 points, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative total WOMAC scores were 73 and 34 points, respectively. One knee (1.2%) had aseptic loosening of the tibial component and 12 knees (14%) had complications. Despite a relatively high rate of complications, most patients had substantial improvement in function.
Levels of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aglietti P, Windsor RE, Buzzi R, Insall JN. Arthroplasty for the stiff and ankylosed knee. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:1–5.
WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.
Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK. Comparison of total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:87–95.
Bradley GW, Freeman MA, Albrektsson BE. Total prosthetic replacement of ankylosed knees. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:179–183.
Cloutier JM, Sabouret P, Deghrar A. Total knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments: a nine to eleven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:697–702.
Gatha NM, Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Factors affecting postoperative range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2004;17:196–202.
Harvey IA, Barry K, Kirby SP, Johnson R, Elloy MA. Factors affecting the range of motion of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:950–955.
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14.
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:754–765.
Kim YH, Cho SH, Kim JS. Total knee arthroplasty in bony ankylosis in gross flexion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:296–300.
Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Total knee replacement after spontaneous osseous ankylosis and take down of formal knee fusion. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:453–460.
Kim YH, Koo HK, Kim JS. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:101–115.
Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim JS. Conversion of a fused knee with use of a posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1047–1050.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
Lizaur A, Marco L, Cebrian R. Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:626–629.
Mahomed N, McKee N, Solomon P, Lahoda L, Gross AE. Soft tissue expansion before total knee arthroplasty in arthrodesed joints: a report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:88–90.
Malkani AL, Rand JA, Bryan RS, Wallrichs SL. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis: a ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:423–431.
McAuley JP, Harrer MF, Ammeen D, Engh GA. Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:203–207.
Montgomery WH 3rd, Insall JN, Haas SB, Becker MS, Windsor RE. Primary total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees. Am J Knee Surg. 1998;11:20–23.
Morag G, Kulidjian A, Zalzal P, Shasha N, Gross AE, Backstein D. Total knee replacement in previous recipients of fresh osteochondral allograft transplants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:541–546.
Mullen JO. Range of motion following total knee arthroplasty in ankylosed joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;179:200–203.
Naranja RJ Jr, Lotke PA, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Total knee arthroplasty in a previously ankylosed or arthrodesed knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:234–237.
Nutton RW, van der Linden ML, Rowe PJ, Gaston P, Wade FA. A prospective randomized double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:37–42.
Rajgopal A, Ahuja N, Dolai B. Total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:585–590.
Ryu J, Saito S, Yamamoto K, Sano S. Factors influencing the postoperative range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1993;53:35–40.
Schurman JR 2nd, Wilde AH. Total knee replacement after spontaneous osseous ankylosis: a report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:455–459.
Spicer DD, Curry JI, Pomeroy D, Badenhausen WE Jr, Schaper LA, Suthers KE, Smith MW. Range of motion after arthroplasty for the stiff osteoarthritic knee. J South Orthop Assoc. 2002;11:227–230.
Acknowledgment
We thank Yoowang Choi, MD, clinical fellow, for collecting data for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial association (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, YH., Kim, JS. Does TKA Improve Functional Outcome and Range of Motion in Patients with Stiff Knees?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 1348–1354 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0445-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0445-7