Skip to main content
Log in

Does TKA Improve Functional Outcome and Range of Motion in Patients with Stiff Knees?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

The main goals of TKA are pain relief and improvement of function and range of motion (ROM). To ascertain whether TKA in patients with stiff knees would relieve pain and improve functional outcome and ROM, we asked four questions: whether (1) Knee Society and WOMAC scores would improve after TKA; (2) poor preoperative ROM would improve after TKA; (3) the revision rate of TKA in stiff knees would be high; and (4) complication rates would be high in these patients after TKA. We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients (86 knees) with stiff knees (mean age, 56.8 years) who underwent TKAs with a condylar constrained or a posterior stabilized prosthesis. The minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 9.1 years; range, 5–12 years). The mean preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score and Knee Society knee and functional scores were 42, 11, and 42 points, respectively, and postoperatively they were 84, 90, and 84 points, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative total WOMAC scores were 73 and 34 points, respectively. One knee (1.2%) had aseptic loosening of the tibial component and 12 knees (14%) had complications. Despite a relatively high rate of complications, most patients had substantial improvement in function.

Levels of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–F

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Windsor RE, Buzzi R, Insall JN. Arthroplasty for the stiff and ankylosed knee. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK. Comparison of total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:87–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley GW, Freeman MA, Albrektsson BE. Total prosthetic replacement of ankylosed knees. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:179–183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cloutier JM, Sabouret P, Deghrar A. Total knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments: a nine to eleven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:697–702.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gatha NM, Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Factors affecting postoperative range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2004;17:196–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harvey IA, Barry K, Kirby SP, Johnson R, Elloy MA. Factors affecting the range of motion of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:950–955.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:754–765.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim YH, Cho SH, Kim JS. Total knee arthroplasty in bony ankylosis in gross flexion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:296–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Total knee replacement after spontaneous osseous ankylosis and take down of formal knee fusion. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:453–460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YH, Koo HK, Kim JS. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:101–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim JS. Conversion of a fused knee with use of a posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1047–1050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lizaur A, Marco L, Cebrian R. Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:626–629.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahomed N, McKee N, Solomon P, Lahoda L, Gross AE. Soft tissue expansion before total knee arthroplasty in arthrodesed joints: a report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:88–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Malkani AL, Rand JA, Bryan RS, Wallrichs SL. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis: a ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:423–431.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McAuley JP, Harrer MF, Ammeen D, Engh GA. Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:203–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Montgomery WH 3rd, Insall JN, Haas SB, Becker MS, Windsor RE. Primary total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees. Am J Knee Surg. 1998;11:20–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morag G, Kulidjian A, Zalzal P, Shasha N, Gross AE, Backstein D. Total knee replacement in previous recipients of fresh osteochondral allograft transplants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:541–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mullen JO. Range of motion following total knee arthroplasty in ankylosed joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;179:200–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Naranja RJ Jr, Lotke PA, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Total knee arthroplasty in a previously ankylosed or arthrodesed knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:234–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nutton RW, van der Linden ML, Rowe PJ, Gaston P, Wade FA. A prospective randomized double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:37–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rajgopal A, Ahuja N, Dolai B. Total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:585–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryu J, Saito S, Yamamoto K, Sano S. Factors influencing the postoperative range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1993;53:35–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schurman JR 2nd, Wilde AH. Total knee replacement after spontaneous osseous ankylosis: a report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:455–459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spicer DD, Curry JI, Pomeroy D, Badenhausen WE Jr, Schaper LA, Suthers KE, Smith MW. Range of motion after arthroplasty for the stiff osteoarthritic knee. J South Orthop Assoc. 2002;11:227–230.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Yoowang Choi, MD, clinical fellow, for collecting data for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Hoo Kim MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial association (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, YH., Kim, JS. Does TKA Improve Functional Outcome and Range of Motion in Patients with Stiff Knees?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 1348–1354 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0445-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0445-7

Keywords

Navigation