Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Intramedullary and Juxtacortical Low-grade Osteogenic Sarcoma

  • Symposium: Selected Papers Presented at the 2007 Meeting of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

While low-grade juxtacortical and low-grade intramedullary osteogenic sarcomas are histologically indistinguishable, they have been studied as separate entities. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, radiographic, histologic features and treatment of 59 patients treated surgically to compare the rate of local recurrence, grade progression, and survival between low-grade intramedullary and low-grade juxtacortical osteogenic sarcoma. Forty-five (76%) patients were treated for low-grade juxtacortical osteogenic sarcoma and 14 (24%) were treated for low-grade intramedullary osteogenic sarcoma. Local recurrence rates of 7% were similar for both groups studied. The rate of distant metastases was also similar for both groups. . The rate of dedifferentiation for the entire group was 29%. Dedifferentiated lesions were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in 16 of 17 cases. Recurrence preceded dedifferentiation in four cases. Five-year survival was over 90% in both groups. Low-grade intramedullary and low-grade juxtacortical osteogenic sarcoma were clinically indistinguishable with identical rates of local recurrence, distant metastases, dedifferentiation, and survival.

Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antonescu CR, Huvos AG. Low-grade osteogenic sarcoma arising in medullary and surface osseous locations. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114 Suppl:S90–103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Staals EL, Davidovitz P. Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma: the experience of the Rizzoli Institute. Cancer. 2005;103:2373–2382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campanacci M, Picci P, Gherlinzoni F, Guerra A, Bertoni F, Neff JR. Parosteal osteosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:313–321.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Choong PF, Pritchard DJ, Rock MG, Sim FH, McLeod RA, Unni KK. Low grade central osteogenic sarcoma. A long-term followup of 20 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:198–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kavanagh TG, Cannon SR, Pringle J, Stoker DJ, Kemp HB. Parosteal osteosarcoma. Treatment by wide resection and prosthetic replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:959–965.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Manoso MW, Healey JH, Boland PJ, Athanasian EA, Maki RG, Huvos AG, Morris CD. De novo osteogenic sarcoma in patients older than forty: benefit of multimodality therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:110–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyers PA, Heller G, Healey J, Huvos A, Lane J, Marcove R, Applewhite A, Vlamis V, Rosen G. Chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:5–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Okada K, Frassica FJ, Sim FH, Beabout JW, Bond JR, Unni KK. Parosteal osteosarcoma. A clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:366–378.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheth DS, Yasko AW, Raymond AK, et al. Conventional and dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Cancer. 1996;78:2136–2145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Szymanska J, Mandahl N, Mertens F, Tarkkanen M, Karaharju E, Knuutila S. Ring chromosomes in parosteal osteosarcoma contain sequences from 12q13–15: a combined cytogenetic and comparative genomic hybridization study. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1996;16:31–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tarkkanen M, Böhling T, Gamberi G, Ragazzini P, Benassi MS, Kivioja A, Kallio P, Elomaa I, Picci P, Knuutila S. Comparative genomic hybridization of low-grade central osteosarcoma. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:421–426.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Temple HT, Scully SP, O’Keefe RJ, Katapurum S, Mankin HJ. Clinical outcome of 38 patients with juxtacortical osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;373:208–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wold LE, Unni KK, Beabout JW, Sim FH, Dahlin DC. Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:53–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol D. Morris MD, MS.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution either has waived or does not require approval for the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Schwab, J.H., Antonescu, C.R., Athanasian, E.A. et al. A Comparison of Intramedullary and Juxtacortical Low-grade Osteogenic Sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466, 1318–1322 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0251-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0251-2

Keywords

Navigation