Skip to main content
Log in

Do Patient Expectations of Spinal Surgery Relate to Functional Outcome?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

It is important for surgeons to understand patients’ expectations for surgery. We asked whether patient factors and preoperative functional outcome scores reflect the degree of expectations patients have for posterior spinal surgery. Second, we asked whether patients’ expectations for surgery predict improvements in functional outcome scores after surgery. We prospectively enrolled 155 consecutive surgical patients with greater than 90% followup. Patients’ expectations were evaluated preoperatively along with SF-36 and Oswestry disability questionnaires. Postoperatively (6 months for decompression; 1 year for fusions), we quantified patient-derived satisfaction regarding whether expectations were met and by patient-derived functional outcome scores. In patients undergoing decompression, gender, SF-36 general health domain, and SF-36 physical component score predicted patients with high expectations for surgery. Patients with high expectations also reported greater postoperative improvements in SF-36 role physical domain scores after surgery. Expectations for surgery were met in 81% of patients. In a subset of patients (21 of 143), expectations were not met. These patients reported lower mean preoperative SF-36 general health, vitality, and mean mental component scores.

Level of Evidence: Level I, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Trief PM, Ploutz-Snyder R, Freund D. Psychological attributes of preoperative total joint replacement patients: implications for optimal physical outcome. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(7 suppl 2):125–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–1251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Howell E, Kreif S. An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:285–290.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gepstein R, Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Folman Y. Decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:427–431.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G. Surgery for lumbar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD001350.

  6. Gibson JN, Waddell G, Grant IC. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD001352.

  7. Häkkinen A, Kautiainen H, Järvenpää S, Arkela-Kautiainen M, Ylinen J. Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:347–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hopman WM, Towheed T, Anastassiades T, Tenenhouse A, Poliquin S, Berger C, Joseph L, Brown JP, Murray TM, Adachi JD, Hanley DA, Papadimitroupolos E. Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group. CMAJ. 2000;163:265–271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutson MM, Blaha JD. Patients’ recall of preoperative instruction for informed consent for an operation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:160–162.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Iversen MD, Daltroy LH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;34:169–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson JL, Kroenke K. The effect of unmet expectations among adults presenting with physical symptoms. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(9 pt 2):889–897.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jönsson B, Annertz M, Sjöberg C, Strömqvist B. A prospective, consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine. 1997;22:2938–2944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Brick GW, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN, Fossel AH, Lew RA, Liang MH. Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995;20:1155–1160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:92–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN. Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1999;24:2229–2233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin CT, Albertson GA, Schilling LM, Cyran EM, Anderson SN, Ware L, Anderson RJ. Is patients’ perception of time spent with the physician a determinant of ambulatory patient satisfaction? Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1437–1442.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1273–1279.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rönnberg K, Lind B, Zoëga B, Halldin K, Gellerstedt M, Brisby H. Patients’ satisfaction with provided care/information and expectations on clinical outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery. Spine. 2007;32:256–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shabat S, Folman Y, Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Catz A, Gepstein R. Gender differences as an influence on patients’ satisfaction rates in spinal surgery of elderly patients. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:1027–1032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Toyone T, Tanaka T, Kato D, Kaneyama R, Otsuka M. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction in lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2005;30:2689–2694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Turner P, Williams C. Informed consent: patients listen and read, but what information do they retain? N Z Med J. 2002;115:U218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamashita K, Hayashi J, Ohzono K, Hiroshima K. Correlation of patient satisfaction with symptom severity and walking ability after surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2003;28:2477–2481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the contributions of Christine Le, Emi Do, Dawn Barbieri, Dr. Mubarak Al-gahtany, and Lynn Antwi-Boasiako to this study, and we thank Dr. Marjan Vidmar for assistance with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Yee MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Yee, A., Adjei, N., Do, J. et al. Do Patient Expectations of Spinal Surgery Relate to Functional Outcome?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466, 1154–1161 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0194-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0194-7

Keywords

Navigation