Skip to main content
Log in

The Width:thickness Ratio of the Patella

An Aid in Knee Arthroplasty

  • Original Article
  • Knee
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

Establishing the appropriate size of the patellar implant-bone composite is one of the important steps ensuring functional success in arthroplasty. Conventionally, the patella is measured intraoperatively and its thickness is used to guide the depth of resection. However, in a diseased joint, this may not reflect the native patellar thickness. We studied the relationship between the patellar thickness and various patellar dimensions on three-dimensional reconstructed computed tomographic scans from 37 normal adult knees. Patellar width correlated with thickness. The average patellar width:thickness ratio was 2.0 (standard deviation, 0.106; 95% confidence interval, 1.96–2.03). The cartilage thickness was on average 2.5 mm (standard deviation, 1.0). The width:thickness ratio was similar in 79 digital radiographs taken before TKA of knees without patellofemoral disease (mean, 2.1; standard deviation, 0.28). When compared with the two other methods for calculating patellar resection described in the literature, the width:thickness ratio was more reliable. The width:thickness ratio appears anatomically constant and may be a useful guide for estimating premorbid patellar thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–H
Fig. 2A–D
Fig. 3A–D
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baldwin JL, House CK. Anatomic dimensions of the patella measured during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:250–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bengs BC, Scott RD. The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:650–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen ZA, Mow VC, Henry JH, Levine WN, Ateshian GA. Templates of the cartilage layers of the patellofemoral joint and their use in the assessment of osteoarthritic cartilage damage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11:569–579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzpatrick C, FitzPatrick D, Lee J, Auger D. Statistical analysis of patellar resurfacing in Caucasian and Japanese subjects. J Biomech. 2006;39(suppl 1):519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenfield MA, Insall JN, Case GC, Kelly MA. Instrumentation of the patellar osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty: the relationship of patellar thickness and lateral retinacular release. Am J Knee Surg. 1996;9:129–131; discussion 131–132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy PA, Nammalwar P, Kuo S. Measuring the thickness of articular cartilage from MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:120–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Baena FM, Barrett AR, Cobb JP. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement: the Imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1513–1518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu HC, Luo ZP, Rand JA, An KN. Influence of patellar thickness on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:69–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Insall JN. Surgical techniques, instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, ed. Surgery of the Knee. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1993:767–768.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang CC, Chen CH, Huang LT, Liu YJ, Chang SL, Wen CY, Liu TK. Effect of patellar thickness on kinematics of the knee joint. J Formos Med Assoc. 1993;92:373–378.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamraski G, Monsaert A, De Maeseneer M, Haentjens P. Reliability and validity of plain radiographs to assess angulation of small finger metacarpal neck fractures: human cadaveric study. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:37–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ledger M, Shakespeare D, Scaddan M. Accuracy of patellar resection in total knee replacement: a study using the medial pivot knee. Knee. 2005;12:13–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee TQ, Kim WC. Anatomically based patellar resection criteria for total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg. 1998;11:161–165.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lie DT, Gloria N, Amis AA, Lee BP, Yeo SJ, Chou SM. Patellar resection during total knee arthroplasty: effect on bone strain and fracture risk. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:203–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Maitino PD, Herrington SM, Kefauver CA. Freehand resection of the patella in total knee arthroplasty referencing the attachments of the quadriceps tendon and patellar tendon. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:788–792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meachim G, Bentley G, Baker R. Effect of age on thickness of adult patellar articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis. 1977;36:563–568.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pynsent PB. Choosing an outcome measure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:792–794.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rand JA. Total knee arthroplasty: techniques. In: Morrey BF, ed. Joint Replacement Arthroplasty. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1991:1002–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reuben JD, McDonald CL, Woodard PL, Hennington LJ. Effect of patella thickness on patella strain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:251–258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rooney N, Fitzpatrick DP, Beverland DE. Intraoperative knee anthropometrics: correlation with cartilage wear. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006;220:671–675.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Star MJ, Kaufman KR, Irby SE, Colwell CW Jr. The effects of patellar thickness on patellofemoral forces after resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:279–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Robin Richards for technical support and designing the three-dimensional image analysis software that was used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farhad Iranpour MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Iranpour, F., Merican, A.M., Amis, A.A. et al. The Width:thickness Ratio of the Patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466, 1198–1203 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0130-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0130-x

Keywords

Navigation