Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Pragmatic Approach to Ethical Decision-Making in Engineering Practice: Characteristics, Evaluation Criteria, and Implications for Instruction and Assessment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper begins by reviewing dominant themes in current teaching of professional ethics in engineering education. In contrast to more traditional approaches that simulate ethical practice by using ethical theories to reason through micro-level ethical dilemmas, this paper proposes a pragmatic approach to ethics that places more emphasis on the practical plausibility of ethical decision-making. In addition to the quality of ethical justification, the value of a moral action also depends on its effectiveness in solving an ethical dilemma, cultivating healthy working relationships, negotiating existing organizational cultures, and achieving contextual plausibility in everyday professional practice. This paper uses a cross-cultural ethics scenario to further elaborate how a pragmatic approach can help us rethink ethical reasoning, as well as ethics instruction and assessment. This paper is expected to be of interest to educators eager to improve the ability of engineers and other professional students to effectively and appropriately deal with the kinds of everyday ethical issues they will likely face in their careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For instance, Vesilind and Gunn’s book Engineering, Ethics, and the Environment (1998) considers “applying” classical ethical theories as a way for engineers to practice environmental ethics. A few other examples that propose applying classical ethical theories include Mitcham and Duval’s book Engineering Ethics (1999) and Catalano’s book Engineering Ethics: Peace, Justice, and the Earth (Second Edition) (2014).

  2. The three dimensions were derived from a separate study that compared expert and novice responses to these cross-cultural engineering ethics scenarios. Results from this study will be reported in a separate paper.

  3. Examples include cultural tools in organizational and local contexts.

References

  • Anderson, E. (2014). Dewey’s moral philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 ed.). Retrieved March 21, 2016, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/dewey-moral/.

  • Bowen, W. R. (2014). Engineering ethics: Challenges and opportunities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2012). Jishu zhexue yinlun [An introduction to the philosophy of technology]. Beijing: Kexue chubanshe [Science Press].

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, E., & Zandvoort, H. (2011). Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: Beyond the individualistic approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emison, G. A. (2004). American pragmatism as a guide for professional ethical conduct for engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiki, A. (2012). How should we accept the American-style engineering ethics? In Q. Wang (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on applied ethics and applied philosophy in East Asia (pp. 47–60). Dalian, China: Dalian University of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D. (2014). Confucianism: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E. (2008). The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M., Rabins, M. J., James, R., & Englehardt, E. (2014). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, T. (1997). Parallels between teaching ethics and teaching engineering. Retrieved March 21, 2016, from https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/more/technology-ethics/resources/teaching-ethics-and-teaching-engineering/.

  • Herkert, J. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, R. D. (2015). US engineering ethics and its connections to international activity. In C. Murphy, P. Gardoni, H. Bashir, C. E. Harris Jr., & E. Masad (Eds.), Engineering ethics for a globalized world (pp. 55–67). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jesiek, B., Zhu, Q., Woo, S., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 8(1). Retrieved March 20, 2016, from http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol8/iss1/1/.

  • Jonassen, D. H., Shen, D., Marra, R. M., Cho, Y., LO, J. L., & Lohani, V. K. (2009). Engaging and supporting problem solving in engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King-Metters, K., & Metters, R. (2008) Misunderstanding the Chinese worker. The Wall Street Journal, p. R11. Retrieved March 21, 2016, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121441282707703883.

  • Kline, R. (2001/2002). Using history and sociology to teach engineering ethics. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(4), 13–20.

  • LaFollette, H. (2007). The practice of ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, F. Y. Y., Ang, A. M. H., & Lim, S. S. Y. (2007). Encounters between foreigners and Chinese: Perception and management of cultural differences. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 14(6), 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena, J., Mitcham, C., Leydens, J., Munakata-Marr, J., Starker, J., & Simoes, M. (2007). Theory and practice of humanitarian ethics in graduate engineering education. In Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from https://peer.asee.org/2311.

  • Luegenbiehl, H. C. (2003). Teaching engineering ethics across national borders. In Paper presented at 2003 annual conference & exposition, Nashville, Tennessee. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from https://peer.asee.org/teaching-engineering-ethics-across-national-borders.pdf.

  • Luegenbiehl, H. C. (2010). Ethical principles for engineering in a global environment. In I. van de Poel & D. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 147–160). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, W. (1997). Teaching engineering ethics in the United States. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 16(4), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, W., & Kline, R. (2000). Engineering practice and engineering ethics. Science Technology Human Values, 25(2), 195–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, M. S. (2001). Responsible engineering: The importance of character and imagination. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT and schema theory. Educational Psychological Review, 11(4), 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. B., & Buchholz, R. A. (2000). Rethinking business ethics: A pragmatic approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra, J. P. (2009). What is and what should pragmatic ethics be? Some remarks on recent scholarship. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 2(2), 100–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, W. (2008). Philosophy of technology and macro-ethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Hofstede Center. (2015). China. Retrieved December 20, 2015, from http://geert-hofstede.com/china.html.

  • van de Poel, I., & Royakkers, L. (2011). Ethics, technology, and engineering: An introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., & Thompson, R. G. (2013). Incorporating global components into ethics education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. H. (2012). Dao, harmony and personhood: Towards a Confucian ethics of technology. Philosophy Technology, 25(1), 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments which significantly improved the quality of this paper. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 17th International Conference on Ethics Across the Curriculum in Greenville, South Carolina, October 8–10, 2015. These materials are based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1160455. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ethics Across Campus Program, Division of Liberal Arts and International Studies, Colorado School of Mines, 322 Stratton Hall, 1005 14th Street, Golden, CO, 80401, USA

    Qin Zhu

  2. School of Engineering Education, Purdue University, 1313 Armstrong Hall, 701 West Stadium Avenue, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2045, USA

    Brent K. Jesiek

Authors
  1. Qin Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brent K. Jesiek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qin Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Q., Jesiek, B.K. A Pragmatic Approach to Ethical Decision-Making in Engineering Practice: Characteristics, Evaluation Criteria, and Implications for Instruction and Assessment. Sci Eng Ethics 23, 663–679 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9826-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9826-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation