Skip to main content
Log in

Science and Socially Responsible Freedom

Commentary on “Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges”

  • Comment
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bostrom, N., & Sandberg, A. (2009). Cognitive enhancement: Methods, ethics, regulatory challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics (this issue).

  • Feinberg, J. (1973). Social philosophy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture and credibility. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocklmayer, S. M., Gore, M. M., & Bryant, C. (2001). Science communication in theory and practice. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Askland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Askland, A. Science and Socially Responsible Freedom. Sci Eng Ethics 15, 343–349 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9132-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9132-7

Keywords

Navigation