Skip to main content
Log in

Global challenges as inspiration: A classroom strategy to foster social responsibility

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social responsibility is at the heart of the Engineer’s Creed embodied in the pledge that we will “dedicate [our] professional knowledge and skill to the advancement and betterment of human welfare...[placing] public welfare above all other considerations.” However, half century after the original creed was written, we find ourselves in a world with great technological advances and great global-scale technologically-enabled peril. These issues can be naturally integrated into the engineering curriculum in a way that enhances the development of the technological skill set. We have found that these global challenges create a natural opportunity to foster social responsibility within the engineering students whom we educate. In freshman through senior-level materials engineering courses, we used five guiding principles to shape several different classroom activities and assignments. Upon testing an initial cohort of 28 students had classroom experiences based on these five principles, we saw a shift in attitude: before the experience, 18% of the cohort viewed engineers as playing an active role in solving global problems; after the experiences, 79% recognized the engineer’s role in solving global-scale problems. In this paper, we present how global issues can be used to stimulate thinking for socially-responsible engineering solutions. We set forth five guiding principles that can foster the mindset for socially responsible actions along with examples of how these principles translate into classroom activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Society of Professional Engineers, “Code of Ethics for Engineering: Engineer’s Creed,” www.nspe.org/ethics/.

  2. Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Speicher, B. et al. (1987) The Measurement of Moral Judgment, vol. 1 & vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wackernagel, M., N.B. Schulz, D. Deumling, A. Callejas Linares, M. Jenkins, V. Kapos, C. Monfreda, J. Loh, N. Myers, R. Nargaard, and J. Randers (2002) “Tracking the Ecological Overshoot of the Human Economy,” Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences 99: 9266–9271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodstein, David (2004) Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil, W.W. Norton and Company, New York, NY, p.128.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd, D.R. (2001) Canada vs. the OECD: An Environmental Comparison, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future, The Talloires Declaration (Washington, DC, 1990) available on-line at www.ulsf.org/programs_talloires_td.html.

  7. Orr, D.W. (1994) Earth in Mind: On Education, Environment, and the Human Prospect, Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Capra, F. (2002) The Hidden Connections: A Science for Sustainable Living, Anchor Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, V. and L. Johnson (1997) Systems Thinking Basics: From Concepts to Causal Loops, Pegasus Communications, Inc., Waltham, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richmond, B. (1993) “Systems thinking: critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond,” Systems Dynamics Review 9: 113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For example, see J. Puckett, L. Byster, S. Westervelt, R. Gutierrez, S. Davis, A. Hussain and M. Dutta (2004) Exporting Harm: The High-Tech Trashing of Asia, The Basel Action Network and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, p. 3. (available at www.svtc.org/cleancc/pubs/technotrash.html)

  12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Research and Development, Life Cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principals. (1993): EPA/600/R-92/245.

  13. Anastas, P. and J. Zimmerman (March 1, 2003) “Designing Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering,” Environmental Science and Technology, 95A–101A.

  14. Janine M. Benyus (1997) Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature, Perennial.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Linda Vanasupa or Lynn Slivovsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanasupa, L., Chen, K.C. & Slivovsky, L. Global challenges as inspiration: A classroom strategy to foster social responsibility. SCI ENG ETHICS 12, 373–380 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0036-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0036-5

Keywords

Navigation