Skip to main content
Log in

Eight-dimensional methodology for innovative thinking about the case and ethics of the mount graham, large binocular telescope project

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces the Eight Dimensional Methodology for Innovative Thinking (the Eight Dimensional Methodology), for innovative problem solving, as a unified approach to case analysis that builds on comprehensive problem solving knowledge from industry, business, marketing, math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and daily life. It is designed to stimulate innovation by quickly generating unique “out of the box” unexpected and high quality solutions. It gives new insights and thinking strategies to solve everyday problems faced in the workplace, by helping decision makers to see otherwise obscure alternatives and solutions.

Daniel Raviv, the engineer who developed the Eight Dimensional Methodology, and paper co-author, technology ethicist Rosalyn Berne, suggest that this tool can be especially useful in identifying solutions and alternatives for particular problems of engineering, and for the ethical challenges which arise with them. First, the Eight Dimensional Methodology helps to elucidate how what may appear to be a basic engineering problem also has ethical dimensions. In addition, it offers to the engineer a methodology for penetrating and seeing new dimensions of those problems.

To demonstrate the effectiveness of the Eight Dimensional Methodology as an analytical tool for thinking about ethical challenges to engineering, the paper presents the case of the construction of the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) on Mount Graham in Arizona. Analysis of the case offers to decision makers the use of the Eight Dimensional Methodology in considering alternative solutions for how they can proceed in their goals of exploring space. It then follows that same process through the second stage of exploring the ethics of each of those different solutions.

The LBT project pools resources from an international partnership of universities and research institutes for the construction and maintenance of a highly sophisticated, powerful new telescope. It will soon mark the erection of the world’s largest and most powerful optical telescope, designed to see fine detail otherwise visible only from space. It also represents a controversial engineering project that is being undertaken on land considered to be sacred by the local, native Apache people. As presented, the case features the University of Virginia, and its challenges in consideration of whether and how to join the LBT project consortium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. “U.Va. Officials to Discuss Large Binocular Telescope Project,” University of Virginia News, April 17, 2002. Found at http://www.virginia.edu/topnews/releeases2002/observe-april-1-2002.html

  2. “University of Virginia Joins Large Binocular Telescope Consortium,” in University of Virginia News, October 3, 2002. Found at http://www.virginia.edu/topnews/releases2002/telescope-oct-3-2002.html

  3. “Mount Graham Telescopes, Environmental, & Cultural Issues, in Observatories, Department of Astronomy, university of Virginia. Found at http://www.astro.virginia.edu/LBT/osu-sum.html

  4. “UVA will Invest in Controversial Telescope Project,” by Eric Swensen, The Daily Progress, December 12, 2003. Found at http://www.dailyprogress.com/news/archive/MGBP66KKLV6D.html

  5. “U.Va. Joins Arizona Telescope Consortium,” in UVA Top News Daily, October 4, 2002

  6. Raviv, D. (2002) “Eight Dimensional Methodology for Innovative Thinking”, American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), National conference, Montreal, Canada, June 2002. Raviv, D. (2002) “Do We Teach Them How to Think?” American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), National Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosalyn W. Berne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berne, R.W., Raviv, D. Eight-dimensional methodology for innovative thinking about the case and ethics of the mount graham, large binocular telescope project. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 235–242 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0019-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0019-3

Keywords

Navigation