Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transforming science curricula in higher education: Feminist contributions

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feminist contributions to the science curricula in higher education constitute invaluable but often overlooked resources for truly effective communication about science. Here I share a sampling of feminist science studies and discuss the origins of this effort to create inclusive and less biased science curricula that serve all students and citizens. Challenges from scientists center on assumptions and values about the appropriate relationship between science and politics, while challenges from educators extend to assumptions about how science has been taught. Currently, national and local curriculum transformation efforts are producing useful insights and materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosser, S.V. (1997) Re-engineering Female-Friendly Science, Teacher’s College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rossiter, M. (1995) Women Scientists in America: Before Affirmative Action, 1940–1972, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ginorio, A. (1995) Warming the Climate for Women in Academic Science, Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spanier, B. (1995) Im/partial Science: Gender Ideology in Molecular Biology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gross, P. and Levitt, N. (1994) Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Conduct of Science (1989) On Being a Scientist, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rossiter, M. (1982) Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harding, S. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harding, S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harding, S. (1998) Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lloyd, E. (1996) Science and Anti-Science: Objectivity and Its Real Enemies, in: Nelson, L.H. and Nelson, J., eds. Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London: 217–259.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hubbard, R. (1990) Have Only Men Evolved? in: The Politics of Women’s Biology, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick: 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Longino, H. (1990) Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1989) Life in the XY Corral, Women’s Studies International Forum 12(3): 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1986) Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, E. (1991) The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles. Signs 16: 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schiebinger, L. (1989) The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schiebinger, L. (1993) Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schiebinger, L. (1999) Has Feminism Changed Science? Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steingraber, S. (1998) Living Downstream: An Ecologist Looks at Cancer and the Environment, Random House/Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keller, E. F. (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barad, K. (1996) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Realism and Social Constructivism Withou Contradiction, in: Nelson, L.H. and Nelson, J., eds. Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London: 161–194.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frankenstein, M. (1989) Relearning Mathematics: A Different Third R—Radical Math(s), Free Association Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shulman, B. (1996) What If We Change Our Axioms? Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology 3: 427–451.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Henrion, C. (1997) Women in Mathematics: The Addition of Difference, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nemecek, S. (1997) The Furor over Feminist Science, Scientific American 276 (No. 1): 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992) Building Two-Way Streets: The Case of Feminism and Science, NWSA Journal 4(3): 336–349.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonnie Spanier.

Additional information

I want to thank Jinnie Garrett for inviting me to participate in the very exciting conference (Communicating Science held at Hamilton College, Clinton, NY, USA, 3–5 October 1998) and for her encouragement in preparing this paper. I also want to thank Joan Schulz and Patricia Brown for the important discussions and assistance contributing to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spanier, B. Transforming science curricula in higher education: Feminist contributions. Sci Eng Ethics 6, 467–480 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0004-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0004-4

Keywords

Navigation