Skip to main content
Log in

Color of Salmon Fillets By Computer Vision and Sensory Panel

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food and Bioprocess Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A computer vision method was developed and used to assign color score in salmon fillet according to SalmonFan™ card. The methodology was based on the transformation of RGB to L*a*b* color space. In the algorithm, RGB values assigned directly to each pixel by the camera in the salmon fillet image, were transformed to L*a*b* values, and then matched with other L*a*b* values that represent a SalmonFan score (between 20 and 34). Colors were measured by a computer vision system (CVS) and a sensorial panel (eight panelists) under the same illumination conditions in ten independent sets of experiments. Errors from transformation of RGB to L*a*b* values by the CVS were 2.7%, 1%, and 1.7%, respectively, with a general error range of 1.83%. The coefficient of correlation between the SalmonFan score assigned by computer vision and the sensory panel was 0.95. Statistical analysis using t test was performed and showed that there were no differences in the measurements of the SalmonFan score between both methods (t c = 1.65 ≤ t = 1.96 at α = 0.05%). The methodology presented in this paper is very versatile and can potentially be used by computer-based vision systems in order to qualify salmon fillets based on color according to the SalmonFan card.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anil, K. J. (1989). Fundamentals of digital image processing. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitoyannis, I. S., Tsitsika, E. V., & Panagiotaki, P. (2005). Implementation of quality control methods (physico-chemical, microbiological and sensory) in conjunction with multivariate analysis towards fish authenticity. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 40, 237–263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbut, S. (2001). Effect of illumination source on the appearance of fresh meat cuts. Meat Science, 59, 187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbut, S. (2003). Effect to three commercial light sources on acceptability of salmon, snapper and sea bass fillets. Aquaculture, 236, 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briones, V., & Aguilera, J. M. (2005). Image analysis of changes in surface color of chocolate. Food Research International, 38, 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, W., & Ivo, W. (2008). Computer image analysis of seed shape and seed color for flax cultivar description. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 61, 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, C. J., & Sun, D. W. (2005). Pizza sauce spread classification using colour vision and support vector machines. Journal of Food Engineering, 66, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, O., & Guttormsen, A. (2006). A pigmentation model for farmed Atlantic salmon: Nonlinear regression analysis of published experimental data. Aquaculture, 253, 415–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D., & Ponce, J. (2003). Computer vision: A modern approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, J. (1999). Food color and appearance. Gaithesburg: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irudayaraj, J., & Gunasekaran, S. (2001). Optical methods: Visible, NIR and FTIR spectroscopy. In S. Gunasekaran (Ed.), Nondestructive food evaluation techniques to analyze properties and quality. New York: Marce Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. P., East, A. R., & Trujillo, F. J. (2008). Colour vision system evaluation of bicolour fruit: A case study with [`]B74¢ mango. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 49, 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larraín, R. E., Schaefer, D. M., & Reed, J. D. (2008). Use of digital images to estimate CIE color coordinates of beef. Food Research International, 41, 380–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemans, V., Magein, H., & Destain, M. F. (1998). Defects segmentation on ‘Golden Delicious’ apples by using colour machine vision. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 20, 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon, K., Mery, D., Pedreschi, F., & Leon, J. (2006). Color measurement in L*a*b* units from RGB digital images. Food Research International, 39, 1084–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magdic, D., & Dobricevic, N. (2007). Statistical evaluation of dynamic changes of ‘Idared’ apples colour during storage. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 72, 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldini, M., Nonnis Marzano, F., Fortes, G. G., Papa, R., & Gandolfi, G. (2006). Fish and seafood traceability based on AFLP markers: Elaboration of a species database. Aquaculture, 261, 487–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marty-Mahé, P., Loisel, P., Fauconneau, B., & Haffray, P. (2004). Quality traits of brown trout (Salmo trutta) cutlets described by automated color image analysis. Aquaculture, 232, 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, F., & Aguilera, J. M. (2004). Application of image analysis for classification of ripening bananas. Journal of Food Science, 69, E471–E477.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, F., Dejmek, P., & Aguilera, J. M. (2006). Calibrated color measurements of agricultural foods using image analysis. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 41, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misimi, E., Mathiassen, J. R., & Erikson, U. (2007). Computer vision-based sorting of atlantic salmon (salmo salar) fillets according to their color lever. Journal of Food Science, 71, s30–s35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, M. G., Byrne, D. V., Martens, H., Gidskehaug, L. H., Andersen, H. J., & Martens, M. (2003). Evaluation of pork colour: Prediction of visual sensory quality of meat from instrumental and computer vision methods of colour analysis. Meat Science, 65, 909–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., Abdul-Malek, S., Kamdem, E., & Jam, L. (2000). A versatile and inexpensive technique for measuring color of foods. Food Technology, 54, 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. R. (1997). Algorithms for image processing and computer vision. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedreschi, F., Leon, J., Mery, D., & Moyano, P. (2006). Development of a computer vision system to measure the color of potato chips. Food Research International, 39, 1092–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quevedo, R., Carlos, L. G., Aguilera, J. M., & Cadoche, L. (2002). Description of food surfaces and microstructural changes using fractal image texture analysis. Journal of Food Engineering, 53, 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quevedo, R., Mendoza, F., Aguilera, J., Chanona, J., & Gan, G. -L. (2008). Determination of senescent spotting in banana (Musa cavendish) using fractal texture Fourier image. Journal of Food Science, 84, 509–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezzi, S., Giani, I., Heberger, K., Axelson, D., Moretti, V., Reniero, F., et al. (2007). Classification of Gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) from 1H NMR lipid profiling combined with principal component and linear discriminant analysis. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 55, 9963–9968.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I., & Furness, T. (2006). Improving traceability in food processing and distribution. Abington, Cambridge, England: Woodhead.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stien, L., Manne, F., Ruohonene, K., Kause, A., Rungruangsak-Torrissen, K., & Kiessling, A. (2006). Automated image analysis as a tool to quantify the colour and composition of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss W.) cutlets. Aquaculture, 261, 695–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D. (2000). Inspecting pizza topping percentage and distribution by a computer vision method. Journal of Food Engineering, 44, 245–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D. -W. (2004). Computer vision-an objective, rapid and non-contact quality evaluation tool for the food industry. Journal of Food Engineering, 61, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, F., Jamin, E., Wietzerbin, K., Guerin, R., Lees, M., Morvan, E., et al. (2008). Determination of origin of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar): The use of multiprobe and multielement isotopic analyses in combination with fatty acid composition to assess wild or farmed origin. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 56, 989–997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yam, K., & Papadakis, S. (2004). A simple digital imaging method for measuring and analyzing color of food surfaces. Journal of Food Engineering, 61, 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., De Baerdemaeker, J., & Schrevens, E. (2003). Effects of different varieties and shelf storage conditions of chicory on deteriorative color changes using digital image processing and analysis. Food Research International, 36, 669–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, T., Harrison, A. D., McKellar, R., Young, J. C., Odumeru, J., Piyasena, P., et al. (2004). Determination of acceptability and shelf life of ready-to-use lettuce by digital image analysis. Food Research International, 37, 875–881.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the project FONDECYT–Chile number 1060355.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. A. Quevedo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quevedo, R.A., Aguilera, J.M. & Pedreschi, F. Color of Salmon Fillets By Computer Vision and Sensory Panel. Food Bioprocess Technol 3, 637–643 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-008-0106-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-008-0106-6

Keywords

Navigation