Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chronic neck pain and cervicogenic headaches

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Chronic axial neck pain and cervicogenic headache are common problems, and there have been significant advances in the understanding of the etiology and treatment of each. The severity and duration of pain drives the process. For patients who have had slight to moderate pain that has been present for less than 6 months and have no significant motor loss, strength training of anterior, posterior, and interscapular muscle groups coupled with body mechanics training is prescribed. After 8 weeks, if the patient is better, exercises are continued at home or in a gym. If the patient is not better, physical therapy is continued for up to 8 more weeks. In patients with motor loss or severe pain, radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be ordered at the initial visit. In patients with slight to moderate pain who are not better by 4 to 6 months, plain radiographs of the neck and MRI should be ordered. Based on the results, a spinal injection is usually prescribed. If MRI reveals spinal stenosis of the central or lateral canal, or a disc herniation, an epidural corticosteroid injection should be ordered. If the epidural provides good relief, the patient can be referred for more aggressive physical therapy and repeat the epidural as needed up to a maximum of three times. If there is no pathology within the canal, medial branch blocks and intra-articular steroid injections can be ordered based on the joints that are most tender or where disc space narrowing is greatest, or MRI or radiographs are recommended. If there is excellent relief from the medial branch block and joint injections, repeat when the steroids wear off. If there is good relief again, but pain recurs, medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy is recommended. For patients with one or two level disc degeneration that has not responded, a psychologic evaluation and discography is recommended. If there are no significant psychologic abnormalities, and one or two (rarely three) painful discs, surgical consultation is recommended. Adjunctive low-dose opioid analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and perhaps tricyclic antidepressants are used to supplement the program at mid- and late stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Bovim G, Schrader H, Sand T: Neck pain in the general population. Spine 1994, 19:1307–1309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Borghouts JA, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM: Costof-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996. Pain 1999, 80:629–636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Merskey H, Bogduk N: Classification of Chronic Pain, edn 2. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dwyer A, Aprill C, Bogduk N: Cervical zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. I: a study in normal volunteers. Spine 1990, 15:453–457.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aprill C, Dwyer, Bogduk N: Cervical zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. II: a clinical evaluation. Spine 1990, 15:458–461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schelhaus KP, Smith MD, Gundry CR, Pollei SR: Cervical discogenic pain: prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers. Spine 1996, 21:300–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schellhaus KP, Garvey TA, Johnson BA, et al.: Cervical discography: analysis of provoked responses at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5. AJNR 2000, 21:269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Slipman CW, Plastaras C, Patel R, et al.: Provocative cervical discographic symptom mapping. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cervical Spine Research Society. New York; December 4, 1993.

  9. Chabot MC, Montgomery DM: The pathophysiology of axial and radicular neck pain. Semin Spine Surg 1995, 7:2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards CC, Riew D, Anderson PA, et al.: Cervical myelopathy: current diagnostic and treatment strategies. The Spine Journal 2003, 3:68–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao R: Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84:1872–1881.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bogduk N, Marsland A: The cervical zygapophysial joints as a source of neck pain. Spine 1988, 13:610–617.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bogduk N, Aprill C: On the nature of neck pain, discography and cervical zygapophysial joint blocks. Pain 1993, 54:213–217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bogduk N, Lord SM: Cervical zygapophyseal joint pain. Neurosurg Q 1998, 8:107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwarzer AC, Wang S, O’Driscoll D, et al.: The ability of computed tomography to identify a painful zygapophyseal joint in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 1995, 20:907–912.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mercer S, Bogduk N: The ligaments and anulus fibrosus of human adult cervical intervertebral discs. Spine 1999, 24:619–628.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bogduk N, Windsor M, Ingus A: The innervation of the cervical intervertebral discs. Spine 1988, 13:2–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grubb SA, Kelly CK: Cervical discography: clinical implications from 12 years of experience. Spine 2000, 25:1382–1389. This is a review of the authors’ experience with cervical discography with respect to surgical planning. They recommended that all discs should be studied and found more cases in which surgery was not recommended than it was recommended.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Whitecloud TS, Seago RA: Cervical discogenic syndrome: results of operative intervention in patients with positive discography. Spine 1987, 12:313–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Palit M, Schofferman J, Goldthwaite N, et al.: Anterior discectomy and fusion for the management of neck pain. Spine 1999, 24:2224–2228. This is a prospective cohort series of the results of ACDF in well-selected patients with refractory severe discogenic neck pain. Pain scores decreased by more than 50%, function scores improved approximately 40%, and 79% of patients were satisfied with their outcomes.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Garvey TA, Transfeldt EE, Malcolm JR, Kos P: Outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as perceived by patients treated for dominant axial-mechanical cervical spine pain. Spine 2002, 27:1887–1895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haldeman S, Dagenais S: Cervicogenic headaches: a critical review. The Spine Journal 2001, 1:31–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nilsson N: The prevalence of cervicogenic headache in a random population sample of 20 to 59 year olds. Spine 1995, 20:1884–1888.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sjaastad O, Fredriksen TA, Pfaffenrath V: Cervicogenic headache: diagnostic criteria. Headache 1990, 30:725–726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sjaastad O, Fredriksen TA, Pfaffenrath V: Cervicogenic headache: diagnostic criteria: the Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group. Headache 1998, 38:442–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lord S, Barnsley L, Wallis B, Bogduk N: Third occipital headache: a prevalence study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1994, 57:1187–1190.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dreyfuss P, Michaelsen M, Fletcher D: Atlanto-occipital and lateral atlanto-axial joint pain patterns. Spine 1994, 19:1125–1131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bogduk N: Letter to the editor. Spine 1999, 24:308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schofferman J: What to Do For a Pain in Your Neck: A Fireside Book. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sweeney TB, Prentice CP: Cervico-thoracic muscular stabilization techniques. In Spine Care: Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment. Edited by White AH, Schofferman J. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ylinen J, Esa-Pekka T, Nykanen M, et al.: Active neck muscle training in the treatment of chronic neck pain in women. JAMA 2003, 289:2509–2516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Randlev A, Ostergaard M, Manniche C, et al.: Intensive dynamic training for females with chronic neck/ shoulder pain: a randomized trial. Clin Rehabil 1998, 12:200–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Berg HE, Berggren G, Tesch PA: Dynamic neck strength training effect on pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75:661–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Highland TR, Dreisinger TE, Vie LL, Russell GS: Changes in isometric strength and range of motion of the isolatd cervical spine after eight weeks of clinical rehabilitation. Spine 1992, 17:S78-S82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Silverman JL, Rodriquez AA, Agre JC: Quantitative cervical flexor strength in healthy subjects and in subjects with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991, 72:679–681.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Evans R, Bronfort G, Nelson B, Goldsmith CH: Two-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of spinal manipulation and two types of exercise for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine 2002, 27:2383–2389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jordan A, Bendix T, Nielsen H, et al.: Intensive training, physiotherapy, or manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine 1998, 23:311–319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schofferman J: Medication management for severe refractory low back pain. In Orthopedic Knowledge Update (OKU) Spine-2. Edited by Fardon DF, Garfin SR. Chicago: AAOS Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Castagnera L, Maurette P, Pointillart V, et al.: Long-term results of cervical epidural steroid injection with and withoug morphine in chronic cervical radicular pain. Pain 1994, 58:239–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bush K, Hillier S: Outcome of cervical radiculopathy treated with periradicular/epidural corticosteroid injections: a prospective study with independent clinical review. Eur Spine J 1996, 5:319–325.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N: Percutaneous radio-frequency neurotomy for chronic cervical zygapophyseal joint pain. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:1721–1726. This prospective randomized controlled study demonstrated the high success rate of radiofrequency neurotomy for cervical facet joint pain. The median duration of relief was 267 days, and, when pain recurred, the procedure could be repeated.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lord S, Barnsley L, Bogduk N: Percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy in the treatment of cervical zygapophysial joint pain: a caution. Neurosurgery 1995, 36:732–739.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Barnsley L, Lord S, Wallis B, Bogduk N: Lack of effect of intraarticular corticosteroids for chronic pain in the cervical zygapophyseal joints. N Engl J Med 1994, 330:1047–1050.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schofferman, Garges K, Goldthwaite N, et al.: Upper cervical anterior discectomy and fusion improves discogenic cervical headaches. Spine 2002, 27:2240–2244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, F.L., Schofferman, J. Chronic neck pain and cervicogenic headaches. Curr Treat Options Neurol 5, 493–498 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-996-0017-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-996-0017-7

Keywords

Navigation