Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Low back pain

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

  • •Low back problems are extremely common. In the United States, it is estimated that 15% to 20% of the population, and approximately half of working-age adults, admit to back pain each year.

  • •Low back pain (LBP) is a symptom and not a specific disease, and there are a large number of potential causes. The vast majority of patients with LBP have a musculoskeletal cause. Ninety percent of patients with acute low back problems recover within a month with very conservative treatment. Because of the multiple possible causes in the musculoskeletal category, and because of the self-limited nature of most patients’ pain, only about 15% of patients can be given a specific diagnosis to explain their LBP.

  • •Although 90% of patients with LBP have self-limited disease, recurrent attacks of pain are common, and approximately 10% of patients develop chronic LBP.

  • •In general, LBP is over-evaluated and over-treated, which results in wasted money and medical resources, and often yields inferior clinical outcomes.

  • •The physician’s job, when evaluating a patient with acute LBP, is to look for "red flags"—symptoms and signs that should prompt additional evaluation and treatment.

  • •Without "red flag" conditions, LBP should be treated with "comfort control" measures only. These measures include activity modification and the use of simple analgesics. Manipulation therapy may be helpful in the short term (within the first month of onset), although other physical therapies are more helpful beyond 1 month from onset.

  • •Surgical intervention on the spine for patients without tumors, infection, and fracture should be reserved for patients with progressive or unrelenting compression of one or more lumbosacral nerve roots by a herniated intervertebral disk.

  • •Neurologists should be involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients with LBP, because many of the worrisome underlying conditions affect the nerve roots, and most of the surgical interventions are based on documentation of the presence of nerve root impingement. Neurologists can determine if these indications are present, and do not have a vested interest in recommending costly procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Frymoyer JW, Ducker TB, Hadler NM, et al.:The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice, edn 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical Practice Guideline, Quick Reference Guide Number 14: Acute Low Back Problems in Adults. Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994. AHCPR publication 95-0643.

  3. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 14: Acute Low Back Problems in Adults. Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994. AHCPR publication 95-0642. Twenty-three panelists and 122 additional contributors crafted this superb, well annotated, evidence-based clinical practice guideline with 360 references. The algorithm based on this guideline is very helpful and is also shown in reference #2. Although this guideline was published in 1994, the recommendations have held up exceedingly well.

  4. McCulloch JA, Transfeldt E: Macnab’s Backache, edn 3. Baltimore: Williams, and Wilkins: 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement Health Care Guideline: Adult Low Back Pain. Bloomington, MN; November 1999.

  6. Vroomen PCAJ, de Krom MCTFM, Knottnerus JA: Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of sciatica due to disc herniation: a systematic review. J Neurol 1999, 246:899–906.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994, 331:69–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Khurana S, et al.: The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms. Spine 2000, 25:1373–1380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leboeuf-Yde C: Smoking and low back pain. Spine 1999, 24:1463–1470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagen KB, Hilde G, Jamtvedt G, et al.: Bed Rest for Acute Low Back Pain and Sciatica (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM: Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine 1997, 22:2128–2156. This evidence-based systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions for acute and chronic low back pain contains 163 references. This was a forerunner of the Cochrane Systematic Reviews, which look at the individual treatments in even greater detail.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Tulder MW, Scholten RJ, Koes BW, et al.: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schnitzer TJ, Gray WL, Paster RZ, et al.: Efficacy of tramadol in treatment of chronic low back pain. J Rheumatol 2000, 27:772–778.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown RL, Fleming MF, Patterson JJ: Chronic opioid analgesic therapy for chronic low back pain. J Am Board Fam Pract 1996, 9:191–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schofferman J: Long-term opioid analgesic therapy for severe refractory lumbar spine pain. Clin J Pain 1999, 15:136–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Atkinson JH, Slater MA, Williams RA, et al.: A placebocontrolled randomized clinical trial of nortriptyline for chronic low back pain. Pain 1998, 76:287–296.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelemans PJ, Bie RA de, Vet HCW de, Sturmans F: Injection therapy for subacute and chronic benign low back pain (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000. An up-to-date review of injection therapy for back pain. This review very nicely documents the lack of evidence in favor of injection therapy for back pain, which is nevertheless widely used.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rozenberg S, Dubourg G, Khalifa P, et al.: Efficacy of epidural steroids in low back pain and sciatica. Rev Rheum Engl Ed 1999, 66:79–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson JNA, Grant IC, Waddell G: Surgery for lumbar disc prolapse (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software; 2000. This Cochrame Systematic Review documents the evidence in favor of and the indications for surgery on the herniated lumbar disk.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gibson JNA, Waddell G, Grant IC: Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000. This is another well documented Cochrane Review that addresses surgery for degenerative lumbar disk disease. The authors document the lack of proven efficacy for the ever-growing number of procedures that are performed on the lumbar spine by orthopedists and neurosurgeons fro chronic low back pain associated with lumbar spondylosis.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hanley EN, David SM: Lumbar arthrodesis for the treatment of back pain. J Bone Joint Surg 1999, 81:716–730.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Esmail R, Koes BW:Exercise therapy for low back pain (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Torstensen TA, Ljunggren AE, Meen HD, et al.: Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: a pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine 1998, 23:2616–2624.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tulder MW van, Cherkin DC, Berman B, et al.:Acupuncture for low back pain (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Tulder MW, Ostelo RWJG, Vlaeyen JWS, et al.:Behavioural treatment for chronic low back pain (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tulder MW van, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW:Back schools for non-specific low back pain (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ, et al.: Efficacy of traction for nonspecific low back pain (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gadsby JG, Flowerdew MW: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic low back pain (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, edn 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ghoname EA, Craig WF, White PF, et al.: Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Crossover Study. JAMA 1999, 281:818–823.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cortet B, Cotton A, Boutry N, et al.: Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study. J Rheumatol 1999, 26:2222–2228.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Karasek M, Bogduk N: Twelve-month follow-up of a controlled trial of intradiscal thermal anuloplasty for back pain due to internal disc disruption. Spine 2000, 25:2601–2607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First Street, SW, 55905, Rochester, MN, USA

    JD Bartleson MD

Authors
  1. JD Bartleson MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartleson, J. Low back pain. Curr Treat Options Neurol 3, 159–168 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-001-0051-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-001-0051-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation