Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimizing Patient Selection and Outcomes for Surgical Treatment of GERD and Achalasia

  • Esophagus (E Dellon, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common disorder in the United States and other western countries. In addition to troublesome symptoms, this condition is associated with impaired quality of life and the potential for disease progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Acid suppression medications are extremely effective for the relief of heartburn symptoms, but don’t address the physiologic derangements that cause reflux. The goal of an antireflux procedure is to correct these defects and abolish the dietary and lifestyle compromises that accompany medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux. The Nissen fundoplication has a long and well-established track record and new options such as the LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation device allow correction of reflux with fewer side-effects than a fundoplication in appropriate patients. These options should be considered in patients incompletely satisfied on medical therapy and in those with risk factors for disease progression. The role of these therapies in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease will be reviewed in this chapter. Achalasia is an uncommon motility disorder of the esophagus that leads to profound dysphagia symptoms and greatly impaired alimentary satisfaction. Pneumatic dilation offers an endoscopic approach to the management of these patients, but often requires repeated dilatations due to the inconsistent disruption of the lower esophageal sphincter with this technique. An alternative is a laparoscopic Heller myotomy, which offers precise division of the muscle of the lower esophageal sphincter, but requires incisions and lifestyle restrictions while healing. A new therapy, per-oral endoscopic myotomy, allows the precise division of the lower esophageal sphincter muscle as in a laparoscopic myotomy, but is done endoscopically with no external incisions. The role of these therapies in patients will be reviewed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Worrell SG, DeMeester SR, Greene CL, et al. Pharyngeal pH monitoring better predicts a successful outcome for extraesophageal reflux symptoms after antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4113–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Campos GM, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:292–300. This article defines the key factors that predict successful outcome with a fundoplication.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collis JL. An operation for haitus hernia with short esophagus. J Thorac Surg. 1957;34:768–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, et al. Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.[Erratum appears in J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Dec;213(6):815]. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:461–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alicuben ET, Worrell SG, DeMeester SR. Resorbable biosynthetic mesh for crural reinforcement during hiatal hernia repair. Am Surg. 2014;80:1030–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zehetner J, Lipham JC, Ayazi S, et al. A simplified technique for intrathoracic stomach repair: laparoscopic fundoplication with Vicryl mesh and BioGlue crural reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:675–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alicuben ET, Worrell SG, DeMeester SR. Impact of crural relaxing incisions, collis gastroplasty, and non-cross-linked human dermal mesh crural reinforcement on early hiatal hernia recurrence rates. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:988–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ritter MP, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Treatment of advanced gastroesophageal reflux disease with Collis gastroplasty and Belsey partial fundoplication. Arch Surg. 1998;133:523–8. discussion 528–529.

  9. Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Ayazi S, et al. Laparoscopic wedge fundectomy for collis gastroplasty creation in patients with a foreshortened esophagus. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1030–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greene CL, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, et al. Diaphragmatic relaxing incisions during laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4532–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zehetner J, Demeester SR, Ayazi S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia: the second decade. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:813–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Allison PR. Hiatus hernia: (a 20-year retrospective survey). Ann Surg. 1973;178:273–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Furnee EJ, Draaisma WA, Gooszen HG, et al. Tailored or routine addition of an antireflux fundoplication in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a comparative cohort study. World J Surg. 2011;35:78–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Broeders JA, Broeders EA, Watson DI, et al. Objective outcomes 14 years after laparoscopic anterior 180-degree partial versus nissen fundoplication: results from a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2013;258:233–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Horvath KD, Jobe BA, Herron DM, Swanstrom LL. Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication is an inadequate procedure for patients with severe reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:583–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lagergren J, Ye W, Lagergren P, Lu Y. The risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma after antireflux surgery. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1297–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DeMeester SR, DeMeester TR. Columnar mucosa and intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus: fifty years of controversy. Ann Surg. 2000;231:303–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DeMeester SR. Reflux, Barrett’s, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: can we disrupt the pathway? J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:941–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Malfertheiner P, Nocon M, Vieth M, et al. Evolution of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease over 5 years under routine medical care–the ProGERD study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:154–64. This article shows the natural history of medical therapy in a cohort of patients followed with endoscopy over 5 years, and details the progression to Barrett’s esophagus in some patients. Risk factors for progressive disease are identified.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leodolter A, Nocon M, Vieth M, et al. Progression of specialized intestinal metaplasia at the cardia to macroscopically evident Barrett’s esophagus: an entity of concern in the ProGERD study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1429–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganz RA, Peters JH, Horgan S, et al. Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:719–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oberg S, Johansson J, Wenner J, et al. Endoscopic surveillance of columnar-lined esophagus: frequency of intestinal metaplasia detection and impact of antireflux surgery. Ann Surg. 2001;234:619–26.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Presentation, diagnosis, and management of achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:887–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, et al. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1807–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:718–25. This article shows that manometric subtypes of achalsia influence outcome with pneumatic dilatation, and the poor outcome with Type III patients suggests that alternative treatments should be used for patients with this subtype of achalasia.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pellegrini C, Wetter LA, Patti M, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagomyotomy. Initial experience with a new approach for the treatment of achalasia. Ann Surg. 1992;216:291–6. discussion 296-299.

  27. Oelschlager BK, Chang L, Pellegrini CA. Improved outcome after extended gastric myotomy for achalasia. Arch Surg. 2003;138:490–5. discussion 495-497.

  28. Richards WO, Torquati A, Holzman MD, et al. Heller myotomy versus Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication for achalasia: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2004;240:405–12. discussion 412-405.

  29. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42:265–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Inoue H, Ikeda H, Hosoya T, et al. Submucosal endoscopic tumor resection for subepithelial tumors in the esophagus and cardia. Endoscopy. 2012;44:225–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Swanstrom LL, Kurian A, Dunst CM, et al. Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg. 2012;256:659–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Von Renteln D, Fuchs KH, Fockens P, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:309–311.e301–303.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Arafat FO, et al. Analysis of a learning curve and predictors of intraoperative difficulty for peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM). J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:92–8. discussion 98-99.

  34. Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata A, et al. Peroral endoscopic esophageal myotomy: defining the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:719–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Li QL, Zhou PH, Yao LQ, et al. Early diagnosis and management of delayed bleeding in the submucosal tunnel after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:370–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hungness ES, Teitelbaum EN, Santos BF, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:228–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Greene CL, Chang EJ, Oh DS et al. High resolution manometry sub-classification of Achalasia: does it really matter? : does Achalasia sub-classification matter? Surg Endosc 2014.

  38. Bhayani N, Kurian A, Dunst CM, et al. A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1098–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Steven R. DeMeester has received consultancy fees, paid travel accommodations, and payment for development of educational presentations from Bard and Novadaq. Dr. DeMeester also has received honoraria from Bard and consultancy fees from C2 Therapeutics.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven R. DeMeester MD.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Esophagus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeMeester, S.R. Optimizing Patient Selection and Outcomes for Surgical Treatment of GERD and Achalasia. Curr Treat Options Gastro 13, 1–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-014-0035-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-014-0035-6

Keywords

Navigation