Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outlet dysfunction constipation

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

  • The diagnosis of outlet dysfunction constipation in patients with idiopathic constipation that responds poorly or not at all to conservative measures, such as fiber supplements, fluids, and stimulant laxatives, is based upon diagnostic testing. These tests include colonic transit of radio-opaque markers, anorectal manometry or electromyography, barium defecography, and expulsion of a water-filled balloon. The literature suggests that conditions such as pelvic floor dyssynergia exist but may be over-diagnosed as a laboratory artifact. In our laboratory, we screen patients with balloon expulsion studies, and then test for dyssynergia only if the result of the balloon expulsion test is abnormal. In my opinion, anal sphincter electromyogram and manometry are equivalent in establishing the diagnosis. Barium defecography is helpful in making a diagnosis of a rectocele, but I prefer to document that vaginal pressure on the rectocele significantly improves rectal evacuation. Manometry also helps to establish the presence of megarectum, hypotonia, and weak expulsion efforts.

  • Conceptually, biofeedback training, which incorporates simulated defecation, is the most logical approach to pelvic floor dyssynergia. It incurs no risk and benefits 60% to 80% of patients. The drawbacks are the time-intensive nature of the therapy and the short-term costs, which are offset if there is sustained benefit.

  • There is no evidence that biofeedback is helpful in children with constipation. Habit training has established benefits, but recurrences are frequent and long-term reinforcement is helpful to maintain success. Laxatives and enemas are adjunctive therapies in both habit training and biofeedback.

  • Surgery is effective in those uncommon patients with physiologically significant rectoceles, but surgical division of the puborectalis muscle is risky and unproven. Likewise, botulinum toxin injection into the puborectalis is unproven, but the effects are rarely permanent should incontinence occur.

  • Diagnostic measures and therapeutic success are enhanced when patients are seen in centers experienced with the evaluation of these disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Whitehead WE, Wald A, Diamant NE, et al.: Functional disorders of the anus and rectum. In Rome II: The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment: A Multinational Consensus, edn 2. Edited by Drossman DA. McLean, VA: Degnon Associates; 2000:483–532. A comprehensive and extensively referenced classification of functional anorectal disorders, including outlet dysfunction disorders.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wald A: Anorectal and colonic dysmotility. In Slide Atlas of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol 2. Edited by Feldman F. Philadelphia: Current Medicine; 1996: Slide 30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts JP: Evidence from dynamic integrated proctography to redefine anismus. Br J Surg 1992, 79:1213–1215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiotakakou-Faliakou E, Kamm MA, Roy AJ, et al.: Biofeedback provides long-term benefit for patients with intractable slow and normal transit constipation. Gut 1998, 42:517–521.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Enck P: Biofeedback training in disordered defecation: a critical review. Dig Dis Sci 1993, 38:1953–1960. A critical review of the literature concerning efficacy of biofeedback for functional disorders of defecation.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duthie HL, Bartolo DCC: Anismus: the cause of constipation? Results of investigation and treatment. World J Surg 1992, 16:831–835.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Voderholzer WA, Neuhaus DA, Klauser AG, et al.: Paradoxical sphincter contraction is rarely indicative of anismus. Gut 1997, 41:258–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitehead WE, Schuster MM: Gastrointestinal Disorders: Behavioral and Physiological Basis for Treatment. Orlando: Academic Press; 1985:255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bleijenberg G, Kuijpers HC: Biofeedback treatment of constipation: a comparison of two methods. Am J Gastroenterol 1994, 89:1021–1026.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ho YH, Tan M, Goh HS: Clinical and physiologic effects of biofeedback in outlet obstruction constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1996, 39:520–524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koutsomanis D, Lennard-Jones JE, Roy AJ, et al.: Controlled randomized trial of visual biofeedback versus muscle training without a visual display for intractable constipation. Gut 1995, 37:95–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koutsomanis D, Lennard-Jones JE, Kamm MA: Prospective study of biofeedback treatment for patients with slow and normal transit constipation. Euro J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1994, 6:131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Levy JR, et al.: Biofeedback in colorectal practice: a multicenter, statewide, three-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:827–831.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rao SS, Welcher KD, Pelsang RE: Effects of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function in obstructive defecation. Dig Dis Sci 1997, 42:2197–2205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilliland R, Heymen JS, Altomare DF, et al.: Biofeedback for intractable rectal pain: outcome and predictors of success. Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:190–196.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Büller H, et al.: Biofeedback training in treatment of childhood constipation: a randomised controlled study. Lancet 1996, 348:776–778. One of the rare randomized controlled studies in the biofeedback literature, and which failed to demonstrate a significant role for biofeedback therapy in children with this disorder.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hallan RI, Melling J, Womack NR, et al.: Treatment of anismus in intractable constipation with botulinum A toxin. Lancet 1988, 714–717.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wald, A. Outlet dysfunction constipation. Curr Treat Options Gastro 4, 293–297 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-001-0054-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-001-0054-y

Keywords

Navigation