Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deep Phenotyping in Cardiovascular Disease

  • State-of-the-Art Informatics (C Stultz, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

To review the opportunities and challenges of phenotyping cardiovascular diseases in the modern era.

Recent findings

More recently, the emerging field of precision medicine aims to provide the best available care for each patient based on stratification into new disease subclasses with a common biological basis. The discovery of such subclasses at the correct scale and speed, as well as the translation of this knowledge into clinical care, will depend critically upon digital and computational resources to capture, store, and exchange phenotypic data and upon sophisticated algorithms to integrate these data with genomic variation, functional genomics profiles, and existing clinical information. Deep phenotyping can be defined as the comprehensive and precise analysis of phenotypic traits/abnormalities for such stratification. Recently, the term phenotype has largely been used to understand the “binary” output of a specific genetic code, in so-called genotype-phenotype correlations, but this has tended to constrain the use of the terminology to artificially dichotomized disease syndromes.

Summary

In the modern world, as we incorporate functional genomics into disease analysis, there has been a call to transform our understanding of individual patients via deep phenotyping or a more comprehensive study of the phenotype, i.e., multidimensional phenomics. Cardiovascular medicine, with its heterogeneity, prevalence, and therapeutic options, is a prime focus of precision medicine. In this article, we outline the current state of deep phenotyping in cardiovascular disease, including the rationale, current challenges, and opportunities for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Thomas H, et al. Global Atlas of Cardiovascular Disease 2000–2016: The Path to Prevention and Control. Glob Heart. 2018;13(3):143–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angell SY, et al. The American Heart Association 2030 Impact Goal: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e120–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson PN. Deep phenotyping for precision medicine. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(5):777–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah SH, et al. Opportunities for the cardiovascular community in the precision medicine initiative. Circulation. 2016;133(2):226–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. • Chong JX, et al. The genetic basis of Mendelian phenotypes: discoveries, challenges, and opportunities. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97(2):199–215 A Summary of modern phenotypes.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nachtomy O, Shavit A, Yakhini Z. Gene expression and the concept of the phenotype. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2007;38(1):238–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benjamin I, et al. American Heart Association Cardiovascular Genome-Phenome Study: foundational basis and program. Circulation. 2015;131(1):100–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li W, et al. SCN5A Variants: Association With Cardiac Disorders. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira R, et al. Phenotypic variability and incomplete penetrance of spontaneous fractures in an inbred strain of transgenic mice expressing a mutated collagen gene (COL1A1). J Clin Invest. 1994;93(4):1765–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Donnell CJ. Opportunities and challenges for polygenic risk scores in prognostication and prevention of cardiovascular disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2020.

  11. Ndiaye NC, et al. Cardiovascular diseases and genome-wide association studies. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(19–20):1697–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Houle D, Govindaraju DR, Omholt S. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(12):855–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmitter D, Cotter G, Voors AA. Clinical use of novel biomarkers in heart failure: towards personalized medicine. Heart Fail Rev. 2014;19(3):369–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yancy CW, Lee DC. Personalized medicine in heart failure: are we there yet? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(4):419–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schirmer SH, Hohl M, Bohm M. Gender differences in heart failure: paving the way towards personalized medicine? Eur Heart J. 2010;31(10):1165–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bilder RM, et al. Phenomics: the systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale. Neuroscience. 2009;164(1):30–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bravata DM, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2296–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Perez MV, et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(20):1909–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Delude CM. Deep phenotyping: the details of disease. Nature. 2015;527(7576):S14–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Diogo D, et al. Phenome-wide association studies across large population cohorts support drug target validation. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Denny JC, et al. PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(9):1205–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. John B, Lewis KR. Chromosome variability and geographic distribution in insects. Science. 1966;152(3723):711–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kulminski AM, et al. Uncoupling associations of risk alleles with endophenotypes and phenotypes: insights from the ApoB locus and heart-related traits. Aging Cell. 2017;16(1):61–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. •• Leopold JA, Loscalzo J. Emerging role of precision medicine in cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2018;122(9):1302–15 A Review of the challenges facing precision medicine.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil Kapur MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Sunil Kapur and Calum A MacRae declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on State-of-the-Art Informatics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kapur, S., MacRae, C.A. Deep Phenotyping in Cardiovascular Disease. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 23, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-020-00881-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-020-00881-3

Keywords

Navigation