Abstract
Purpose of Review
Current guidelines recommend against surgical repair of subclinical varicoceles (SCVs) for infertility; several studies demonstrate mixed fertility results after SCV correction. To determine whether surgical correction of SCV improves semen parameters and/or reproductive outcomes, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Seven biomedical literature databases were searched through January 2018 for studies that assessed reproductive outcomes and/or change in semen parameters in men with corrected SCV compared to either (1) uncorrected SCV or (2) corrected clinical varicocele. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.
Recent Findings
Data were extracted from 13 studies involving 1357 men. Overall, the risk of bias for included studies was high and without a consistent SCV definition across studies. Surgical correction of SCV was associated with a minor increase in sperm density and total motile sperm count (TMSC) compared to uncorrected SCV. This increase in semen parameters is not clinically significant, as men prior to varicocelectomy were on average normospermic nor was correction of a SCV associated with an increase in pregnancy rates when compared to men with uncorrected SCV. Comparing corrected SCV to corrected clinical varicocele, SCV correction resulted in a smaller increase in TMSC but no difference in average annual pregnancy rate.
Summary
The risk of bias within and heterogeneity between studies assessing SCV correction are high, yet overall very little clinical benefit is derived from SCV correction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Clarke BG. Incidence of varicocele in normal men and among men of different ages. JAMA. 1966;198:1121–2.
Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:613–6.
Kohn TP, Kohn JR, Pastuszak AW. Varicocelectomy before assisted reproductive technology: are outcomes improved? Fertil Steril. 2017;108:385–91.
Shiraishi K, Takihara H, Matsuyama H. Elevated scrotal temperature, but not varicocele grade, reflects testicular oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis. World J Urol. 2010;28:359–64.
Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970;21:606–9.
Narayan P, Amplatz K, Gonazlez R. Varicocele and male subfertility. Fertil Steril. 1981;36:92–7.
Yarborough MA, Burns JR, Keller FS. Incidence and clinical significance of subclinical scrotal varicoceles. J Urol. 1989;141:1372–4.
•• ASRM. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1556–60. This guideline report published by ASRM recommends against correction of a subclinical varicocele for the sake of improving fertility.
Alshehri FM, Akbar MH, Altwairgi AK, AlThaqufi OJ. Preoperative duplex ultrasound parameters predicting male fertility after successful varicocelectomy. Saudi Med J. 2015;36:1439–45.
• Cantoro U, Polito M, Muzzonigro G. Reassessing the role of subclinical varicocele in infertile men with impaired semen quality: a prospective study. Urology. 2015;85:826–30. Only recently published studies assessing the role of correcting a subclinical varicocele. This prospective study demonstrated a significant improvement in semen parameters and pregnancy rate after embolization.
Dhabuwala CB, Hamid S, Moghissi KS. Clinical versus subclinical varicocele: improvement in fertility after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:854–7.
Donkol RH, Salem T. Paternity after varicocelectomy: preoperative sonographic parameters of success. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:593–9.
Jarow JP, Ogle SR, Eskew LA. Seminal improvement following repair of ultrasound detected subclinical varicoceles. J Urol. 1996;155:1287–90.
Ketabchi AA, Ahmadinejad M, Ehsan M. Comparison of the effects of varicocelectomy on the spermiogram of patients with subclinical versus clinical varicocele. Acta Medica Iranica. 2005;43:249–52.
Marsman JWP, Brand R, Schats R, Bernardus RE. Clinical and subclinical varicocele: a useful distinction? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;60:165–9.
Pierik FH, Vreeburg JTM, Stijnen T, Van Roijen JH, Dohle GR, Laméris JS, et al. Improvement of sperm count and motility after ligation of varicoceles detected with colour Doppler ultrasonography. Int J Androl. 1998;21:256–60.
Seo JT, Kim KT, Moon MH, Kim WT. The significance of microsurgical varicocelectomy in the treatment of subclinical varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1907–10.
Tinga DJ, Jager S, Bruijnen CL, Kremer J, Mensink HJ. Factors related to semen improvement and fertility after varicocele operation. Fertil Steril. 1984;41:404–10.
Unal D, Yeni E, Verit A, Karatas OF. Clomiphene citrate versus varicocelectomy in treatment of subclinical varicocele: a prospective randomized study. Int J Urol Off J Japan Urol Assoc. 2001;8:227–30.
Vermeulen A, Vandeweghe M. Improved fertility after varicocele correction: fact or fiction? Fertil Steril. 1984;42:249–56.
Yamamoto M, Hibi H, Hirata Y, Miyake K, Ishigaki T. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate in patients with subclinical varicocele: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Urol. 1996;155:1636–8.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9. w64
Bjorndahl L, Barratt CL, Mortimer D, Jouannet P. ‘How to count sperm properly’: checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:227–32.
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–5.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synthesis Methods. 2010;1:97–111.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2003;327:557–60.
R-Core-Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. In. Vol. 2015. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Trum JW, Gubler FM, Laan R, van der Veen F. The value of palpation, varicoscreen contact thermography and colour Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of varicocele. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1232–5.
•• Dubin JM, Greer AB, Kohn TP, Masterson TA, Ji L, Ramasamy R. Men with severe oligospermia appear to benefit from varicocele repair: a cost-effectiveness analysis of assisted reproductive technology. Urology. 2018;111:99–103. This cost-effectiveness analysis determines that correcting a varicocele with semen parameters < 2 million total motile sperm with subsequent improvement to > 10 million total motile sperm is more cost-effective than simply starting with IVF.
Trussell JC, Christman GM, Ohl DA, Legro RS, Krawetz SA, Snyder PJ, et al. Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1299–305.
te Velde ER, Eijkemans R, Habbema HD. Variation in couple fecundity and time to pregnancy, an essential concept in human reproduction. Lancet (Lond Engl). 2000;355:1928–9.
Role of Funding Source
A.W.P. is a National Institutes of Health K12 Scholar supported by a Male Reproductive Health Research Career Development Physician-Scientist Award (HD073917-01) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Program (to Dolores J. Lamb).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Taylor P. Kohn, Samuel J. Ohlander, Jake S. Jacob, Tina M. Griffin, Larry I. Lipshultz, and Alexander W. Pastuszak each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Andrology and Infertility
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kohn, T.P., Ohlander, S.J., Jacob, J.S. et al. The Effect of Subclinical Varicocele on Pregnancy Rates and Semen Parameters: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Urol Rep 19, 53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0798-8
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0798-8