Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: What is the Goal?

  • Female Urology (K Kobashi, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this review is to discuss the main goals of pelvic organ prolapse repair. Pelvic organ prolapse symptoms are variable, and prolapse degree does not necessarily correlate with perceived symptoms or other associated conditions including urinary, defecatory, and sexual dysfunction. Treatment for pelvic organ prolapse is based upon symptom bother and patient expectations. There are various surgical approaches to treat pelvic organ prolapse; however, there is no standardized definition of cure or success. Physician goals of pelvic surgery to correct prolapse include restoration of anatomy, resolution of patient symptoms, avoidance of complications and attainment of patient goals. However, patient’s expectations may differ, and discussing preoperative goals and setting realistic expectations prior to treatment may guide surgical therapy and improve patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance; •• Of major importance

  1. Samuelsson EC et al. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(2 Pt 1):299–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen AL et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith FJ et al. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Subak LL et al. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(4):646–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers GR et al. Sexual function in women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(6):361–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozel B et al. The impact of pelvic organ prolapse on sexual function in women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(1):14–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barber MD et al. Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(2):281–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghielmetti T et al. Gynaecological operations: do they improve sexual life? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;129(2):104–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clemons JL et al. Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(2):345–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clemons JL et al. Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1025–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DeLancey JO, Morley GW. Total colpocleisis for vaginal eversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(6):1228–32. discussion 1232-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fitzgerald MP et al. Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(12):1603–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Steers WD. Colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse: patient goals, quality of life, and satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):341–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crisp CC, et al. Body image, regret, and satisfaction following colpocleisis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2013.

  15. Sze EH, Karram MM. Transvaginal repair of vault prolapse: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(3):466–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weber AM et al. The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(3):178–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Swift S et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):795–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bradley CS, Nygaard IE. Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(4):759–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swift SE, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse: defining the disease. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(4):201–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ellerkmann RM et al. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1332–7. discussion 1337-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Burrows LJ et al. Pelvic symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(5 Pt 1):982–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghetti C et al. Pelvic organ descent and symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):53–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barber MD et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):600–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD. Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1455–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Digesu GA et al. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112(7):971–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hullfish KL et al. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Steers WD. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):201–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Elkadry EA et al. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1551–7. discussion 1557-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Komesu YM et al. Patient-selected goal attainment for pessary wearers: what is the clinical relevance? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):577. e1-5.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mamik MM, et al. Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013. The objective of this study was to compare the differences in goal attainment of self-described goals in patients who elected surgery vs. pessary for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Patients who chose surgery had better global improvement and met their goals better compared to patients who chose pessary.

  31. Hullfish KL et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of women with pelvic floor dysfunction: patient centered goals at 1 year. J Urol. 2008;179(6):2280–5. discussion 2285.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. A longitudinal study of patient and surgeon goal achievement 2 years after surgery following pelvic floor dysfunction surgery. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117(12):1504–11. This study highlights the differences in goal achievement and overall satisfaction in surgeons and patients undergoing or performing prolapse and incontinence surgery.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Adams SR et al. Do patient goals vary with stage of prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(5):502. e1-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shveiky D et al. Patient goal attainment in vaginal prolapse repair with and without mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(11):1541–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Paraiso MF et al. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1762–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mahajan ST et al. Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(3):722–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. de Boer TA et al. Predictive factors for overactive bladder symptoms after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(9):1143–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pham T et al. New pelvic symptoms are common after reconstructive pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(1):88. e1-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Margarita M. Aponte and Dr. Nirit Rosenblum each declare no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 150 E 32nd Street 2nd floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA

    Margarita M. Aponte & Nirit Rosenblum

  2. Department of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Margarita M. Aponte

Authors
  1. Margarita M. Aponte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nirit Rosenblum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarita M. Aponte.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Female Urology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aponte, M.M., Rosenblum, N. Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: What is the Goal?. Curr Urol Rep 15, 385 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-013-0385-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-013-0385-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation