Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal management of the 3-to 6-centimeter anterior urethral stricture

  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optimal management of anterior urethral stricture that does not respond to an endoscopic urethrotomy or is found to be unsuitable for excision and anastomotic repair remains controversial. Genital skin island onlay flaps or buccal mucosal grafts are presently the most dependable single stage procedures used for strictures more than 3 cm in length. Nonhirsute penile island fasciocutaneous flaps constitute the most durable substitution technique for pendulous stricture disease, with long-term studies reporting 90% to 96% success. The complex proximal bulb and bulbomenbraneous stricture with a compromised proximal fibrous avascular bed is ideally managed with either a penile or scrotal island flap or some combination of partial urethral excision with a dorsally placed genital skin island. The buccal mucosal onlay graft is a promising addition to this reconstructive paradigm, and early outcomes have been favorable. The graft is presently used for bulbar strictures, avoiding the transsphincteric on pendulous location, or a compromised recipient bed.

The present standard of care for proximal bulb strictures is wide bulbospongiosal mobilization, partial urethral excision, a floor strip anastomosis, and placement of an augmenting flap on the graft in a dorsal location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Zinman L: Surgical management of anterior urethral strictures. In Reconstruction and Plastic Surgery of the External Genitalia. Edited by Ehrlich R, Alter G. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1999:369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Venn SN, Mundy AR: Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol 1998, 81:735–737. The authors concluded that a two-stage free-graft urethroplast using nongenital skin is recommended for anterior urethral strictures caused by BXO.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbaglia G, Selli C, di Cell V, Mottola A: A one-stage dorsal free graft urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture. Br J Urol 1996, 78:929–932.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wessells H: RE: dorsal free graft urethroplasty. J Urol 1996, 156:144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anema JG, Morey AF, McAninch JW, et al.: Complications related to high lithotomy position during urethral reconstruction. J Urol 2000, 164:360–363. A thorough study identifying risk factors.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mundy AR: Long-term results of skin inlay urethroplasty. Br J Urol 1995, 75:59–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenwell TJ, Venn SN, Mundy AR: Changing practice in anterior urethroplasty. BJU Intl 1999, 83:631–635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakai S, Yoshinaga R: The prepure flap in the reconstruction of male anal stenosis. Br J Plast Surg 1999, 52:660–662.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Orandi A: One-stage urethroplasty—4 year follow-up. J Urol 1972, 107:977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Quartey JK: One-stage penile/preputial cutaneous island flap urethroplasty for urethral stricture. A preliminary report. J Urol 1983, 129:284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schreiter F, Noll F: Mesh graft and urethroplasty using split thickness skin graft. J Urol 1989, 143:1223.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jordan GH, Schlossberg SM, Devine CS: Surgery of the penis and urethra. In Campbell’s Urology, edn 7. Edited by Walsh PC, Retik AB, et al. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1997:3316–3394.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tran L, Zinman L, Morey AF: “Q-flap” deconstruction of panurethral strictures. J Urol 1999, 161(suppl):101. This article provides valuable information regarding Q-flap reconstruction.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zinman LN, Vereb MJ, Gaertner R, et al.: Bipedicle ventral penile island flap urethroplasty [abstract]. J Urol 1996, 155(suppl):501A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Devine PC, Sakati LA, Poutasse EF, Devine CT: One-stage urethroplasty: repair of strictures with free full thickness patch of skin. J Urol 1968, 99:191.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD: Analysis of factors contributing to success or failure of one-stage urethroplasty for stricture disease. J Urol 1994, 151:869.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Kasaby AW, Fath-Alla M, Noweir AM, et al.: The use of buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of anterior urethral strictures. J Urol 1993, 149:276.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson AM, Scholma J, Blaauw EH, et al.: Improved in vitro generation of epithelial grafts with oral mucosa. Transplantation 1994, 58:1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fichtner J, Fisch M, De Elia G, et al.: Buccal mucosa onlay graft for urethral reconstruction: the first 100 consecutive cases. J Urol 1997, 157(suppl):247.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morey AF, McAninch JW: When and how to use buccal mucosal grafts in adult bulbar urethroplasty. Urology 1996, 48:194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zinman, L. Optimal management of the 3-to 6-centimeter anterior urethral stricture. Curr Urol Rep 1, 180–189 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-000-0017-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-000-0017-1

Keywords

Navigation