Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New ACR EULAR Guidelines for Systemic Sclerosis Classification

  • Scleroderma (J Varga, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Rheumatology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for systemic sclerosis are a significant advancement in the field. This article describes the innovative, rigorous, criteria development strategy that was used. The new criteria build upon previous criteria by incorporating important elements (proximal scleroderma, sclerodactyly, digital pits, pulmonary fibrosis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, and scleroderma specific autoantibodies). The new criteria add emphasis to the vasculopathic manifestations, and include the early manifestation of puffy fingers. Together, these enhancements have resulted in a shift in the conceptual framework of the disease for the next generation. The new criteria have improved sensitivity and specifically, particularly among cases with early disease, mild disease, or limited disease. The ability to classify more cases, at an earlier stage, may confer the opportunity to intervene and prevent disease progression. Undoubtedly, this will lead to a paradigm shift in the conduct of clinical trials in systemic sclerosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Matucci-Cerinic M, Kahaleh B, Wigley FM. Review: evidence that systemic sclerosis is a vascular disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(8):1953–62. This paper highlights the importance of vascular manifestations of systemic sclerosis.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23(5):581–90.

  3. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). BullRheumDis. 1981;31(1):1–6.

  4. Nadashkevich O, Davis P, Fritzler MJ. A proposal of criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10(11):CR615–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nadashkevich O, Davis P, Fritzler MJ. Revising the classification criteria for systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(6):992–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. LeRoy EC, Medsger Jr TA. Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(7):1573–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Avouac J, Fransen J, Walker UA, Riccieri V, Smith V, Muller C, et al. Preliminary criteria for the very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis: results of a Delphi Consensus Study from EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(3):476–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson SR, Goek ON, Singh-Grewal D, Vlad SC, Feldman BM, Felson DT, et al. Classification criteria in rheumatic diseases: a review of methodologic properties. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(7):1119–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pope JE. Systemic sclerosis classification: a rose by any other name would smell as sweet? J Rheumatol. 2015;42(1):11–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lonzetti LS, Joyal F, Raynauld JP, Roussin A, Goulet JR, Rich E, et al. Updating the American College of Rheumatology preliminary classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: addition of severe nailfold capillaroscopy abnormalities markedly increases the sensitivity for limited scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(3):735–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wigley FM. When is scleroderma really scleroderma? J Rheumatol. 2001;28(7):1471–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wollheim FA. Classification of systemic sclerosis. Visions and reality. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(10):1212–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, Jablonska S, Krieg T, Medsger Jr TA, et al. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(2):202–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson SR, Feldman BM, Hawker GA. Classification criteria for systemic sclerosis subsets. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(9):1855–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Masi AT, Medsger Jr TA. Progress in the evolution of systemic sclerosis classification criteria and recommendation for additional comparative specificity studies. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(1):8–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barnett AJ, Coventry DA. Scleroderma. 1. Clinical features, course of illness and response to treatment in 61 cases. Med J Aust. 1969;1(19):992–1001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferri C, Valentini G, Cozzi F, Sebastiani M, Michelassi C, La Montagna G, et al. Systemic sclerosis: demographic, clinical, and serologic features and survival in 1,012 Italian patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2002;81(2):139–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giordano M, Valentini G, Migliaresi S, Picillo U, Vatti M. Different antibody patterns and different prognoses in patients with scleroderma with various extent of skin sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 1986;13(5):911–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goetz R, Berne M. The pathophysiology of progressive systemic sclerosis (generalised scleroderma) with special reference to changes in the viscere. Clin Proc. 1945;4:337–92.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holzmann H, Sollberg S, Altmeyer P. Classification of progressive systemic scleroderma. Hautarzt. 1987;38(5):253–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maricq HR, Valter I. A working classification of scleroderma spectrum disorders: a proposal and the results of testing on a sample of patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22(3 Suppl 33):S5–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Masi AT. Classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): relationship of cutaneous subgroups in early disease to outcome and serologic reactivity. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(6):894–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodnan GP, Jablonska S, Medsger TA. Classification and nomenclature of progressive systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheum Dis. 1979;5(1):5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scussel-Lonzetti L, Joyal F, Raynauld JP, Roussin A, Rich E, Goulet JR, et al. Predicting mortality in systemic sclerosis: analysis of a cohort of 309 French Canadian patients with emphasis on features at diagnosis as predictive factors for survival. Medicine (Baltimore). 2002;81(2):154–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tuffanelli DL, Winkelmann RK. Diffuse systemic scleroderma. A comparison with acrosclerosis. Ann Intern Med. 1962;57:198–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Winterbauer RH. Multiple telengiectasia, Raynaud’s phenomenon, sclerodactyly, and subcutaneous calcinosis: a syndrome mimicking hereditary hemorrhagic telengiectasia. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1964;114:361–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Valentini G, Cuomo G, Abignano G, Petrillo A, Vettori S, Capasso A, et al. Early systemic sclerosis: assessment of clinical and pre-clinical organ involvement in patients with different disease features. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(2):317–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Felson DT, Anderson JJ. Methodological and statistical approaches to criteria development in rheumatic diseases. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995;9(2):253–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh JA, Solomon DH, Dougados M, Felson D, Hawker G, Katz P, et al. Development of classification and response criteria for rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(3):348–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dougados M, Betteridge N, Burmester GR, Euller-Ziegler L, Guillemin F, Hirvonen J, et al. EULAR standardised operating procedures for the elaboration, evaluation, dissemination, and implementation of recommendations endorsed by the EULAR standing committees. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(9):1172–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dougados M, Gossec L. Classification criteria for rheumatic diseases: why and how? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(7):1112–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(11):2737–47. This paper outlines the new American College of Rheumatology European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for systemic sclerosis.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(11):1747–55. This paper outlines the new American College of Rheumatology European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for systemic sclerosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fransen J, Johnson SR, van den Hoogen F, Baron M, Allanore Y, Carreira PE, et al. Items for developing revised classification criteria in systemic sclerosis: results of a consensus exercise. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(3):351–7. This paper describes the use of Delphi methods and nominal group technique for classification criteria development.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Coulter C, Baron M, Pope JE. A Delphi exercise and cluster analysis to aid in the development of potential classification criteria for systemic sclerosis using SSc experts and databases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(2 Suppl 76):24–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson SR, Fransen J, Khanna D, Baron M, van den Hoogen F, Medsger Jr TA, et al. Validation of potential classification criteria for systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(3):358–67. This paper describes validation of candidate criteria in cases and controls from multiple international cohorts.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnson SR, Naden RP, Fransen J, van den Hoogen F, Pope JE, Baron M, et al. Multicriteria decision analysis methods with 1000Minds for developing systemic sclerosis classification criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):706–14. This paper describes the use of multicriteria decision analysis (conjoint analysis) for classification criteria development.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Alhajeri H, Hudson M, Fritzler M, Pope J, Tatibouet S, Markland J, et al. The 2013 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis Out-Perform the 1980 Criteria. Data from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015. In press.

  39. Hoffmann-Vold AM, Gunnarsson R, Garen T, Midtvedt O, Molberg O. Performance of the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) in large, well-defined cohorts of SSc and mixed connective tissue disease. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(1):60–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Aggarwal R, Ringold S, Khanna D, Neogi T, Johnson SR, Miller A, et al. Are diagnostic criteria different than classification criteria? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015; in press.

  41. Johnson SR, Tomlinson GA, Hawker GA, Granton JT, Feldman BM. Methods to elicit beliefs for Bayesian priors: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(4):355–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Scalapino K, Arkachaisri T, Lucas M, Fertig N, Helfrich DJ, Londino Jr AV, et al. Childhood onset systemic sclerosis: classification, clinical and serologic features, and survival in comparison with adult onset disease. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(5):1004–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Johnson SR, Laxer RM. Classification in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(5):840–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham 3rd CO, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1580–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Minier T, Guiducci S, Bellando-Randone S, Bruni C, Lepri G, Czirjak L, et al. Preliminary analysis of the Very Early Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis (VEDOSS) EUSTAR multicentre study: evidence for puffy fingers as a pivotal sign for suspicion of systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(12):2087–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sindhu Johnson has been awarded a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Clinician Scientist Award and is supported by the Freda Fejer Fund and the Norton-Evans Fund for Scleroderma Research.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Sindhu Johnson declares grants from American College of Rheumatology and from the European League Against Rheumatism, during the writing of this paper. She declares that she is Co-chair of the American College of Rheumatology Classification and Response Criteria subcommittee.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sindhu R. Johnson.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Scleroderma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, S.R. New ACR EULAR Guidelines for Systemic Sclerosis Classification. Curr Rheumatol Rep 17, 32 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-015-0506-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-015-0506-3

Keywords

Navigation