Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Advances in Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment

  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alcohol and other drug use among adolescents has been a public health problem for decades. Although some substance use may be developmentally routine, a concerning number of adolescents meet criteria for a substance use disorder and could greatly benefit from a quality treatment experience. However, parents and health care providers want evidence of the efficacy of adolescent-specific treatment programs. This review summarizes four factors surrounding the efficacy of current adolescent treatment programs: 1) adolescent-specific treatment services; 2) the variety of therapeutic modalities; 3) relapse and recovery rates; and 4) the need for evidence-based, quality assessments and research. Current adolescent treatment efforts are summarized, and the recent literature regarding the efficacy of adolescent treatment and recovery rates is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. •• Chung T, Martin CS. Prevalence and clinical course of adolescent substance use and substance use disorders. In: Kaminer Y, Winters KC, editors. Clinical Manual of Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatments. Washington, D. C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2011. p. 1–23. This book chapter provides a summary of the extent of drug involvement by youth in the United States and discusses the empiric knowledge regarding the course of SUDs as youth age from their early teenage years to young adulthood.

  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse. High school and youth trends. 2011; Available at http://drugabuse.gov/pdf/infofacts/HSYouthTrends.pdf.

  3. Rockholz PB. Management of youth with substance use disorders in the juvenile justice system. In: Kaminer Y, Winters KC, editors. Clinical manual of adolescent substance abuse treatments. Arlington: American Psychiatric; 2011. p. 415–49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration S. Results from the 2003 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Rockville, MD; 2004.

  5. Hoffman NG, Abrantes AM, Anton R. Problems identified by the Practical Adolescent Dual Diagnosis Interview (PADDI) in a juvenile detention center population. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute; 2004; Available at http://www.civivresearchinstitute.com/achsa/toc_pdfs/TOA_Frontmatter.prf.

  6. Chen CY, O'Brien MS, Anthony JC. Who becomes cannabis dependent soon after onset of use? Epidemiological evidence from the United States: 2000–2001. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79(1):11–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Studies) OOoA. Substance use treatment need among adolescents: 2003–2004. The NSDUH Report. 2006;24.

  8. Knudsen HK. Adolescent-only substance abuse treatment: availability and adoption of components of quality. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;36(2):195–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Winters KC. Adolescent brain development and drug use. 2004; Available at http://www.tresearch.org/adolescents/NewTeenBrainWriteup.pdf.

  10. White W, Miller W. The use of confrontation in addiction: history, science and time for change. Counselor. 2007;8(4):12–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. White W, Dennis M, Tims FM. Adolescent treatment: its history and current renaissance. Counselor Magazine. 2002;3(2):20–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown SA, Anderson KG, Ramo DE, Tomlinson KL. Treatment of adolescent alcohol-related problems. A translational perspective. Recent Dev Alcohol. 2005;17:327–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner M, Steinberg L. Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Dev Psychol. 2005;41(4):625–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Winters KC. Treating adolescents with substance use disorders: an overview of practice issues and treatment outcome. Subst Abus. 1999;20:203–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. ASAM. ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders (Second Edition—Revised): (ASAM PPC-2R). 2001; Available at http://www.asam.org/PatientPlacementCriteria.html.

  16. Szapocznik J, Coatsworth D. An ecodevelopmental framework for organizing the influences of drug abuse: a developmental model of risk and protection. In: Glantz MD, editor. Drug abuse: origins and interventions. Washington: American Psychological Association; 1999. p. 331–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiss RD, Jaffee WB, de Menil VP, Cogley CB. Group therapy for substance use disorders: what do we know? Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2004;12(6):339–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beck A, Weishaar M. Cognitive therapy. In: Corsini RJ, Wedding D, editors. Current psychotherapies. 7th ed. Belmont: Thomas Brooks/Cole; 2005. p. 238–68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Waldron HB, Slesnick N, Brody JL, Turner CW, Peterson TR. Treatment outcomes for adolescent substance abuse at 4- and 7-month assessments. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(5):802–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rollnick S, Miller WR. What is motivational interviewing? Behav Cog Psychother. 1995;23:325–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaminer Y, Spirito A, Lewander W. Brief motivational interventions, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and contingency management for youth substance use disorders. In: Kaminer Y, Winters K, editors. Clinical manual of adolescent substance abuse treatment. Arlington: American Psychiatric; 2011. p. 213–38.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Borkman T. The twelve-step recovery model of AA: a voluntary mutual help association. Recent Dev Alcohol. 2008;18:9–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anonymous A. Alcoholics Anonymous 2007 Membership Survey 2008: Available at http://www.aa.org/pdf/products/p-48_07survey.pdf.

  24. Morral AR, McCafferey DF, Ridgeway G. Effectiveness of community-based treatment for substance-abusing adolescents: 12-month outcomes of youth entering Phoenix Academy or alternative probation dispositions. Psychol Addict Behav. 2004;18:257–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jainchill N. Therapeutic communities for adolescents: the same and not the same. In: DeLeon G, editor. Community as method: therapeutic communities for special populations and special settings. Westport: Praeger; 1997. p. 161–78.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Deas D, Thomas SE. An overview of controlled studies of adolescent substance abuse treatment. Am J Addict. 2001;10(2):178–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. •• Lipsey MW, Tanner-Smith EE, Wilson SJ. Comparative Effectiveness of Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment: Three Meta-analyses With Implications for Practice. Nashville, TN: Peabody Research Institute, Vanderbilt University; 2010. This publication provides a current and comprehensive review of published adolescent drug abuse treatment outcome studies.

  28. Winters KC, editor. Guidelines for treating adolescents with a substance use disorder. Rockville: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Treating teens: a guide to adolescent drug programs. Washington, D. C.: Drug Strategies; 2003.

  30. Brannigan R, Schackman BR, Falco M, Millman RB. The quality of highly regarded adolescent substance abuse treatment programs: results of an in-depth national survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(9):904–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mark TL, Song X, Vandivort R, Duffy S, Butler J, Coffey R, et al. Characterizing substance abuse programs that treat adolescents. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;31(1):59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Winters KC, Botzet AM, Fahnhorst T, Koskey R. Adolescent substance abuse treatment: a review of evidence-based research. In: Leukefeld C, Gullotta T, Tindall MS, editors. Handbook on the prevention and treatment of substance abuse in adolescence. New York: Springer Academic; 2009. p. 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grella CE, Joshi V, Hser YI. Effects of comorbidity on treatment processes and outcomes among adolescents in drug treatment programs. J CASA. 2004;13:13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Whitney SD, Kelly JF, Myers MG, Brown SA. Parental substance use, family support and outcome following treatment for adolescent psychoactive substance use disorders. JCASA. 2002;11:67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Williams R, Chang S. A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2000;7:138–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Anderson KG, Ramo DE, Schulte MT, Cummins K, Brown SA. Substance use treatment outcomes for youth: integrating personal and environmental predictors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88(1):42–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper was supported in part by grant nos. K02 DA15347 and P50-DA02784 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken C. Winters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winters, K.C., Botzet, A.M. & Fahnhorst, T. Advances in Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment. Curr Psychiatry Rep 13, 416–421 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-011-0214-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-011-0214-2

Keywords

Navigation