Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Meta-Analysis of thirty-four independent samples studied using PET reveals a significantly attenuated central response to noxious stimulation in clinical pain patients

  • Published:
Current Review of Pain Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic pain disorder is widely understood as a “biopsychosocial” phenomenon, meaning that it is influenced by psychology and certain life events. This broad understanding of chronic pain suggests that central responses during pain experience should be altered in patients compared with pain-free volunteers. A total of 34 studies are reviewed, revealing a widespread “neuromatrix” of activated regions. These regions include the brain stem, thalamus, and lentiform nucleus, and the insula, prefrontal, parietal, and anterior cingulate cortices. Meta-analysis of these studies does not reveal any single region or pattern of activity to be of particular influence during chronic pain but does reveal a generally reduced response to noxious stimulation in patients with concomitant clinical pain. The relevance of this finding remains unclear with the most parsimonious explanation being increased response variability in patients. More specific findings can be revealed when using a hypothesis-generated approach; further investigation of genetic and developmental predisposition is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Grennan DM,Jayson MIV: Rheumatoid arthritis. In In The Textbook of Pain. Edited by Wall PD, Melzack R. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1989:317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robertson JT: The rape of the spine. Surg Neurol 1993, 39:5–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Waddell G: Low back pain: a twentieth century health care enigma. Spine 1996, 21:2820–2825. Very useful discussion of the dramatic increase in reported back pain in the United Kingdom.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jensen MC,Brant-Zawadzki MN,Obuchowski N, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994, 331:69–73. Important study demonstrating no discernible clinical difference (using magnetic resonance images of the lower back) in patients with nonspecific lower back pain, compared with age- and sex-matched pain-free control subjects.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Derbyshire SWG, Jones AKP, Creed F, et al.: Cerebral responses to noxious thermal stimulation are the same in chronic low back pain patients as normal controls. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999, in press.

  6. Fordyce WE: Back Pain in the Workplace: Management of Disability in Non-Specific Conditions. Seattle: IASP Press; 1995. Controversial report from the IASP suggesting that patients with nonspecific low back pain be categorized as “activity intolerant” rather than disabled.

  7. Loeser J: Editorial comment: back pain in the workplace: II. Pain 1996, 65:7–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nachemson AL: Newest knowledge of low back pain: a critical look. Clin Orthop 1992, 279:8–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flor H,Fydrich T,Turk DC: Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review. Pain 1992, 49:221–230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fordyce WE: Response to Thompson/Merskey/Teasell. Pain 1996, 65:112–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris M,Feinmann C: Psychosomatic disorders. In Oral Manifestations of Systemic Disease. Edited by Mason MK, Jones JG. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.; 1990:30–60.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Derbyshire SWG: Sources of variation in assessing male and female responses to pain. New Ideas Psychol 1997, 15:83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Drossman DA,Creed FH,Fava GA: Psychosocial aspects of the functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterol Int 1995, 8:47–90.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Veale D,Kavanagh G,Fielding JF,Fitzgerald O: Primary fibromyalgia and the irritable bowel syndrome: different expressions of a common pathogenetic process. Br J Rheumatol 1991, 30:220–222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Melzack R,Casey KL: Sensory, motivational and central control determinants of pain. In The Skin Senses. Edited by Kenshalo D. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1968:423–443.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waddell G: A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 1987, 12:632–644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Merskey H: The definition of pain. Eur J Psychiatry 1991, 6:153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flor H,Fydrich T,Turk DC: Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review. Pain 1992, 49:221–230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fishbain DA,Cutler RB,Rosomoff HL,Rosomoff RS: Do antidepressants have an analgesic effect in psychogenic pain and somatoform pain disorder? A meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 1998, 60:503–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Talbot JD,Marret S,Evans AC, et al.: Multiple representations of pain in human cerebral cortex. Science 1991, 251:1355–1358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones APK,Brown WD,Friston KJ, et al.: Cortical and subcortical localization of response to pain in man using positron emission tomography. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1991, 244:39–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Knezevich S: Handbook of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Woods JH: Cerebral Blood Flow: Physiologic and Clinical Aspects. New York: McGraw Hill; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Resicgno A,Boicelli A: Cerebral Blood Flow: Mathematic Models, Instrumentation and Imaging Techniques. New York: Plenum; 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Brooks RA,DiChiro B: Principles of computer assisted tomography (CAT) in radiographic and radioisotopic imaging. Phys Med Biol 1976, 24:689–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Watson JDG,Myers R,Frackowiak RSJ, et al.: Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 1993, 3:79–94. Not a study of pain, but a truly excellent demonstration of how to use PET and present the results.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Adam LE,Zaers J,Ostertag H, et al.: Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR+ following the IEC standards. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1997, 44:1172–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Duncan GH,Bushnell MC,Talbot JD, et al.: Pain and activation in the thalamus [letter]. Trends Neurosci 1992, 15:252–253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wall PD: Pain in the brain and lower parts of the anatomy [letter]. Pain 1995, 62:389–391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Craig AD,Zhang ET,Bushnell MC,Blomqvist A: Reply to P.D. Wall [letter]. Pain 1995, 62:391–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Craig AD,Zhang ET,Bushnell MC,Blomqvist A: A thalamic nucleus specific for pain and temperature sensation. Nature 1994, 372:770–773. Worth reading in conjunction with Wall’s critique [29] and Craig et al.’s response [30] to provide an insight into the difference in philosophy as well as interpretation of the science.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Casey, KL: Pain and Central Nervous System Disease. New York: Raven Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Craig AD,Reiman EM,Evans A,Bushnell MC: Functional imaging of an illusion of pain. Nature 1996, 384:258–260. One of the few truly hypothesis-driven functional imaging studies following Craig et al.’s other work [31].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adler LJ,Gyulai FE,Diehl DJ, et al.: Regional brain activity associated with fentanyl analgesia elucidated by positron emission tomography. Anesth Analg 1997, 84:120–126.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Andersson JLR,Lilja A,Hartvig P, et al.: Somatotopic organization along the central sulcus, for pain localization in humans, as revealed by positron emission tomography. Exp Brain Res 1997, 117:192–199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Aziz Q,Andersson JLR,Valind S, et al.: Identification of human brain loci processing esophageal sensation using positron emission tomography. Gastroenterology 1997, 113:50–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Casey KL,Minoshima S,Berger KL, et al.: Positron emission tomographic analysis of cerebral structures activated specifically by repetitive noxious heat stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1994, 71:802–807.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Casey KL,Minoshima S,Morrow TJ,Koeppe RA: Comparison of human cerebral activation patterns during cutaneous warmth, heat pain, and deep cold pain. J Neurophysiol 1996, 76:571–581.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Coghill RC,Talbot JD,Evans AC, et al.: Distributed processing of pain and vibration by the human brain. J Neurosci 1994, 14:4095–4108.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Derbyshire SWG, Jones AKP, Collins M, et al.: Cerebral responses to pain in patients suffering acute post dental extraction pain measured by positron emission tomography (PET). Eur J Pain 1999, in press.

  41. Derbyshire SWG,Jones AKP: Cerebral responses to a continual tonic pain stimulus measured using positron emission tomography. Pain 1998, 76:127–135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Derbyshire SWG,Jones AKP,Gyulai F, et al.: Pain processing during three levels of noxious stimulation produces differential patterns of central activity. Pain 1997, 73:431–445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Derbyshire SWG,Jones AKP,Devani P, et al.: Cerebral responses to pain in patients with atypical facial pain measured by positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994, 57:1166–1173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Di Piero V,Jones AKP,Iannotti F, et al.: Chronic pain: a PET study of the central effects of percutaneous high cervical cordotomy. Pain 1991, 46:9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hsieh JC,Stahle-Backdahl M,Hagermark O, et al.: Traumatic nociceptive pain activates the hypothalamus and the periaqueductal gray: a positron emission tomography study. Pain 1995, 64:303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hsieh JC,Belfrage M,Stone-Elander S, et al.: Central representation of chronic ongoing neuropathic pain studied by positron emission tomography. Pain 1995, 63:225–236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hsieh JC,Hannerz J,Ingvar M: Right-lateralised central processing for pain of nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache. Pain 1996, 67:59–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Iadarola MJ,Berman KF,Zeffiro TA, et al.: Neural activation during acute capsaicin-evoked pain and allodynia assessed with PET. Brain 1998, 121:931–947. Interesting study with a useful review of other functional imaging data.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jones AKP,Derbyshire SWG: Reduced cortical responses to noxious heat in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Ann Rheum Dis 1997, 56:601–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. May A,Kaube H,Buchel C, et al.: Experimental cranial pain elicited by capsaicin: a PET study. Pain 1998; 74:61–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. May A,Bahra A,Buchel C, et al.: Hypothalamic activation in cluster headache attacks. Lancet 1998, 352:275–278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Paulson PM,Minoshima S,Morrow TJ,Casey KL: Gender differences in pain perception and patterns of cerebral activation during noxious heat stimulation in humans. Pain 1998, 76:223–229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Peyron R,Garcia-Larrea L,Gregoire MC, et al.: Allodynia after lateral-medullary (Wallenberg) infarct: a PET study. Brain 1998, 121:345–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rainville P,Duncan GH,Price DD, et al.: Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 1997, 277:968–971. A truly hypothesis-driven study.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rosen SD,Paulesu E,Frith CD, et al.: Central nervous pathways mediating angina pectoris. Lancet 1994, 344:147–150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Silverman DHS,Munakata JA,Ennes H, et al.: Regional cerebral activity in normal and pathological perception of visceral pain. Gastroenterology 1997, 112:64–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Svennson P,Johannsen P,Jensen TS, et al.: Cerebral blood-flow changes evoked by two levels of painful heat stimulation: a positron emission tomography study in humans. Eur J Pain 1998, 2:95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Svennson P,Minsohima S,Beydoun A, et al.: Cerebral processing of acute skin and muscle pain in humans. J Neurophysiol 1997, 78:450–460.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Vogt BA,Derbyshire SWG,Jones AKP: Pain processing in four regions of human cingulate cortex localized with coregistered PET and MR imaging. Eur J Neurosci 1996, 8:1461–1473. The first presentation and discussion of individual variability in functional imaging studies of pain.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Weiller C,May A,Limmroth V, et al.: Brain stem activation in spontaneous human migraine attacks. Nat Med 1995, 7:658–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Xu X,Fukuyama H,Yazawa S, et al.: Functional localization of pain perception in the human brain studied by PET. Neuroreport 1997, 8:555–559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Melzack R: Phantom limbs, the self and the brain: the D.O. Hebb memorial lecture. Can Psychol 1989, 30:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Treede RD,Kenshalo DR,Gracely RH,Jones AKP: The cortical representation of pain. Pain 1999, 79:105–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Casey KL,Minoshima S: Can pain be imaged? In In Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Pain, Progress in Pain Research and Management, vol 8. Edited by Jensen TS, Turner JA, Weisenfeld-Hallin Z. Seattle: IASP Press; 1997:855–866.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gold S,Arndt S,Johnson D, et al.: Factors that influence effect size in 15O PET studies: a meta-analytic review. Neuroimage 1997, 5:280–291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sakiyama Y,Sato A,Senda M, et al.: Positron emission tomography reveals changes in global and regional cerebral blood flow during noxious stimulation of normal and inflamed elbow joints in anesthetized cats. Exp Brain Res 1998, 118:439–446. Undercited report that describes a huge central response to noxious stimulation in cats.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Jones AKP,Derbyshire SWG: Cerebral mechanisms operating in the presence and absence of inflammatory pain. Ann Rheum Dis 1996, 55:411–420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Davis KD,Kwan CL,Crawley AP,Mikulis DJ: Functional MRI study of thalamic and cortical activations evoked by cutaneous heat, cold and tactile stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1998, 80:1533–1546.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Chapman CR, Nakamura Y: Pain and consciousness: a constructivist approach. Pain Forum 1999, in press. Very interesting discussion of the problems associated with interpreting functional imaging data.

  70. Chalmers DJ: Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Consciousness Stud 1995, 2:200–2195. Extremely thoughtful analysis of the problem of consciousness an how it might be related to studies of cognition and physiology.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Andreasen NC: Linking mind and brain in the study of mental illnesses: a project for a scientific psychopathology. Science 1997, 275:1586–1593. A very different approach to that of Chalmers [70], suggesting a pragmatic end-run around the “hard problem.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Derbyshire SWG,Furedi A,Glover V, et al.: Can a foetus feel pain? Br Med J 1996, 313:795–798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Cunningham N: Primary requirements for an ethical definition of pain. Pain Forum 1999, in press.

  74. Derbyshire SWG: The IASP definition captures the essence of pain experience. Pain Forum 1999, 8:106–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Bushnell MC, Duncan GH, Hofbauer RK: Human functional brain imaging: the bridge from neurophysiology to the mind. Pain Forum 1999, in press.

  76. Freedman R,Adler LE,Leonard S: Alternative phenotypes for the complex genetics of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 1999, 45:551–558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Mogil JS,Grisel JE: Transgenic studies of pain. Pain 1998, 77:107–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCLA/CURE Neuroenteric Disease Program, WLA VAMC, Building 115, Room 223, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, 90073, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Stuart W. G. Derbyshire MD

Authors
  1. Stuart W. G. Derbyshire MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Derbyshire, S.W.G. Meta-Analysis of thirty-four independent samples studied using PET reveals a significantly attenuated central response to noxious stimulation in clinical pain patients. Current Review of Pain 3, 265–280 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-999-0044-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-999-0044-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation