Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Post-acute Care Needs and Benefits of Inpatient Rehabilitation Care for the Oncology Patient

  • CANCER REHABILITATION (M CLARK, SECTION EDITOR)
  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This study aims to assess recent literature published on the post-acute care needs of cancer patients, specifically focusing on the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting.

Recent Findings

The neurologic cancer population appears to be the most studied oncologic population in acute inpatient rehabilitation studies within the past 5 years. This finding is consistent with prior findings from the past several decades. Recent trends in inpatient cancer rehabilitation note a population with lower admission functional status and shorter lengths of stay compared to prior studies. Despite these findings, the percentage discharged to the community remains high.

Summary

With new treatments yielding improved survival, cancer patients may live longer and risk accumulating more functional impairments. Physicians involved in their care must understand post-acute care needs and work in a multidisciplinary group to best determine post-acute disposition. This decision remains very individualized and should consider both oncologic and functional needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this article are available within the article.

References 

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weir HK, Thompson TD, Stewart SL, White MC. Cancer Incidence Projections in the United States Between 2015 and 2050. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:210006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold MA, Rutherford MJ, Bardot A et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1493–1505.

  4. Sliwa JA, Shahpar S, Huang ME, et al. Cancer Rehabilitation: Do Functional Gains Relate to 60 Percent Rule Classification or to the Presence of Metastasis? PM R. 2016;8(2):131–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tennison JM, Sullivan CM, Fricke BC, Bruera E. Analysis of adherence to acute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with cancer. J Cancer. 2021;12(20):5987–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fu JB, Raj VS, Guo Y. A guide to inpatient cancer rehabilitation: Focusing on patient selection and evidence-based outcomes. PM&R. 2017;9:S324–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng AH, Gupta E, Fontillas RC, et al. Patient-reported usefulness of acute cancer rehabilitation. PM&R. 2017;9:1135–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. • Bilek AJ, Borodin O, Carmi L, et al. Older patients with active cancer have favorable inpatient rehabilitation outcomes. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021;12:799–807. This study evaluated older patients with active cancer in acute inpatient rehabilitation and found that 80% of the patients were able to be discharged to the community.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ture M, Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Renner C, et al. Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study. J Cancer. 2017;8(10):1717–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Gallegos-Kearin V, Knowlton S, Goldstein R, et al. Outcome trends of adult cancer patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation: a 13-year review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97(7):514–22. This study evaluated trends in inpatient rehabilitation of cancer patients and noted a decrease in admission FIM score over the 13-year period, with similar functional gains made.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts PS, Nuño M, Sherman D, et al. The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on function and survival of newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma. PM&R. 2014;6:514–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reilly JM, Gundersen AI, Silver JK, et al. A Comparison of Functional Outcomes between Patients Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation after Initial Diagnosis versus Recurrence of Glioblastoma Multiforme. PM&R. 2020;12:975–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chowdhury N, Scott C, O’Dell MW. Recovery in glioblastoma multiforme during inpatient rehabilitation is equivalent in first versus repeat resection: A 10-year retrospective analysis. PM&R J. 2022;14:40–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimoda K, Imai H, Tsuji T, et al. Factors affecting the performance of activities of daily living in patients with advanced cancer undergoing inpatient rehabilitation: results from a retrospective observational study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(10):795–801.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. •• Tennison JM, Fricke BC, Fu JB, et al. Medical complications and prognostic factors for medically unstable conditions during acute inpatient cancer rehabilitation. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17:e1502-1511. This study examined rate of medical complications in cancer patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and found 96% of consecutive oncologic patients admitted to acute rehabilitation during a 6-month time period had at least one medical complication, and 19% necessitated transfer back to the acute care service.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. •• Tennison JM, Rianon NJ, Manzano JG, et al. Thirty-day hospital readmission rate, reasons, and risk factors after acute inpatient cancer rehabilitation. Cancer Med. 2021;10:6199–206. This study noted in their population of inpatient cancer rehabilitation patients, the 30-day readmission rate after inpatient rehabilitation was 21%.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. •• Mix JM, Granger CV, LaMonte MJ, et al. Characterization of Cancer Patients in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(5):971–80. In this three-year retrospective study, the authors found that patients with oncologic diagnoses comprised only 2.4% of total IRF patients in US IRFs.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. •• Warren KT, Liu L, Liu Y, et al. Time to treatment initiation and outcomes in high-grade glioma patients in rehabilitation: a retrospective cohort study. CNS Oncol. 2020. This study found that that brain tumor patients discharged to IRF had a median length of stay of 10 days in acute care and a longer waiting time to initiate outpatient treatment.

  19. Smith SR, Zheng JY. The Intersection of Oncology Prognosis and Cancer Rehabilitation. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2017;5(1):46–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Spill GR, Hlubocky FJ, Daugherty CK. Oncologists’ and physiatrists’ attitudes regarding rehabilitation for patients with advanced cancer. PM&R. 2012;4(2):96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fukushima T, Tsuji T, Watanabe N, et al. The current status of inpatient cancer rehabilitation provided by designated cancer hospitals in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021;51(7):1094–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mukand JA, Blackinton DD, Crincoli MG, Lee JJ, Santos BB. Incidence of neurological deficits and rehabilitation of patients with brain tumours. Am J Rehab Med. 2001;80:346–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang ME, Cifu DX, Keyser-Marcus L. Functional outcome after brain tumor and acute stroke: A comparative analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1386–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang ME, Cifu DX, Keyser-Marcus L. Functional outcomes inpatients with brain tumor after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison with traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(4):327–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Dell MW, Barr K, Spanier D, Warnick RE. Functional outcome of inpatient rehabilitation in persons with brain tumors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1530–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang V, Rathbone M, Dorsay JP, et al. Rehabilitation in primary and metastatic brain tumours: impact of functional outcomes on survival. J Neurol. 2008;255:820–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ayotte SL, Harro CC. Effects of an individualized aerobic exercise program in individuals with a brain tumor undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Rehabil Oncol. 2017;35(4):163–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu J, Jung Y, Park J, et al. Intensive rehabilitation therapy following brain tumor surgery: a pilot study of effectiveness and long-term satisfaction. Ann Rehabil Med. 2019;43(2):129–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tay MRJ, Seah JD, Chua KSG. Long-term outcomes of patients with primary brain tumors after acute rehabilitation: A retrospective analyses of factors. Life. 2022;12:1208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ge L, Arul K, Mesfin A. Spinal Cord Injury From Spinal Tumors: Prevalence, Management, and Outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:e1551–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruppert LM, Reilly J. Metastatic spine oncology: symptom-directed management. Neurooncol Pract. 2020;7:i54-61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. New PW, Eriks-Hoogland I, Scivoletto G, et al. Important clinical rehabilitation principles unique to people with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017;23:299–312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. McKinley WO, Huang ME, Tewksbury MA. Neoplastic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury: an inpatient rehabilitation comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(2):138–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fortin CD, Voth J, Jaglal SB, et al. Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in patients with malignant spinal cord compression compared to other non-traumatic spinal cord injury: a population based study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(6):754–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ruff RL, Adamson VW, Ruff SS, Wang X. Directed rehabilitation reduces pain and depression while increasing independence and satisfaction with life for patients with paraplegia due to epidural metastatic spinal cord compression. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Afsar SI, Cosar SNS, Yemisci OU, Boluk H. Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in neoplastic spinal cord compression vs. traumatic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(2):221–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Knowlton SE, Zafonte R, O’Connor KC, et al. Characteristics and functional outcomes of chordoma patients admitted for inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(19):2275–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fu JB, Molinares DM, Morishita S, et al. Retrospective Analysis of Acute Rehabilitation Outcomes of Cancer Inpatients with Leptomeningeal Disease. PM&R. 2020;12(3):263–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Scherer-Trame S, Jansen L, Arndt V, et al. Inpatient rehabilitation therapy among colorectal cancer patients - utilization and association with prognosis: a cohort study. Acta Oncol. 2021;60(8):1000–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Worrell SL, Kirschner ML, Shatz RS, et al. Interdisciplinary approaches to survivorship with a focus on the low-grade and benign brain tumor populations. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021;23:19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu A, Ruiz Colon G, Lim M. Quality of life and role of palliative and supportive care for patients with brain metastases and caregivers: a review. Front Neurol. 2022;13:806344.

  42. Spratt DE, Beeler WH, de Moraes FY, et al. An integrated multidisciplinary algorithm for the management of spinal metastases: an International Spine Oncology Consortium report. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:e720–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center’s Center Support (Grant P30 CA008748/CA/NCI, National Institutes of Health/Health and Human Services, USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rehabilitation Medicine Service, Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 160 E 53rd St, New York, NY, USA

    Julia M. Reilly & Lisa Marie Ruppert

  2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Julia M. Reilly & Lisa Marie Ruppert

Authors
  1. Julia M. Reilly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa Marie Ruppert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia M. Reilly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cancer Rehabilitation.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reilly, J.M., Ruppert, L.M. Post-acute Care Needs and Benefits of Inpatient Rehabilitation Care for the Oncology Patient. Curr Oncol Rep 25, 155–162 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-023-01366-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-023-01366-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation